Athlon XP 2700+ vs Sempron 3100+
Athlon XP 2700+
Sempron 3100+
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Athlon XP 2700+ is positioned at rank 1124 and the Sempron 3100+ is on rank 1068, so the Sempron 3100+ offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Athlon XP 2700+
Performance Per Dollar Sempron 3100+
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Athlon XP 2700+ | Sempron 3100+ |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ✅ Superior gaming performance | ❌ Lower gaming performance |
| Workstation | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks | ✅ Better multi-core power |
| Price | ⚠️ Higher cost ($20) | ✅ More affordable ($15) |
| Longevity | 🛑 Legacy (Thoroughbred (2001−2002) / 130 nm) | 🛑 Legacy (Palermo (2001−2005) / 130 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Athlon XP 2700+ | Sempron 3100+ |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+38%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️ Higher cost ($20) | ✅ More affordable ($15) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Athlon XP 2700+ and Sempron 3100+
Athlon XP 2700+
The Athlon XP 2700+ is manufactured by AMD. It was released in Outubro 2002 (23 years ago). It is based on the Thoroughbred (2001−2002) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 2.17 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 256 kB. Built on 130 nm process technology. Socket: A. Thermal design power (TDP): 68 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 360 points. Launch price was $85.
Sempron 3100+
The Sempron 3100+ is manufactured by AMD. It was released in Janeiro 2001 (24 years ago). It is based on the Palermo (2001−2005) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 1.8 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 256 kB. Built on 130 nm process technology. Socket: 754. Thermal design power (TDP): 62 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 372 points. Launch price was $60.
Processing Power
Both the Athlon XP 2700+ and Sempron 3100+ share an identical 1-core/1-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2.17 GHz on the Athlon XP 2700+ versus 1.8 GHz on the Sempron 3100+ — a 18.6% clock advantage for the Athlon XP 2700+. The Athlon XP 2700+ uses the Thoroughbred (2001−2002) architecture (130 nm), while the Sempron 3100+ uses Palermo (2001−2005) (130 nm). In PassMark, the Athlon XP 2700+ scores 360 against the Sempron 3100+'s 372 — a 3.3% lead for the Sempron 3100+. Both processors carry 0 kB of L3 cache.
| Feature | Athlon XP 2700+ | Sempron 3100+ |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 1 / 1 | 1 / 1 |
| Boost Clock | 2.17 GHz+21% | 1.8 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 0 kB | 0 kB |
| L2 Cache | 256 kB | 256 kB |
| Process | 130 nm | 130 nm |
| Architecture | Thoroughbred (2001−2002) | Palermo (2001−2005) |
| PassMark | 360 | 372+3% |
Memory & Platform
The Athlon XP 2700+ uses the A socket (PCIe 1.1), while the Sempron 3100+ uses 754 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR-333 on the Athlon XP 2700+ versus DDR 400 MHz on the Sempron 3100+ — the Sempron 3100+ supports 2188.1% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Athlon XP 2700+ supports up to 4 GB of RAM compared to 3 GB — 28.6% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 1-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 0 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: AMD Socket A (Athlon XP 2700+) and nForce3,VIA K8T800 (Sempron 3100+).
| Feature | Athlon XP 2700+ | Sempron 3100+ |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | A | 754 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 1.1 | PCIe 2.0+82% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR-333 | DDR 400 MHz |
| Max RAM Capacity | 4 GB+33% | 3 GB |
| RAM Channels | 1 | 1 |
| ECC Support | ✅ | ❌ |
| PCIe Lanes | 0 | 0 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: not specified (Athlon XP 2700+) / false (Sempron 3100+). Primary use case: Sempron 3100+ targets Budget.
| Feature | Athlon XP 2700+ | Sempron 3100+ |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| Unlocked | — | No |
| AVX-512 | — | No |
| Virtualization | — | false |
| Target Use | — | Budget |
Value Analysis
The Athlon XP 2700+ launched at $349 MSRP, while the Sempron 3100+ debuted at $65. At current prices ($20 vs $15), the Sempron 3100+ is $5 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Athlon XP 2700+ delivers 18.0 pts/$ vs 24.8 pts/$ for the Sempron 3100+ — making the Sempron 3100+ the 31.8% better value option.
| Feature | Athlon XP 2700+ | Sempron 3100+ |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $349 | $65-81% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $20 | $15-25% |
| Performance per Dollar | 18.0 | 24.8+38% |
| Release Date | 2002 | 2001 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Athlon XP 2700+ and Sempron 3100+
