Athlon XP 2700+
VS
Atom Z670

Athlon XP 2700+ vs Atom Z670

AMD

Athlon XP 2700+

1 Cores1 Thrd68 WWMax: 2.17 GHz2002
VS
Intel

Atom Z670

1 Cores2 Thrd3 WWMax: 1.5 GHz2011

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Athlon XP 2700+ is positioned at rank 1124 and the Atom Z670 is on rank 1095, so the Atom Z670 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Athlon XP 2700+

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
302636%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
285961%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
207631%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
62550%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
49547%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
43344%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
24825%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
24501%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
22309%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
22307%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
22057%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
21462%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
21162%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
21077%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
20885%
#1124
Athlon XP 2700+
MSRP: $349|Avg: $20
100%
#1125
Athlon XP 2800+
MSRP: $375|Avg: $35
98%
#1126
Pentium III 1200
MSRP: $200|Avg: $10
95%
#1127
Athlon XP 3200+
MSRP: $464|Avg: $40
93%
#1128
Pentium III 1400
MSRP: $250|Avg: $20
88%
#1129
Pentium III 1400S
MSRP: $250|Avg: $250
88%
#1130
Pentium 4 2.60
MSRP: $401|Avg: $25
88%
#1131
Athlon XP 1800+
MSRP: $252|Avg: $30
86%
#1132
Athlon XP 1900+
MSRP: $269|Avg: $20
85%
#1133
Athlon 64 FX-51
MSRP: $733|Avg: $733
82%
#1134
Athlon 64 FX-55
MSRP: $827|Avg: $50
81%
#1135
Athlon 64 FX-53
MSRP: $799|Avg: $15
79%
#1136
Athlon XP 2000+
MSRP: $339|Avg: $40
72%
#1137
Athlon 64 FX-57
MSRP: $1031|Avg: $200
68%
#1138
Athlon XP 3000+
MSRP: $588|Avg: $20
67%
#1139
Athlon XP 2100+
MSRP: $420|Avg: $30
61%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Atom Z670

#1083
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
3128%
#1084
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
3082%
#1085
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
2829%
#1086
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
2817%
#1087
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
2791%
#1089
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
2695%
#1090
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
2584%
#1091
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
2580%
#1092
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
2511%
#1095
Atom Z670
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#1096
Core i7-2635QM
MSRP: $378|Avg: N/A
100%
#1097
Celeron 877
MSRP: $86|Avg: $15
100%
#1098
Celeron Dual-Core SU2300
MSRP: $134|Avg: $50
99%
#1099
Core i5-3337U
MSRP: $225|Avg: N/A
99%
#1100
Core i5-2450M
MSRP: $225|Avg: N/A
98%
#1101
Core i5-7Y57
MSRP: $281|Avg: $281
98%
#1102
Core i5-7Y54
MSRP: $281|Avg: $100
98%
#1104
Pentium 997
MSRP: $134|Avg: $10
97%
#1105
Pentium A1018
MSRP: $132|Avg: $15
96%
#1106
Core i5-2430M
MSRP: $225|Avg: N/A
96%
#1108
Pentium Dual Core T4500
MSRP: $150|Avg: $30
95%
#1109
Celeron B820
MSRP: $86|Avg: $15
95%
#1110
Pentium B980
MSRP: $125|Avg: $35
94%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Generational Difference: This comparison involves processors from different technological eras. The Atom Z670 (2011) utilizes 45 nm technology and DDR2, providing a fundamental performance advantage.
InsightAthlon XP 2700+Atom Z670
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
⚠️ Higher cost ($20)
More affordable ($0)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Thoroughbred (2001−2002) / 130 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Lincroft (2010−2011) / 45 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Athlon XP 2700+ (2002) relies on 130 nm technology and older memory, placing it in a different performance category relative to modern standards.
InsightAthlon XP 2700+Atom Z670
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
⚠️ Higher cost ($20)
More affordable ($0)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Athlon XP 2700+ and Atom Z670

AMD

Athlon XP 2700+

The Athlon XP 2700+ is manufactured by AMD. It was released in Outubro 2002 (23 years ago). It is based on the Thoroughbred (2001−2002) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 2.17 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 256 kB. Built on 130 nm process technology. Socket: A. Thermal design power (TDP): 68 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 360 points. Launch price was $85.

Intel

Atom Z670

The Atom Z670 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 11 April 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Lincroft (2010−2011) architecture. It features 1 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.5 GHz, with boost up to 1.5 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: T-PBGA518. Thermal design power (TDP): 3 Watt. Memory support: DDR2. Passmark benchmark score: 375 points. Launch price was $75.

Processing Power

The Athlon XP 2700+ packs 1 cores / 1 threads, matching the Atom Z670's 1 cores. Boost clocks reach 2.17 GHz on the Athlon XP 2700+ versus 1.5 GHz on the Atom Z670 — a 36.5% clock advantage for the Athlon XP 2700+. The Athlon XP 2700+ uses the Thoroughbred (2001−2002) architecture (130 nm), while the Atom Z670 uses Lincroft (2010−2011) (45 nm). In PassMark, the Athlon XP 2700+ scores 360 against the Atom Z670's 375 — a 4.1% lead for the Atom Z670. Both processors carry 0 kB of L3 cache.

FeatureAthlon XP 2700+Atom Z670
Cores / Threads
1 / 1
1 / 2
Boost Clock
2.17 GHz+45%
1.5 GHz
Base Clock
1.5 GHz
L3 Cache
0 kB
0 kB
L2 Cache
256 kB
512K (per core)+100%
Process
130 nm
45 nm-65%
Architecture
Thoroughbred (2001−2002)
Lincroft (2010−2011)
PassMark
360
375+4%
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Athlon XP 2700+ uses the A socket (PCIe 1.1), while the Atom Z670 uses T-PBGA518 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR-333 on the Athlon XP 2700+ versus DDR2-800 on the Atom Z670 — the Atom Z670 supports -202.4% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Athlon XP 2700+ supports up to 4 GB of RAM compared to 2 GB 66.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 1-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 0 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: AMD Socket A (Athlon XP 2700+) and Intel SM35 (Atom Z670).

FeatureAthlon XP 2700+Atom Z670
Socket
A
T-PBGA518
PCIe Generation
PCIe 1.1
PCIe 2.0+82%
Max RAM Speed
DDR-333
DDR2-800
Max RAM Capacity
4 GB+100%
2 GB
RAM Channels
1
1
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
0
0
🔧

Advanced Features

The Atom Z670 includes integrated graphics (Intel GMA 600), while the Athlon XP 2700+ requires a dedicated GPU.

FeatureAthlon XP 2700+Atom Z670
Integrated GPU
No
Yes
IGPU Model
Intel GMA 600