Atom E3815 vs Sempron LE-1100

Intel

Atom E3815

1 Cores1 Thrd512 WWMax: 1.47 GHz2013
Similar parts
·······
VS
AMD

Sempron LE-1100

1 Cores1 Thrd45 WWMax: 1.9 GHz2007
Similar parts
·······

Atom E3815 vs Sempron LE-1100 Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Atom E3815 vs Sempron LE-1100 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Atom E3815 vs Sempron LE-1100: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Atom E3815

2013

Why buy it

  • 100+% more PCIe lanes (4 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
  • Integrated graphics onboard with Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail), while Sempron LE-1100 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

  • Lower PassMark (365 vs 376).
  • 1037.8% higher power demand at 512W vs 45W.

Sempron LE-1100

2007

Why buy it

  • Draws 45W instead of 512W, a 467W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • No integrated graphics, while Atom E3815 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Sempron LE-1100 better than Atom E3815?
Yes. Sempron LE-1100 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you 3% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.
Which one is better for gaming?
If gaming is the priority, Sempron LE-1100 has the edge because it leads the single-thread side of this matchup with 29.3% higher max boost clock.
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Sempron LE-1100 is the stronger fit. You are getting 3% better PassMark, backed by 1 cores and 1 threads.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Sempron LE-1100 still makes the most sense overall. Sempron LE-1100 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you 3.0% higher PassMark.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Atom E3815 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2013 vs 2007). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Atom E3815 vs Sempron LE-1100 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Intel

Atom E3815

The Atom E3815 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 8 October 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Bay Trail-I (2013) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 1.47 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1170. Thermal design power (TDP): 512 kB. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 365 points. Launch price was $134.

AMD

Sempron LE-1100

The Sempron LE-1100 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Sparta (2007) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 1.9 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 256 kB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: AM2. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 376 points. Launch price was $69.

Processing Power

Both the Atom E3815 and Sempron LE-1100 share an identical 1-core/1-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 1.47 GHz on the Atom E3815 versus 1.9 GHz on the Sempron LE-1100 — a 25.5% clock advantage for the Sempron LE-1100. The Atom E3815 uses the Bay Trail-I (2013) architecture (22 nm), while the Sempron LE-1100 uses Sparta (2007) (65 nm). In PassMark, the Atom E3815 scores 365 against the Sempron LE-1100's 376 — a 3% lead for the Sempron LE-1100. Both processors carry 0 kB of L3 cache.

FeatureAtom E3815Sempron LE-1100
Cores / Threads
1 / 1
1 / 1
Boost Clock
1.47 GHz
1.9 GHz+29%
L3 Cache
0 kB
0 kB
L2 Cache
512 kB (per core)+100%
256 kB
Process
22 nm-66%
65 nm
Architecture
Bay Trail-I (2013)
Sparta (2007)
PassMark
365
376+3%
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Atom E3815 uses the FCBGA1170 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Sempron LE-1100 uses AM2 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureAtom E3815Sempron LE-1100
Socket
FCBGA1170
AM2
PCIe Generation
PCIe 2.0
PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR3L-1066
Max RAM Capacity
8 GB
RAM Channels
1
ECC Support
Yes
PCIe Lanes
4
🔧

Advanced Features

The Atom E3815 includes integrated graphics (Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail)), while the Sempron LE-1100 requires a dedicated GPU.

FeatureAtom E3815Sempron LE-1100
Integrated GPU
Yes
IGPU Model
Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail)