
Atom E3815

Ryzen 5 5600
Atom E3815 vs Ryzen 5 5600 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Atom E3815 vs Ryzen 5 5600 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Atom E3815 vs Ryzen 5 5600: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Atom E3815
2013Why buy it
- β Integrated graphics onboard with Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail), while Ryzen 5 5600 needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- βWorse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 5 5600 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- βLower PassMark (365 vs 21,550).
- β687.7% higher power demand at 512W vs 65W.
- βNo boxed cooler included, unlike Ryzen 5 5600.
Ryzen 5 5600
2022Why buy it
- β Better for gaming: +2260.2% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- β Draws 65W instead of 512W, a 447W reduction.
- β 500% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 4) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- β Includes a boxed cooler (Wraith Stealth), unlike Atom E3815.
Trade-offs
- βLaunch MSRP is still $199 MSRP, while Atom E3815 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- βNo integrated graphics, while Atom E3815 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 5 5600 better than Atom E3815?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Atom E3815 vs Ryzen 5 5600 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Atom E3815
The Atom E3815 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 8 October 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Bay Trail-I (2013) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 1.47 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1170. Thermal design power (TDP): 512 kB. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 365 points. Launch price was $134.


Ryzen 5 5600
The Ryzen 5 5600 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 20 April 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Vermeer (2020β2025) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 21,550 points. Launch price was $299.
Processing Power
The Atom E3815 packs 1 cores / 1 threads, while the Ryzen 5 5600 offers 6 cores / 12 threads β the Ryzen 5 5600 has 5 more cores. Boost clocks reach 1.47 GHz on the Atom E3815 versus 4.4 GHz on the Ryzen 5 5600 β a 99.8% clock advantage for the Ryzen 5 5600. The Atom E3815 uses the Bay Trail-I (2013) architecture (22 nm), while the Ryzen 5 5600 uses Vermeer (2020β2025) (7 nm). In PassMark, the Atom E3815 scores 365 against the Ryzen 5 5600's 21,550 β a 193.3% lead for the Ryzen 5 5600. L3 cache: 0 kB on the Atom E3815 vs 32 MB (total) on the Ryzen 5 5600.
| Feature | Atom E3815 | Ryzen 5 5600 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 1 / 1 | 6 / 12+500% |
| Boost Clock | 1.47 GHz | 4.4 GHz+199% |
| Base Clock | β | 3.5 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 0 kB | 32 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 512 kB (per core) | 512K (per core) |
| Process | 22 nm | 7 nm-68% |
| Architecture | Bay Trail-I (2013) | Vermeer (2020β2025) |
| PassMark | 365 | 21,550+5804% |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | β | 11,077 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | β | 2,052 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | β | 8,600 |
Memory & Platform
The Atom E3815 uses the FCBGA1170 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Ryzen 5 5600 uses AM4 (PCIe 4.0) β making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3L-1066 on the Atom E3815 versus DDR4-3200 on the Ryzen 5 5600 β the Ryzen 5 5600 supports 200.2% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Ryzen 5 5600 supports up to 128 GB of RAM compared to 8 GB β 1500% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 1 (Atom E3815) vs 2 (Ryzen 5 5600). PCIe lanes: 4 (Atom E3815) vs 24 (Ryzen 5 5600) β the Ryzen 5 5600 offers 20 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: Intel FCBGA1170 (Atom E3815) and B550,X570,B450,X470,A520 (Ryzen 5 5600).
| Feature | Atom E3815 | Ryzen 5 5600 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FCBGA1170 | AM4 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 2.0 | PCIe 4.0+100% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR3L-1066 | DDR4-3200+200% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 8 GB | 128 GB+1500% |
| RAM Channels | 1 | 2+100% |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 4 | 24+500% |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: not specified (Atom E3815) / AMD-V (Ryzen 5 5600). The Atom E3815 includes integrated graphics (Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail)), while the Ryzen 5 5600 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Ryzen 5 5600 targets Desktop.
| Feature | Atom E3815 | Ryzen 5 5600 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | No |
| IGPU Model | Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail) | β |
| Unlocked | β | Yes |
| AVX-512 | β | No |
| Virtualization | β | AMD-V |
| Target Use | β | Desktop |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.













