A12-9720P
VS
Xeon E5-2407

A12-9720P vs Xeon E5-2407

AMD

A12-9720P

4 Cores4 Thrd2 WWMax: 3.6 GHz2016
VS
Intel

Xeon E5-2407

4 Cores4 Thrd80 WWMax: 2.2 GHz2012

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The A12-9720P is positioned at rank 1016 and the Xeon E5-2407 is on rank 852, so the Xeon E5-2407 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar A12-9720P

#1004
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
2238%
#1005
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
2205%
#1006
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
2024%
#1007
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
2015%
#1008
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
1997%
#1010
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
1928%
#1011
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
1849%
#1012
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
1846%
#1013
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
1796%
#1016
A12-9720P
MSRP: $200|Avg: $25
100%
#1017
Core i5-4300M
MSRP: $227|Avg: N/A
99%
#1018
Celeron 1005M
MSRP: $86|Avg: N/A
99%
#1019
Athlon 64 X2 TK-42
MSRP: $60|Avg: $10
99%
#1020
Athlon Neo MV-40
MSRP: $100|Avg: $5
97%
#1021
Core i7-4860EQ
MSRP: $434|Avg: $80
97%
#1022
Pentium SU2700
MSRP: $100|Avg: $10
97%
#1023
A4-1250
MSRP: $100|Avg: $30
96%
#1025
Core i5-4200M
MSRP: $225|Avg: N/A
95%
#1026
Celeron 1000M
MSRP: $86|Avg: N/A
95%
#1028
Celeron B840
MSRP: $86|Avg: $15
94%
#1029
Celeron M 743
MSRP: $107|Avg: $15
94%
#1030
Core i7-3612QM
MSRP: $378|Avg: N/A
94%
#1031
Pentium 967
MSRP: $134|Avg: $10
93%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Xeon E5-2407

#1
Xeon Platinum 8454H
MSRP: $6540|Avg: N/A
19532%
#6
Xeon Gold 6240R
MSRP: $2444|Avg: N/A
3688%
#10
Xeon 6337P
MSRP: $60|Avg: $5
3277%
#15
EPYC 9174F
MSRP: $194|Avg: $30
2531%
#481
Xeon Platinum 8160M
MSRP: $5000|Avg: $350
100%
#482
Xeon 6724P
MSRP: $3622|Avg: $3622
99%
#483
EPYC 9634
MSRP: $10304|Avg: $3949
98%
#484
EPYC 7773X
MSRP: $8800|Avg: $8800
98%
#485
Xeon Gold 6258R
MSRP: $3950|Avg: $1400
96%
#486
EPYC 9175F
MSRP: $4256|Avg: $3703
96%
#852
Xeon E5-2407
MSRP: $250|Avg: $25
100%
#857
Xeon 5120
MSRP: $107|Avg: $15
98%
#859
Xeon W3530
MSRP: $294|Avg: $10
98%
#861
Xeon W3520
MSRP: $284|Avg: $15
97%
#862
Xeon E3-1271 v3
MSRP: $727|Avg: $831
97%
#863
Xeon E5603
MSRP: $188|Avg: N/A
97%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Use Case Distinction: This is a comparison between a Professional Workstation processor ($25) and a Consumer Desktop CPU. The Xeon E5-2407 is engineered for massive parallel workloads (rendering, scientific simulations), offering significantly higher core counts.
InsightA12-9720PXeon E5-2407
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Bristol Ridge (2016−2019) / 28 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Sandy Bridge-EN (2012) / 32 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The A12-9720P ($25), however, is optimized for mixed workloads and gaming. For most users, it offers superior single-thread performance and responsiveness at a fraction of the cost ($0 less, 0% cheaper), making it the better choice for daily use and gaming.
InsightA12-9720PXeon E5-2407
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Better overall value (+1%)
Upfront Cost
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of A12-9720P and Xeon E5-2407

AMD

A12-9720P

The A12-9720P is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Bristol Ridge (2016−2019) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.7 GHz, with boost up to 3.6 GHz. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: FP4. Thermal design power (TDP): 2 MB. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 2,622 points. Launch price was $130.

Intel

Xeon E5-2407

The Xeon E5-2407 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 14 May 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge-EN (2012) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 2.2 GHz. L3 cache: 10240 kB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1356. Thermal design power (TDP): 80 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,659 points. Launch price was $335.

Processing Power

Both the A12-9720P and Xeon E5-2407 share an identical 4-core/4-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3.6 GHz on the A12-9720P versus 2.2 GHz on the Xeon E5-2407 — a 48.3% clock advantage for the A12-9720P (base: 2.7 GHz vs 2.2 GHz). The A12-9720P uses the Bristol Ridge (2016−2019) architecture (28 nm), while the Xeon E5-2407 uses Sandy Bridge-EN (2012) (32 nm). In PassMark, the A12-9720P scores 2,622 against the Xeon E5-2407's 2,659 — a 1.4% lead for the Xeon E5-2407.

FeatureA12-9720PXeon E5-2407
Cores / Threads
4 / 4
4 / 4
Boost Clock
3.6 GHz+64%
2.2 GHz
Base Clock
2.7 GHz+23%
2.2 GHz
L3 Cache
10240 kB (total)
L2 Cache
2 MB+700%
256 kB (per core)
Process
28 nm-13%
32 nm
Architecture
Bristol Ridge (2016−2019)
Sandy Bridge-EN (2012)
PassMark
2,622
2,659+1%
Geekbench 6 Single
529
🧠

Memory & Platform

The A12-9720P uses the FP4 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon E5-2407 uses LGA1356 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureA12-9720PXeon E5-2407
Socket
FP4
LGA1356
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0+50%
PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR4-1866
Max RAM Capacity
16 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
8
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: AMD-V (A12-9720P) / not specified (Xeon E5-2407). The A12-9720P includes integrated graphics (Radeon R7), while the Xeon E5-2407 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: A12-9720P targets Laptop. Direct competitor: A12-9720P rivals Core i5-7200U.

FeatureA12-9720PXeon E5-2407
Integrated GPU
Yes
IGPU Model
Radeon R7
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
AMD-V
Target Use
Laptop
💰

Value Analysis

The A12-9720P launched at $200 MSRP, while the Xeon E5-2407 debuted at $250. At current prices ($25 vs $25), the Xeon E5-2407 is $0 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the A12-9720P delivers 104.9 pts/$ vs 106.4 pts/$ for the Xeon E5-2407 — making the Xeon E5-2407 the 1.4% better value option.

FeatureA12-9720PXeon E5-2407
MSRP
$200-20%
$250
Avg Price (30d)
$25
$25
Performance per Dollar
104.9
106.4+1%
Release Date
2016
2012