Atom D410
VS
Core Solo T1200

Atom D410 vs Core Solo T1200

Intel

Atom D410

1 Cores2 Thrd10 WWMax: 1.67 GHz2010
VS
Intel

Core Solo T1200

1 Cores1 Thrd2 WWMax: 1.5 GHz2006

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Atom D410 is positioned at rank 271 and the Core Solo T1200 is on rank 1241, so the Atom D410 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Atom D410

#258
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
425%
#259
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
419%
#260
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
385%
#261
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
383%
#262
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
379%
#264
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
366%
#265
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
351%
#266
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
351%
#267
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
341%
#271
Atom D410
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#276
Core 2 Extreme X9100
MSRP: $851|Avg: N/A
100%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Core Solo T1200

#1229
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
17259%
#1230
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
17006%
#1231
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
15612%
#1232
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
15541%
#1233
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
15399%
#1235
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
14871%
#1236
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
14259%
#1237
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
14235%
#1238
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
13853%
#1241
Core Solo T1200
MSRP: $209|Avg: $10
100%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Trade-off: The Atom D410 leads in gaming performance. However, the Core Solo T1200 is the stronger candidate for professional workloads, offering 2.9% greater multi-core processing power.
InsightAtom D410Core Solo T1200
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($10)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Pineview (2009−2011) / 45 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Yonah (2005−2006) / 65 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

InsightAtom D410Core Solo T1200
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($10)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Atom D410 and Core Solo T1200

Intel

Atom D410

The Atom D410 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2010 (15 years ago). It is based on the Pineview (2009−2011) architecture. It features 1 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.66 GHz, with boost up to 1.67 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA559. Thermal design power (TDP): 10 Watt. Memory support: DDR2. Passmark benchmark score: 345 points. Launch price was $636.

Intel

Core Solo T1200

The Core Solo T1200 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2008-01-01. It is based on the Yonah (2005−2006) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 1.5 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: BGA479. Thermal design power (TDP): 2 MB. Memory support: DDR1. Passmark benchmark score: 355 points. Launch price was $249.

Processing Power

The Atom D410 packs 1 cores / 2 threads, matching the Core Solo T1200's 1 cores. Boost clocks reach 1.67 GHz on the Atom D410 versus 1.5 GHz on the Core Solo T1200 — a 10.7% clock advantage for the Atom D410. The Atom D410 uses the Pineview (2009−2011) architecture (45 nm), while the Core Solo T1200 uses Yonah (2005−2006) (65 nm). In PassMark, the Atom D410 scores 345 against the Core Solo T1200's 355 — a 2.9% lead for the Core Solo T1200. Both processors carry 0 kB of L3 cache.

FeatureAtom D410Core Solo T1200
Cores / Threads
1 / 2
1 / 1
Boost Clock
1.67 GHz+11%
1.5 GHz
Base Clock
1.66 GHz
L3 Cache
0 kB
0 kB
L2 Cache
512 kB (per core)
2 MB+300%
Process
45 nm-31%
65 nm
Architecture
Pineview (2009−2011)
Yonah (2005−2006)
PassMark
345
355+3%
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Atom D410 uses the FCBGA559 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Core Solo T1200 uses BGA479 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureAtom D410Core Solo T1200
Socket
FCBGA559
BGA479
PCIe Generation
PCIe 2.0+82%
PCIe 1.1
Max RAM Speed
DDR2-800
Max RAM Capacity
4 GB
RAM Channels
1
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
0
🔧

Advanced Features

The Atom D410 includes integrated graphics (Intel GMA 3150), while the Core Solo T1200 requires a dedicated GPU.

FeatureAtom D410Core Solo T1200
Integrated GPU
Yes
IGPU Model
Intel GMA 3150