Athlon XP 2700+ vs Atom Z670

Athlon XP 2700+ vs Atom Z670 Performance Spectrum

Athlon XP 2700+

1 / 1

360

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Atom Z670

1 / 2

375

+4.2%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Athlon XP 2700+ vs Atom Z670 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Athlon XP 2700+ vs Atom Z670: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Athlon XP 2700+

2002

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (360 vs 375).
❌Launch MSRP is still $349 MSRP, while Atom Z670 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌2166.7% higher power demand at 68W vs 3W.
❌No integrated graphics, while Atom Z670 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Atom Z670

2011

Why buy it

✅+4.2% higher PassMark.
✅Draws 3W instead of 68W, a 65W reduction.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel GMA 600, while Athlon XP 2700+ needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.

Quick Answers

So, is Atom Z670 better than Athlon XP 2700+?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Athlon XP 2700+ is ahead with 44.7% higher max boost clock. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Atom Z670 pulls ahead with 4.2% better PassMark.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Atom Z670 is the stronger fit. You are getting 4.2% better PassMark, backed by 1 cores and 2 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Atom Z670 is still the much better call for a fresh build. Atom Z670 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $349 MSRP, and it still gives you 4.2% better PassMark. Athlon XP 2700+ only looks stronger on raw value math because it is extremely cheap, but that usually means used-market pricing on an obsolete 2002 platform. Even with 100.0% better value on paper (1.0 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), it really only makes sense as a cheap stopgap or a niche existing-platform option for someone already on A.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Atom Z670 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2011 vs 2002) and more multi-core headroom with 1 cores / 2 threads instead of 1/1. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Athlon XP 2700+ vs Atom Z670 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Athlon XP 2700+

The Athlon XP 2700+ is manufactured by AMD. It was released in Outubro 2002 (23 years ago). It is based on the Thoroughbred (2001−2002) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 2.17 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 256 kB. Built on 130 nm process technology. Socket: A. Thermal design power (TDP): 68 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 360 points. Launch price was $85.

Atom Z670

The Atom Z670 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 11 April 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Lincroft (2010−2011) architecture. It features 1 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.5 GHz, with boost up to 1.5 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: T-PBGA518. Thermal design power (TDP): 3 Watt. Memory support: DDR2. Passmark benchmark score: 375 points. Launch price was $75.

⚡

Processing Power

The Athlon XP 2700+ packs 1 cores / 1 threads, matching the Atom Z670's 1 cores. Boost clocks reach 2.17 GHz on the Athlon XP 2700+ versus 1.5 GHz on the Atom Z670 — a 36.5% clock advantage for the Athlon XP 2700+. The Athlon XP 2700+ uses the Thoroughbred (2001−2002) architecture (130 nm), while the Atom Z670 uses Lincroft (2010−2011) (45 nm). In PassMark, the Athlon XP 2700+ scores 360 against the Atom Z670's 375 — a 4.1% lead for the Atom Z670. Both processors carry 0 kB of L3 cache.

Feature	Athlon XP 2700+	Atom Z670
Cores / Threads	1 / 1	1 / 2
Boost Clock	2.17 GHz+45%	1.5 GHz
Base Clock	—	1.5 GHz
L3 Cache	0 kB	0 kB
L2 Cache	256 kB	512K (per core)+100%
Process	130 nm	45 nm-65%
Architecture	Thoroughbred (2001−2002)	Lincroft (2010−2011)
PassMark	360	375+4%

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Athlon XP 2700+ uses the A socket (PCIe 1.1), while the Atom Z670 uses T-PBGA518 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR-333 on the Athlon XP 2700+ versus DDR2-800 on the Atom Z670 — the Atom Z670 supports -340.2% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Athlon XP 2700+ supports up to 4 GB of RAM compared to 2 GB — 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 1-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 0 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: AMD Socket A (Athlon XP 2700+) and Intel SM35 (Atom Z670).

Feature	Athlon XP 2700+	Atom Z670
Socket	A	T-PBGA518
PCIe Generation	PCIe 1.1	PCIe 2.0+82%
Max RAM Speed	DDR-333	DDR2-800
Max RAM Capacity	4 GB+100%	2 GB
RAM Channels	1	1
ECC Support	Yes	No
PCIe Lanes	0	0