Chipversus Index
Jump to Section

Athlon XP 1800+ vs C-30

CPUCPUGPUGPU
AMD

Athlon XP 1800+

1 Cores1 Thrd66 WWMax: 1.53 GHz2001
Similar parts
·······
Buy on Amazon
VS
AMD

C-30

1 Cores1 Thrd512 WWMax: 1.2 GHz2011
Similar parts
······
Buy on Amazon

Athlon XP 1800+ vs C-30 Performance Spectrum

Athlon XP 1800+
1 / 1
225
+11.9%
brand logoAthlon XP 1600+
brand logoRyzen 7 4700GE
brand logoRyzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX
brand logoRyzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX
brand logoRyzen Threadripper 3990X
brand logoRyzen Threadripper 7970X
brand logoRyzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX
brand logoRyzen Threadripper 7980X
C-30
1 / 1
201
0.0%
brand logoRyzen 7 4700GE
brand logoRyzen 9 5900X
brand logoRyzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX
brand logoRyzen Threadripper 3990X
brand logoRyzen Threadripper 7970X
brand logoRyzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX
brand logoRyzen Threadripper 7980X
brand logoRyzen Threadripper PRO 9995WX

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Athlon XP 1800+ vs C-30: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Athlon XP 1800+

2001

Why buy it

  • ✅Better for gaming: +20.0% higher average FPS across 49 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • ✅Draws 66W instead of 512W, a 446W reduction.
  • ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Stock), unlike C-30.

Trade-offs

  • ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 0.9 vs 4.0 PassMark/$ ($252 MSRP vs $50 MSRP).
  • ❌No integrated graphics, while C-30 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

C-30

2011

Why buy it

  • ✅Costs $202 less on MSRP ($50 MSRP vs $252 MSRP).
  • ✅Delivers 350.2% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 4.0 vs 0.9 PassMark/$ ($50 MSRP vs $252 MSRP).
  • ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (4 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
  • ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon HD 6250, while Athlon XP 1800+ needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

  • ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Athlon XP 1800+ across 49 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • ❌Lower PassMark (201 vs 225).
  • ❌675.8% higher power demand at 512W vs 66W.
  • ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Athlon XP 1800+.

Quick Answers

So, is Athlon XP 1800+ better than C-30?
Yes. Athlon XP 1800+ is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 20.0% average FPS lead across 49 shared CPU game tests in our data and 11.9% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.
Which one is better for gaming?
If gaming is the priority, Athlon XP 1800+ is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 20.0% more average FPS across 49 shared CPU game tests.
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Athlon XP 1800+ is the stronger fit. You are getting 11.9% better PassMark, backed by 1 cores and 1 threads.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Athlon XP 1800+ is the easy recommendation for a fresh desktop build. Athlon XP 1800+ comes in 404.0% more expensive on MSRP at $252 MSRP versus $50 MSRP, and it still gives you a 20.0% average FPS lead across 49 shared CPU game tests in our data. C-30 only looks good on raw value math because it is a cheap legacy laptop chip, not because it is a real desktop gaming recommendation. It simply does not keep up in modern games, especially when the gap is already 20.0% in the shared gaming data.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
C-30 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2011 vs 2001). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Athlon XP 1800+ vs C-30 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

AMD

Athlon XP 1800+

The Athlon XP 1800+ is manufactured by AMD. It was released in Janeiro 2001 (24 years ago). It is based on the Thoroughbred (2001−2002) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 1.53 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 256 kB. Built on 180 nm process technology. Socket: A. Thermal design power (TDP): 66 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 225 points. Launch price was $59.

AMD

C-30

The C-30 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 4 January 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Ontario (2011−2012) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 1.2 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 40 nm process technology. Socket: FT1. Thermal design power (TDP): 512 kB. Memory support: DDR3 Single-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 201 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Athlon XP 1800+ and C-30 share an identical 1-core/1-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 1.53 GHz on the Athlon XP 1800+ versus 1.2 GHz on the C-30 — a 24.2% clock advantage for the Athlon XP 1800+. The Athlon XP 1800+ uses the Thoroughbred (2001−2002) architecture (180 nm), while the C-30 uses Ontario (2011−2012) (40 nm). In PassMark, the Athlon XP 1800+ scores 225 against the C-30's 201 — a 11.3% lead for the Athlon XP 1800+. Both processors carry 0 kB of L3 cache.

FeatureAthlon XP 1800+C-30
Cores / Threads
1 / 1
1 / 1
Boost Clock
1.53 GHz+28%
1.2 GHz
L3 Cache
0 kB
0 kB
L2 Cache
256 kB
512 kB+100%
Process
180 nm
40 nm-78%
Architecture
Thoroughbred (2001−2002)
Ontario (2011−2012)
PassMark
225+12%
201
Geekbench 6 Single
180
—
Geekbench 6 Multi
651
—
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Athlon XP 1800+ uses the A socket (PCIe 1.1), while the C-30 uses FT1 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR1 on the Athlon XP 1800+ versus DDR3-1066 on the C-30 — the C-30 supports 106500% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The C-30 supports up to 4 GB of RAM compared to 2 GB — 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 1-channel memory with ECC support. Chipset compatibility: KT133,KT266,nForce2 (Athlon XP 1800+) and AMD BGA413 (C-30).

FeatureAthlon XP 1800+C-30
Socket
A
FT1
PCIe Generation
PCIe 1.1
PCIe 2.0+82%
Max RAM Speed
DDR1
DDR3-1066+106500%
Max RAM Capacity
2 GB
4 GB+100%
RAM Channels
1
1
ECC Support
No
No
PCIe Lanes
—
4
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: No (Athlon XP 1800+) / not specified (C-30). The C-30 includes integrated graphics (Radeon HD 6250), while the Athlon XP 1800+ requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Athlon XP 1800+ targets Budget. Direct competitor: Athlon XP 1800+ rivals Pentium D 830.

FeatureAthlon XP 1800+C-30
Integrated GPU
No
Yes
IGPU Model
—
Radeon HD 6250
Unlocked
No
—
AVX-512
No
—
Virtualization
No
—
Target Use
Budget
—
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Athlon XP 1800+ was priced at $252, while the C-30 came in at $50. On launch pricing ($252 vs $50), C-30 was $202 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Athlon XP 1800+ delivers 0.9 pts/$ vs 4.0 pts/$ for the C-30 — making the C-30 the 127.3% better value option.

FeatureAthlon XP 1800+C-30
MSRP
$252
$50-80%
Performance per Dollar
0.9
4.0+344%
Release Date
2001
2011
Search Athlon XP 1800+ on AmazonSearch C-30 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.