Atom C3858 vs Core i5-3570K

Intel

Atom C3858

12 Cores12 Thrd25 WWMax: 2 GHz2017
VS
Intel

Core i5-3570K

4 Cores4 Thrd77 WWMax: 3.8 GHz2012
Similar parts
·······

Atom C3858 vs Core i5-3570K Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Atom C3858 vs Core i5-3570K FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Atom C3858 vs Core i5-3570K: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Atom C3858

2017

Why buy it

  • Better for gaming: +15.7% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • +100% larger total L3 cache (12 MB vs 6 MB).
  • Draws 25W instead of 77W, a 52W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • No integrated graphics, while Core i5-3570K can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
  • No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-3570K.

Core i5-3570K

2012

Why buy it

  • 33.3% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 12) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
  • Integrated graphics onboard with HD Graphics 4000, while Atom C3858 needs a discrete GPU.
  • Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Atom C3858.

Trade-offs

  • Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Atom C3858 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • Lower PassMark (4,971 vs 5,040).
  • Smaller total L3 cache (6 MB vs 12 MB).
  • Launch MSRP is still $225 MSRP, while Atom C3858 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
  • 208% higher power demand at 77W vs 25W.

Quick Answers

So, is Atom C3858 better than Core i5-3570K?
Yes. Atom C3858 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 15.7% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 1.4% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.
Which one is better for gaming?
If gaming is the priority, Atom C3858 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 15.7% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Atom C3858 is the stronger fit. You are getting 1.4% better PassMark, backed by 12 cores and 12 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 100% larger total L3 cache (12 MB vs 6 MB).
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Atom C3858 is still the much better call for a fresh build. Atom C3858 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $225 MSRP, and it still gives you a 15.7% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Core i5-3570K only looks stronger on raw value math because it is extremely cheap, but that usually means used-market pricing on an obsolete 2012 platform. Even with 100.0% better value on paper (22.1 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), it really only makes sense as a cheap stopgap or a niche existing-platform option for someone already on LGA1155.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Atom C3858 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2017 vs 2012), 100% larger total L3 cache (12 MB vs 6 MB), and more multi-core headroom with 12 cores / 12 threads instead of 4/4. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Atom C3858 vs Core i5-3570K Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Intel

Atom C3858

The Atom C3858 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 15 August 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Goldmont (2016−2017) architecture. It features 12 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 2 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB. L2 cache: 12 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1310. Thermal design power (TDP): 25 Watt. Memory support: DDR4: 2400. Passmark benchmark score: 5,040 points. Launch price was $332.

Intel

Core i5-3570K

The Core i5-3570K is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 29 April 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.4 GHz, with boost up to 3.8 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1155. Thermal design power (TDP): 77 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 4,971 points. Launch price was $235.

Processing Power

The Atom C3858 packs 12 cores / 12 threads, while the Core i5-3570K offers 4 cores / 4 threads — the Atom C3858 has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2 GHz on the Atom C3858 versus 3.8 GHz on the Core i5-3570K — a 62.1% clock advantage for the Core i5-3570K (base: 2 GHz vs 3.4 GHz). The Atom C3858 uses the Goldmont (2016−2017) architecture (14 nm), while the Core i5-3570K uses Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Atom C3858 scores 5,040 against the Core i5-3570K's 4,971 — a 1.4% lead for the Atom C3858. L3 cache: 12 MB on the Atom C3858 vs 6 MB (total) on the Core i5-3570K.

FeatureAtom C3858Core i5-3570K
Cores / Threads
12 / 12+200%
4 / 4
Boost Clock
2 GHz
3.8 GHz+90%
Base Clock
2 GHz
3.4 GHz+70%
L3 Cache
12 MB+100%
6 MB (total)
L2 Cache
12 MB
256K (per core)+2033%
Process
14 nm-36%
22 nm
Architecture
Goldmont (2016−2017)
Ivy Bridge (2012−2013)
PassMark
5,040+1%
4,971
Geekbench 6 Single
1,000
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Atom C3858 uses the FCBGA1310 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i5-3570K uses LGA1155 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-2400 on the Atom C3858 versus DDR3-1600 on the Core i5-3570K — the Atom C3858 supports 50% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Atom C3858 supports up to 256 GB of RAM compared to 32 GB 700% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 12 (Atom C3858) vs 16 (Core i5-3570K) — the Core i5-3570K offers 4 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: Intel FCBGA1310 (Atom C3858) and Z75,Z77 (Core i5-3570K).

FeatureAtom C3858Core i5-3570K
Socket
FCBGA1310
LGA1155
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0
PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR4-2400+50%
DDR3-1600
Max RAM Capacity
256 GB+700%
32 GB
RAM Channels
2
2
ECC Support
Yes
No
PCIe Lanes
12
16+33%
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Atom C3858) / VT-x, EPT (Core i5-3570K). The Core i5-3570K includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics 4000), while the Atom C3858 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-3570K targets Legacy Gaming Desktop. Direct competitor: Core i5-3570K rivals FX-8350.

FeatureAtom C3858Core i5-3570K
Integrated GPU
No
Yes
IGPU Model
HD Graphics 4000
Unlocked
Yes
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
VT-x, EPT
Target Use
Legacy Gaming Desktop