Athlon XP 2700+
VS
Atom D410

Athlon XP 2700+ vs Atom D410

AMD

Athlon XP 2700+

1 Cores1 Thrd68 WWMax: 2.17 GHz2002
VS
Intel

Atom D410

1 Cores2 Thrd10 WWMax: 1.67 GHz2010

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Athlon XP 2700+ is positioned at rank 1124 and the Atom D410 is on rank 271, so the Atom D410 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Athlon XP 2700+

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
302636%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
285961%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
207631%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
62550%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
49547%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
43344%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
24825%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
24501%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
22309%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
22307%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
22057%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
21462%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
21162%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
21077%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
20885%
#1124
Athlon XP 2700+
MSRP: $349|Avg: $20
100%
#1125
Athlon XP 2800+
MSRP: $375|Avg: $35
98%
#1126
Pentium III 1200
MSRP: $200|Avg: $10
95%
#1127
Athlon XP 3200+
MSRP: $464|Avg: $40
93%
#1128
Pentium III 1400
MSRP: $250|Avg: $20
88%
#1129
Pentium III 1400S
MSRP: $250|Avg: $250
88%
#1130
Pentium 4 2.60
MSRP: $401|Avg: $25
88%
#1131
Athlon XP 1800+
MSRP: $252|Avg: $30
86%
#1132
Athlon XP 1900+
MSRP: $269|Avg: $20
85%
#1133
Athlon 64 FX-51
MSRP: $733|Avg: $733
82%
#1134
Athlon 64 FX-55
MSRP: $827|Avg: $50
81%
#1135
Athlon 64 FX-53
MSRP: $799|Avg: $15
79%
#1136
Athlon XP 2000+
MSRP: $339|Avg: $40
72%
#1137
Athlon 64 FX-57
MSRP: $1031|Avg: $200
68%
#1138
Athlon XP 3000+
MSRP: $588|Avg: $20
67%
#1139
Athlon XP 2100+
MSRP: $420|Avg: $30
61%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Atom D410

#258
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
425%
#259
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
419%
#260
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
385%
#261
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
383%
#262
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
379%
#264
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
366%
#265
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
351%
#266
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
351%
#267
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
341%
#271
Atom D410
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#276
Core 2 Extreme X9100
MSRP: $851|Avg: N/A
100%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Generational Difference: This comparison involves processors from different technological eras. The Atom D410 (2010) utilizes 45 nm technology and DDR2, providing a fundamental performance advantage.
InsightAthlon XP 2700+Atom D410
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Better multi-core power
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price
⚠️ Higher cost ($20)
More affordable ($0)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Thoroughbred (2001−2002) / 130 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Pineview (2009−2011) / 45 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Athlon XP 2700+ (2002) relies on 130 nm technology and older memory, placing it in a different performance category relative to modern standards.
InsightAthlon XP 2700+Atom D410
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
⚠️ Higher cost ($20)
More affordable ($0)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Athlon XP 2700+ and Atom D410

AMD

Athlon XP 2700+

The Athlon XP 2700+ is manufactured by AMD. It was released in Outubro 2002 (23 years ago). It is based on the Thoroughbred (2001−2002) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 2.17 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 256 kB. Built on 130 nm process technology. Socket: A. Thermal design power (TDP): 68 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 360 points. Launch price was $85.

Intel

Atom D410

The Atom D410 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2010 (15 years ago). It is based on the Pineview (2009−2011) architecture. It features 1 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.66 GHz, with boost up to 1.67 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA559. Thermal design power (TDP): 10 Watt. Memory support: DDR2. Passmark benchmark score: 345 points. Launch price was $636.

Processing Power

The Athlon XP 2700+ packs 1 cores / 1 threads, matching the Atom D410's 1 cores. Boost clocks reach 2.17 GHz on the Athlon XP 2700+ versus 1.67 GHz on the Atom D410 — a 26% clock advantage for the Athlon XP 2700+. The Athlon XP 2700+ uses the Thoroughbred (2001−2002) architecture (130 nm), while the Atom D410 uses Pineview (2009−2011) (45 nm). In PassMark, the Athlon XP 2700+ scores 360 against the Atom D410's 345 — a 4.3% lead for the Athlon XP 2700+. Both processors carry 0 kB of L3 cache.

FeatureAthlon XP 2700+Atom D410
Cores / Threads
1 / 1
1 / 2
Boost Clock
2.17 GHz+30%
1.67 GHz
Base Clock
1.66 GHz
L3 Cache
0 kB
0 kB
L2 Cache
256 kB
512 kB (per core)+100%
Process
130 nm
45 nm-65%
Architecture
Thoroughbred (2001−2002)
Pineview (2009−2011)
PassMark
360+4%
345
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Athlon XP 2700+ uses the A socket (PCIe 1.1), while the Atom D410 uses FCBGA559 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR-333 on the Athlon XP 2700+ versus DDR2-800 on the Atom D410 — the Atom D410 supports -202.4% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 4 GB of RAM. Both feature 1-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 0 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: AMD Socket A (Athlon XP 2700+) and Intel FCBGA559 (Atom D410).

FeatureAthlon XP 2700+Atom D410
Socket
A
FCBGA559
PCIe Generation
PCIe 1.1
PCIe 2.0+82%
Max RAM Speed
DDR-333
DDR2-800
Max RAM Capacity
4 GB
4 GB
RAM Channels
1
1
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
0
0
🔧

Advanced Features

The Atom D410 includes integrated graphics (Intel GMA 3150), while the Athlon XP 2700+ requires a dedicated GPU.

FeatureAthlon XP 2700+Atom D410
Integrated GPU
No
Yes
IGPU Model
Intel GMA 3150