Atom D410 vs Atom E3815

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Atom D410 vs Atom E3815 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Atom D410 vs Atom E3815: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Atom D410

2010

Why buy it

✅Draws 10W instead of 512W, a 502W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (345 vs 365).

Atom E3815

2013

Why buy it

✅+5.8% higher PassMark.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (4 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌5020% higher power demand at 512W vs 10W.

Quick Answers

So, is Atom E3815 better than Atom D410?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Atom D410 is ahead with a 0.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Atom E3815 pulls ahead with 5.8% better PassMark.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Atom E3815 is the stronger fit. You are getting 5.8% better PassMark, backed by 1 cores and 1 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Atom E3815 still makes the most sense overall. Atom E3815 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you 5.8% better PassMark.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Atom E3815 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2013 vs 2010) and more multi-core headroom with 1 cores / 1 threads instead of 1/2. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Atom D410 vs Atom E3815 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Atom D410

The Atom D410 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2010 (15 years ago). It is based on the Pineview (2009−2011) architecture. It features 1 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.66 GHz, with boost up to 1.67 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA559. Thermal design power (TDP): 10 Watt. Memory support: DDR2. Passmark benchmark score: 345 points. Launch price was $636.

Atom E3815

The Atom E3815 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 8 October 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Bay Trail-I (2013) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 1.47 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1170. Thermal design power (TDP): 512 kB. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 365 points. Launch price was $134.

⚡

Processing Power

The Atom D410 packs 1 cores / 2 threads, matching the Atom E3815's 1 cores. Boost clocks reach 1.67 GHz on the Atom D410 versus 1.47 GHz on the Atom E3815 — a 12.7% clock advantage for the Atom D410. The Atom D410 uses the Pineview (2009−2011) architecture (45 nm), while the Atom E3815 uses Bay Trail-I (2013) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Atom D410 scores 345 against the Atom E3815's 365 — a 5.6% lead for the Atom E3815. Both processors carry 0 kB of L3 cache.

Feature	Atom D410	Atom E3815
Cores / Threads	1 / 2	1 / 1
Boost Clock	1.67 GHz+14%	1.47 GHz
Base Clock	1.66 GHz	—
L3 Cache	0 kB	0 kB
L2 Cache	512 kB (per core)	512 kB (per core)
Process	45 nm	22 nm-51%
Architecture	Pineview (2009−2011)	Bay Trail-I (2013)
PassMark	345	365+6%

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Atom D410 uses the FCBGA559 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Atom E3815 uses FCBGA1170 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR2-800 on the Atom D410 versus DDR3L-1066 on the Atom E3815 — the Atom E3815 supports 33.3% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Atom E3815 supports up to 8 GB of RAM compared to 4 GB — 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 1-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 0 (Atom D410) vs 4 (Atom E3815) — the Atom E3815 offers 4 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: Intel FCBGA559 (Atom D410) and Intel FCBGA1170 (Atom E3815).

Feature	Atom D410	Atom E3815
Socket	FCBGA559	FCBGA1170
PCIe Generation	PCIe 2.0	PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR2-800	DDR3L-1066+33%
Max RAM Capacity	4 GB	8 GB+100%
RAM Channels	1	1
ECC Support	No	Yes
PCIe Lanes	0	4

🔧

Advanced Features

Both include integrated graphics — Intel GMA 3150 (Atom D410) and Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail) (Atom E3815) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU.