Athlon X4 740 vs Pro A12-8800B

Athlon X4 740 vs Pro A12-8800B Performance Spectrum

Athlon X4 740

4 / 4

2,646

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Pro A12-8800B

4 / 4

2,667

+0.8%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Athlon X4 740 vs Pro A12-8800B FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Athlon X4 740 vs Pro A12-8800B: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Athlon X4 740

2012

Why buy it

✅Costs $329 less on MSRP ($71 MSRP vs $400 MSRP).
✅Delivers 458.9% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 37.3 vs 6.7 PassMark/$ ($71 MSRP vs $400 MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (2,646 vs 2,667).
❌3150% higher power demand at 65W vs 2W.
❌No integrated graphics, while Pro A12-8800B can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Pro A12-8800B

2015

Why buy it

✅+0.8% higher PassMark.
✅Draws 2W instead of 65W, a 63W reduction.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon R7 Graphics, while Athlon X4 740 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 6.7 vs 37.3 PassMark/$ ($400 MSRP vs $71 MSRP).

Quick Answers

So, is Pro A12-8800B better than Athlon X4 740?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Athlon X4 740 is ahead with a 0.9% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Pro A12-8800B pulls ahead with 0.8% better PassMark.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Pro A12-8800B is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.8% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Pro A12-8800B is still the much better call for a fresh build. Pro A12-8800B comes in 463.4% more expensive on MSRP at $400 MSRP versus $71 MSRP, and it still gives you 0.8% better PassMark. Athlon X4 740 only looks stronger on raw value math because it is extremely cheap, but that usually means used-market pricing on an obsolete 2012 platform. Even with 458.9% better value on paper (37.3 vs 6.7 PassMark/$), it really only makes sense as a cheap stopgap or a niche existing-platform option for someone already on FM2.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Pro A12-8800B makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2015 vs 2012) and more multi-core headroom with 4 cores / 4 threads instead of 4/4. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Athlon X4 740 vs Pro A12-8800B Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Athlon X4 740

The Athlon X4 740 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Trinity (2012−2013) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L2 cache: 4 MB (total). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: FM2. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-1866. Passmark benchmark score: 2,646 points. Launch price was $149.

Pro A12-8800B

The Pro A12-8800B is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 3 June 2015 (10 years ago). It is based on the Carrizo (2015−2018) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.4 GHz. L2 cache: 2048 kB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: FP4. Thermal design power (TDP): 2 MB. Memory support: DDR3/DDR3L-2133. Passmark benchmark score: 2,667 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Athlon X4 740 and Pro A12-8800B share an identical 4-core/4-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3.7 GHz on the Athlon X4 740 versus 3.4 GHz on the Pro A12-8800B — a 8.5% clock advantage for the Athlon X4 740 (base: 3.2 GHz vs 2.1 GHz). The Athlon X4 740 uses the Trinity (2012−2013) architecture (32 nm), while the Pro A12-8800B uses Carrizo (2015−2018) (28 nm). In PassMark, the Athlon X4 740 scores 2,646 against the Pro A12-8800B's 2,667 — a 0.8% lead for the Pro A12-8800B.

Feature	Athlon X4 740	Pro A12-8800B
Cores / Threads	4 / 4	4 / 4
Boost Clock	3.7 GHz+9%	3.4 GHz
Base Clock	3.2 GHz+52%	2.1 GHz
L2 Cache	4 MB (total)+100%	2048 kB
Process	32 nm	28 nm-13%
Architecture	Trinity (2012−2013)	Carrizo (2015−2018)
PassMark	2,646	2,667
Geekbench 6 Single	—	528
Geekbench 6 Multi	—	1,144

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Athlon X4 740 uses the FM2 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Pro A12-8800B uses FP4 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-1866 on the Athlon X4 740 versus DDR3-2133 on the Pro A12-8800B — the Pro A12-8800B supports 14.3% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 64 GB of RAM. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 16 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: AMD FM2 (Athlon X4 740) and Socket FP4 (Pro A12-8800B).

Feature	Athlon X4 740	Pro A12-8800B
Socket	FM2	FP4
PCIe Generation	PCIe 2.0	PCIe 3.0+50%
Max RAM Speed	DDR3-1866	DDR3-2133+14%
Max RAM Capacity	64 GB	64 GB
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	No	No
PCIe Lanes	16	16

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support AMD-V virtualization. The Pro A12-8800B includes integrated graphics (Radeon R7 Graphics), while the Athlon X4 740 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Athlon X4 740 targets Desktop.

Feature	Athlon X4 740	Pro A12-8800B
Integrated GPU	No	Yes
IGPU Model	—	Radeon R7 Graphics
Unlocked	No	No
AVX-512	No	No
Virtualization	AMD-V	AMD-V
Target Use	Desktop	—

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Athlon X4 740 was priced at $71, while the Pro A12-8800B came in at $400. On launch pricing ($71 vs $400), Athlon X4 740 was $329 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Athlon X4 740 delivers 37.3 pts/$ vs 6.7 pts/$ for the Pro A12-8800B — making the Athlon X4 740 the 139.3% better value option.

Feature	Athlon X4 740	Pro A12-8800B
MSRP	$71-82%	$400
Performance per Dollar	37.3+457%	6.7
Release Date	2012	2015

Search Athlon X4 740 on Amazon

Search Pro A12-8800B on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.