
Athlon XP 2800+

Core i5-10400F
Athlon XP 2800+ vs Core i5-10400F Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Athlon XP 2800+ vs Core i5-10400F FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Athlon XP 2800+ vs Core i5-10400F: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Athlon XP 2800+
2001Why buy it
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-10400F across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower Geekbench multi-core (250 vs 5,783).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 1.0 vs 81.4 PassMark/$ ($375 MSRP vs $160 MSRP).
Core i5-10400F
2020Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +1632.3% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Costs $215 less on MSRP ($160 MSRP vs $375 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 7936.0% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 81.4 vs 1.0 PassMark/$ ($160 MSRP vs $375 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 74W, a 9W reduction.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i5-10400F better than Athlon XP 2800+?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Athlon XP 2800+ vs Core i5-10400F Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Athlon XP 2800+
The Athlon XP 2800+ is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Barton (2001−2004) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 2.25 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512K. Built on 130 nm process technology. Socket: A. Thermal design power (TDP): 74 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 380 points. Launch price was $149.

Core i5-10400F
The Core i5-10400F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 30 April 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Comet Lake (2020−2025) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 4.3 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 13,029 points. Launch price was $155.
Processing Power
The Athlon XP 2800+ packs 1 cores / 1 threads, while the Core i5-10400F offers 6 cores / 12 threads — the Core i5-10400F has 5 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2.25 GHz on the Athlon XP 2800+ versus 4.3 GHz on the Core i5-10400F — a 62.6% clock advantage for the Core i5-10400F. The Athlon XP 2800+ uses the Barton (2001−2004) architecture (130 nm), while the Core i5-10400F uses Comet Lake (2020−2025) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Athlon XP 2800+ scores 380 against the Core i5-10400F's 13,029 — a 188.7% lead for the Core i5-10400F. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 250 vs 1,454, a 141.3% lead for the Core i5-10400F that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 250 vs 5,783 (183.4% advantage for the Core i5-10400F). L3 cache: 0 kB on the Athlon XP 2800+ vs 12 MB (total) on the Core i5-10400F.
| Feature | Athlon XP 2800+ | Core i5-10400F |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 1 / 1 | 6 / 12+500% |
| Boost Clock | 2.25 GHz | 4.3 GHz+91% |
| Base Clock | — | 2.9 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 0 kB | 12 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 512K+100% | 256K (per core) |
| Process | 130 nm | 14 nm-89% |
| Architecture | Barton (2001−2004) | Comet Lake (2020−2025) |
| PassMark | 380 | 13,029+3329% |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | — | 8,191 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 250 | 1,454+482% |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 250 | 5,783+2213% |
Memory & Platform
The Athlon XP 2800+ uses the A socket (PCIe 1.1), while the Core i5-10400F uses LGA1200 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR-333 on the Athlon XP 2800+ versus DDR4-2666 on the Core i5-10400F — the Core i5-10400F supports -900.6% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core i5-10400F supports up to 128 GB of RAM compared to 2 GB — 6300% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 1 (Athlon XP 2800+) vs 2 (Core i5-10400F). PCIe lanes: 0 (Athlon XP 2800+) vs 16 (Core i5-10400F) — the Core i5-10400F offers 16 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: KT400,nForce2 Ultra 400 (Athlon XP 2800+) and H410,B460,H470,Z490,H510,B560,H570,Z590 (Core i5-10400F).
| Feature | Athlon XP 2800+ | Core i5-10400F |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | A | LGA1200 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 1.1 | PCIe 3.0+173% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR-333 | DDR4-2666 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 2 GB | 128 GB+6300% |
| RAM Channels | 1 | 2+100% |
| ECC Support | No | No |
| PCIe Lanes | 0 | 16 |
Advanced Features
Only the Athlon XP 2800+ has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Virtualization support: None (Athlon XP 2800+) vs VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-10400F). Primary use case: Athlon XP 2800+ targets Legacy Desktop, Core i5-10400F targets Gaming. Direct competitor: Core i5-10400F rivals Ryzen 5 3600.
| Feature | Athlon XP 2800+ | Core i5-10400F |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| Unlocked | Yes | No |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | None | VT-x, VT-d |
| Target Use | Legacy Desktop | Gaming |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Athlon XP 2800+ was priced at $375, while the Core i5-10400F came in at $160. On launch pricing ($375 vs $160), Core i5-10400F was $215 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Athlon XP 2800+ delivers 1.0 pts/$ vs 81.4 pts/$ for the Core i5-10400F — making the Core i5-10400F the 195.1% better value option.
| Feature | Athlon XP 2800+ | Core i5-10400F |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $375 | $160-57% |
| Performance per Dollar | 1.0 | 81.4+8040% |
| Release Date | 2001 | 2020 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
















