Athlon XP 2700+ vs Celeron 2.40

Athlon XP 2700+ vs Celeron 2.40 Performance Spectrum

Athlon XP 2700+

1 / 1

360

+4.3%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Celeron 2.40

1 / 1

345

0.0%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Athlon XP 2700+ vs Celeron 2.40 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Athlon XP 2700+ vs Celeron 2.40: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Athlon XP 2700+

2002

Why buy it

✅+4.3% higher PassMark.
✅Draws 68W instead of 73W, a 5W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 1.0 vs 5.0 PassMark/$ ($349 MSRP vs $69 MSRP).
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Celeron 2.40.

Celeron 2.40

2003

Why buy it

✅Costs $280 less on MSRP ($69 MSRP vs $349 MSRP).
✅Delivers 384.7% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 5.0 vs 1.0 PassMark/$ ($69 MSRP vs $349 MSRP).
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Stock Cooler), unlike Athlon XP 2700+.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (345 vs 360).

Quick Answers

So, is Celeron 2.40 better than Athlon XP 2700+?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Celeron 2.40 is ahead with 10.6% higher max boost clock. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Athlon XP 2700+ pulls ahead with 4.3% better PassMark.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Athlon XP 2700+ is the stronger fit. You are getting 4.3% better PassMark, backed by 1 cores and 1 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Celeron 2.40 is the better buy right now. Celeron 2.40 comes in $280 cheaper on MSRP at $69 MSRP versus $349 MSRP, and it still gives you 10.6% higher max boost clock. The compromise is that Athlon XP 2700+ is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 4.3% better PassMark. It is also 384.7% better value on MSRP (5.0 vs 1.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Celeron 2.40 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2003 vs 2002). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Athlon XP 2700+ vs Celeron 2.40 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Athlon XP 2700+

The Athlon XP 2700+ is manufactured by AMD. It was released in Outubro 2002 (23 years ago). It is based on the Thoroughbred (2001−2002) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 2.17 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 256 kB. Built on 130 nm process technology. Socket: A. Thermal design power (TDP): 68 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 360 points. Launch price was $85.

Celeron 2.40

The Celeron 2.40 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the NetBurst (2000−2006) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 2.4 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 128 kB. Built on 130 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 73 Watt. Memory support: DDR1, DDR2. Passmark benchmark score: 345 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Athlon XP 2700+ and Celeron 2.40 share an identical 1-core/1-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2.17 GHz on the Athlon XP 2700+ versus 2.4 GHz on the Celeron 2.40 — a 10.1% clock advantage for the Celeron 2.40. The Athlon XP 2700+ uses the Thoroughbred (2001−2002) architecture (130 nm), while the Celeron 2.40 uses NetBurst (2000−2006) (130 nm). In PassMark, the Athlon XP 2700+ scores 360 against the Celeron 2.40's 345 — a 4.3% lead for the Athlon XP 2700+. Both processors carry 0 kB of L3 cache.

Feature	Athlon XP 2700+	Celeron 2.40
Cores / Threads	1 / 1	1 / 1
Boost Clock	2.17 GHz	2.4 GHz+11%
L3 Cache	0 kB	0 kB
L2 Cache	256 kB+100%	128 kB
Process	130 nm	130 nm
Architecture	Thoroughbred (2001−2002)	NetBurst (2000−2006)
PassMark	360+4%	345
Geekbench 6 Single	—	150
Geekbench 6 Multi	—	150

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Athlon XP 2700+ uses the A socket (PCIe 1.1), while the Celeron 2.40 uses PGA478 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR-333 on the Athlon XP 2700+ versus DDR1-333 on the Celeron 2.40 — the Celeron 2.40 supports -200% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Athlon XP 2700+ supports up to 4 GB of RAM compared to 2 GB — 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 1-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 0 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: AMD Socket A (Athlon XP 2700+) and Intel 845,Intel 865 (Celeron 2.40).

Feature	Athlon XP 2700+	Celeron 2.40
Socket	A	PGA478
PCIe Generation	PCIe 1.1	PCIe 1.1
Max RAM Speed	DDR-333	DDR1-333
Max RAM Capacity	4 GB+100%	2 GB
RAM Channels	1	1
ECC Support	Yes	No
PCIe Lanes	0	0

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Athlon XP 2700+) / None (Celeron 2.40). Primary use case: Celeron 2.40 targets Legacy Desktop. Direct competitor: Celeron 2.40 rivals Pentium 4 2.40.

Feature	Athlon XP 2700+	Celeron 2.40
Integrated GPU	No	No
IGPU Model	—	None
Unlocked	—	No
AVX-512	—	No
Virtualization	—	None
Target Use	—	Legacy Desktop

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Athlon XP 2700+ was priced at $349, while the Celeron 2.40 came in at $69. On launch pricing ($349 vs $69), Celeron 2.40 was $280 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Athlon XP 2700+ delivers 1.0 pts/$ vs 5.0 pts/$ for the Celeron 2.40 — making the Celeron 2.40 the 131.6% better value option.

Feature	Athlon XP 2700+	Celeron 2.40
MSRP	$349	$69-80%
Performance per Dollar	1.0	5.0+400%
Release Date	2002	2003

Search Athlon XP 2700+ on Amazon

Search Celeron 2.40 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.