A12-9720P
VS
Core i7-3687U

A12-9720P vs Core i7-3687U

AMD

A12-9720P

4 Cores4 Thrd2 WWMax: 3.6 GHz2016
VS
Intel

Core i7-3687U

2 Cores4 Thrd512 WWMax: 3.3 GHz2013

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The A12-9720P is positioned at rank 1016 and the Core i7-3687U is on rank 654, so the Core i7-3687U offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar A12-9720P

#1004
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
2238%
#1005
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
2205%
#1006
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
2024%
#1007
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
2015%
#1008
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
1997%
#1010
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
1928%
#1011
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
1849%
#1012
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
1846%
#1013
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
1796%
#1016
A12-9720P
MSRP: $200|Avg: $25
100%
#1017
Core i5-4300M
MSRP: $227|Avg: N/A
99%
#1018
Celeron 1005M
MSRP: $86|Avg: N/A
99%
#1019
Athlon 64 X2 TK-42
MSRP: $60|Avg: $10
99%
#1020
Athlon Neo MV-40
MSRP: $100|Avg: $5
97%
#1021
Core i7-4860EQ
MSRP: $434|Avg: $80
97%
#1022
Pentium SU2700
MSRP: $100|Avg: $10
97%
#1023
A4-1250
MSRP: $100|Avg: $30
96%
#1025
Core i5-4200M
MSRP: $225|Avg: N/A
95%
#1026
Celeron 1000M
MSRP: $86|Avg: N/A
95%
#1028
Celeron B840
MSRP: $86|Avg: $15
94%
#1029
Celeron M 743
MSRP: $107|Avg: $15
94%
#1030
Core i7-3612QM
MSRP: $378|Avg: N/A
94%
#1031
Pentium 967
MSRP: $134|Avg: $10
93%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Core i7-3687U

#642
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
896%
#643
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
882%
#644
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
810%
#645
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
806%
#646
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
799%
#648
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
772%
#649
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
740%
#650
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
739%
#651
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
719%
#654
Core i7-3687U
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#662
Athlon II P360
MSRP: $60|Avg: $10
99%
#665
Athlon X2 QL-64
MSRP: $50|Avg: $15
99%
#666
Core 3 N350
MSRP: $225|Avg: $220
98%
#668
FX-7500
MSRP: $100|Avg: $25
98%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Trade-off: The Core i7-3687U leads in gaming performance. However, the A12-9720P is the stronger candidate for professional workloads, offering 0% greater multi-core processing power.
InsightA12-9720PCore i7-3687U
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Better multi-core power
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price
⚠️ Higher cost ($25)
More affordable ($0)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Bristol Ridge (2016−2019) / 28 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) / 22 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

InsightA12-9720PCore i7-3687U
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
⚠️ Higher cost ($25)
More affordable ($0)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of A12-9720P and Core i7-3687U

AMD

A12-9720P

The A12-9720P is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Bristol Ridge (2016−2019) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.7 GHz, with boost up to 3.6 GHz. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: FP4. Thermal design power (TDP): 2 MB. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 2,622 points. Launch price was $130.

Intel

Core i7-3687U

The Core i7-3687U is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 8 January 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.3 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1023. Thermal design power (TDP): 17 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,621 points. Launch price was $69.

Processing Power

The A12-9720P packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Core i7-3687U offers 2 cores / 4 threads — the A12-9720P has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.6 GHz on the A12-9720P versus 3.3 GHz on the Core i7-3687U — a 8.7% clock advantage for the A12-9720P (base: 2.7 GHz vs 2.1 GHz). The A12-9720P uses the Bristol Ridge (2016−2019) architecture (28 nm), while the Core i7-3687U uses Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) (22 nm). In PassMark, the A12-9720P scores 2,622 against the Core i7-3687U's 2,621 — a 0% lead for the A12-9720P. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 529 vs 640, a 19% lead for the Core i7-3687U that directly translates to higher frame rates.

FeatureA12-9720PCore i7-3687U
Cores / Threads
4 / 4+100%
2 / 4
Boost Clock
3.6 GHz+9%
3.3 GHz
Base Clock
2.7 GHz+29%
2.1 GHz
L3 Cache
4 MB (total)
L2 Cache
2 MB+700%
256K (per core)
Process
28 nm
22 nm-21%
Architecture
Bristol Ridge (2016−2019)
Ivy Bridge (2012−2013)
PassMark
2,622
2,621
Geekbench 6 Single
529
640+21%
Geekbench 6 Multi
1,240
🧠

Memory & Platform

The A12-9720P uses the FP4 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i7-3687U uses BGA1023 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-1866 on the A12-9720P versus DDR3L-1600 on the Core i7-3687U — the A12-9720P supports 28.6% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core i7-3687U supports up to 32 GB of RAM compared to 16 GB 66.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 8 (A12-9720P) vs 16 (Core i7-3687U) — the Core i7-3687U offers 8 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives.

FeatureA12-9720PCore i7-3687U
Socket
FP4
BGA1023
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0
PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR4-1866+33%
DDR3L-1600
Max RAM Capacity
16 GB
32 GB+100%
RAM Channels
2
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
8
16+100%
🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: AMD-V (A12-9720P) vs VT-x, VT-d (Core i7-3687U). Both include integrated graphics Radeon R7 (A12-9720P) and HD Graphics 4000 (Core i7-3687U) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: A12-9720P targets Laptop, Core i7-3687U targets Enthusiast. Direct competitor: A12-9720P rivals Core i5-7200U; Core i7-3687U rivals Ryzen 7 3700U.

FeatureA12-9720PCore i7-3687U
Integrated GPU
Yes
Yes
IGPU Model
Radeon R7
HD Graphics 4000
Unlocked
No
No
AVX-512
No
No
Virtualization
AMD-V
VT-x, VT-d
Target Use
Laptop
Enthusiast