Athlon XP 1800+
Z-01
Athlon XP 1800+ vs Z-01 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Athlon XP 1800+ vs Z-01 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Valorant
ARC Raiders
Cyberpunk 2077
Dead by Daylight
Delta Force
Elden Ring
Athlon XP 1800+ vs Z-01: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Athlon XP 1800+
2001Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +20.0% higher average FPS across 18 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Stock), unlike Z-01.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 0.9 vs 4.3 PassMark/$ ($252 MSRP vs $50 MSRP).
- ❌1000% higher power demand at 66W vs 6W.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Z-01 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Z-01
2011Why buy it
- ✅Costs $202 less on MSRP ($50 MSRP vs $252 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 381.6% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 4.3 vs 0.9 PassMark/$ ($50 MSRP vs $252 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 6W instead of 66W, a 60W reduction.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (4 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon HD 6250, while Athlon XP 1800+ needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Athlon XP 1800+ across 18 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower Geekbench multi-core (180 vs 651).
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Athlon XP 1800+.
Quick Answers
So, is Athlon XP 1800+ better than Z-01?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Athlon XP 1800+ vs Z-01 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
Athlon XP 1800+
The Athlon XP 1800+ is manufactured by AMD. It was released in Janeiro 2001 (24 years ago). It is based on the Thoroughbred (2001−2002) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 1.53 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 256 kB. Built on 180 nm process technology. Socket: A. Thermal design power (TDP): 66 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 225 points. Launch price was $59.
Z-01
The Z-01 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 1 June 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Desna (2011) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 1 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 40 nm process technology. Socket: FT1. Thermal design power (TDP): 6 Watt. Memory support: DDR3 Single-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 215 points. Launch price was $69.
Processing Power
The Athlon XP 1800+ packs 1 cores / 1 threads, while the Z-01 offers 2 cores / 2 threads — the Z-01 has 1 more core. Boost clocks reach 1.53 GHz on the Athlon XP 1800+ versus 1 GHz on the Z-01 — a 41.9% clock advantage for the Athlon XP 1800+. The Athlon XP 1800+ uses the Thoroughbred (2001−2002) architecture (180 nm), while the Z-01 uses Desna (2011) (40 nm). In PassMark, the Athlon XP 1800+ scores 225 against the Z-01's 215 — a 4.5% lead for the Athlon XP 1800+. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 180 vs 100, a 57.1% lead for the Athlon XP 1800+ that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 651 vs 180 (113.4% advantage for the Athlon XP 1800+). Both processors carry 0 kB of L3 cache.
| Feature | Athlon XP 1800+ | Z-01 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 1 / 1 | 2 / 2+100% |
| Boost Clock | 1.53 GHz+53% | 1 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 0 kB | 0 kB |
| L2 Cache | 256 kB | 1 MB+300% |
| Process | 180 nm | 40 nm-78% |
| Architecture | Thoroughbred (2001−2002) | Desna (2011) |
| PassMark | 225+5% | 215 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 180+80% | 100 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 651+262% | 180 |
Memory & Platform
The Athlon XP 1800+ uses the A socket (PCIe 1.1), while the Z-01 uses FT1 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR1 on the Athlon XP 1800+ versus DDR3-1066 on the Z-01 — the Z-01 supports 106500% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Z-01 supports up to 4 GB of RAM compared to 2 GB — 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 1-channel memory with ECC support. Chipset compatibility: KT133,KT266,nForce2 (Athlon XP 1800+) and Desna (Z-01).
| Feature | Athlon XP 1800+ | Z-01 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | A | FT1 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 1.1 | PCIe 2.0+82% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR1 | DDR3-1066+106500% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 2 GB | 4 GB+100% |
| RAM Channels | 1 | 1 |
| ECC Support | No | No |
| PCIe Lanes | — | 4 |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: No (Athlon XP 1800+) vs AMD-V (Z-01). The Z-01 includes integrated graphics (Radeon HD 6250), while the Athlon XP 1800+ requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Athlon XP 1800+ targets Budget, Z-01 targets Tablet/Netbook. Direct competitor: Athlon XP 1800+ rivals Pentium D 830.
| Feature | Athlon XP 1800+ | Z-01 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | Yes |
| IGPU Model | — | Radeon HD 6250 |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | No | AMD-V |
| Target Use | Budget | Tablet/Netbook |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Athlon XP 1800+ was priced at $252, while the Z-01 came in at $50. On launch pricing ($252 vs $50), Z-01 was $202 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Athlon XP 1800+ delivers 0.9 pts/$ vs 4.3 pts/$ for the Z-01 — making the Z-01 the 131.2% better value option.
| Feature | Athlon XP 1800+ | Z-01 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $252 | $50-80% |
| Performance per Dollar | 0.9 | 4.3+378% |
| Release Date | 2001 | 2011 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Athlon XP 1800+ and Z-01
