
Athlon X4 740

Core i5-760
Athlon X4 740 vs Core i5-760 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Athlon X4 740 vs Core i5-760 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Athlon X4 740 vs Core i5-760: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Athlon X4 740
2012Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +4.8% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Costs $159 less on MSRP ($71 MSRP vs $230 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 221.4% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 37.3 vs 11.6 PassMark/$ ($71 MSRP vs $230 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 95W, a 30W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (2,646 vs 2,667).
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-760.
Core i5-760
2010Why buy it
- ✅+0.8% higher PassMark.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Athlon X4 740.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Athlon X4 740 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 11.6 vs 37.3 PassMark/$ ($230 MSRP vs $71 MSRP).
- ❌46.2% higher power demand at 95W vs 65W.
Quick Answers
So, is Athlon X4 740 better than Core i5-760?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Athlon X4 740 vs Core i5-760 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Athlon X4 740
The Athlon X4 740 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Trinity (2012−2013) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L2 cache: 4 MB (total). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: FM2. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-1866. Passmark benchmark score: 2,646 points. Launch price was $149.

Core i5-760
The Core i5-760 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 18 July 2010 (15 years ago). It is based on the Lynnfield (2009−2010) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 3.33 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1156. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,667 points. Launch price was $230.
Processing Power
Both the Athlon X4 740 and Core i5-760 share an identical 4-core/4-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3.7 GHz on the Athlon X4 740 versus 3.33 GHz on the Core i5-760 — a 10.5% clock advantage for the Athlon X4 740 (base: 3.2 GHz vs 2.8 GHz). The Athlon X4 740 uses the Trinity (2012−2013) architecture (32 nm), while the Core i5-760 uses Lynnfield (2009−2010) (45 nm). In PassMark, the Athlon X4 740 scores 2,646 against the Core i5-760's 2,667 — a 0.8% lead for the Core i5-760.
| Feature | Athlon X4 740 | Core i5-760 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 4 | 4 / 4 |
| Boost Clock | 3.7 GHz+11% | 3.33 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.2 GHz+14% | 2.8 GHz |
| L3 Cache | — | 8 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB (total)+1500% | 256 kB (per core) |
| Process | 32 nm-29% | 45 nm |
| Architecture | Trinity (2012−2013) | Lynnfield (2009−2010) |
| PassMark | 2,646 | 2,667 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 470 |
Memory & Platform
The Athlon X4 740 uses the FM2 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Core i5-760 uses LGA1156 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-1866 on the Athlon X4 740 versus DDR3-1333 on the Core i5-760 — the Athlon X4 740 supports 40% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Athlon X4 740 supports up to 64 GB of RAM compared to 16 GB — 300% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 16 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: AMD FM2 (Athlon X4 740) and P55,H55,H57,Q57 (Core i5-760).
| Feature | Athlon X4 740 | Core i5-760 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FM2 | LGA1156 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 2.0 | PCIe 2.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR3-1866+40% | DDR3-1333 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 64 GB+300% | 16 GB |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | No | No |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | 16 |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: AMD-V (Athlon X4 740) vs VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i5-760). Primary use case: Athlon X4 740 targets Desktop, Core i5-760 targets Legacy Desktop. Direct competitor: Core i5-760 rivals Phenom II X4 970.
| Feature | Athlon X4 740 | Core i5-760 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| IGPU Model | — | None |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | AMD-V | VT-x, VT-d, EPT |
| Target Use | Desktop | Legacy Desktop |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Athlon X4 740 was priced at $71, while the Core i5-760 came in at $230. On launch pricing ($71 vs $230), Athlon X4 740 was $159 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Athlon X4 740 delivers 37.3 pts/$ vs 11.6 pts/$ for the Core i5-760 — making the Athlon X4 740 the 105.1% better value option.
| Feature | Athlon X4 740 | Core i5-760 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $71-69% | $230 |
| Performance per Dollar | 37.3+222% | 11.6 |
| Release Date | 2012 | 2010 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
















