Athlon XP 2700+ vs Mobile Pentium 4 2.40

Athlon XP 2700+ vs Mobile Pentium 4 2.40 Performance Spectrum

Athlon XP 2700+

1 / 1

360

+4.3%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Mobile Pentium 4 2.40

1 / 2

345

0.0%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Athlon XP 2700+ vs Mobile Pentium 4 2.40 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Athlon XP 2700+ vs Mobile Pentium 4 2.40: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Athlon XP 2700+

2002

Why buy it

✅+4.3% higher PassMark.

Trade-offs

❌Launch MSRP is still $349 MSRP, while Mobile Pentium 4 2.40 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

Mobile Pentium 4 2.40

2003

Why buy it

✅Draws 60W instead of 68W, a 8W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (345 vs 360).

Quick Answers

So, is Mobile Pentium 4 2.40 better than Athlon XP 2700+?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Mobile Pentium 4 2.40 is ahead with 10.6% higher max boost clock. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Athlon XP 2700+ pulls ahead with 4.3% better PassMark.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Athlon XP 2700+ is the stronger fit. You are getting 4.3% better PassMark, backed by 1 cores and 1 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Mobile Pentium 4 2.40 is still the much better call for a fresh build. Mobile Pentium 4 2.40 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $349 MSRP, and it still gives you 10.6% higher max boost clock. Athlon XP 2700+ only looks stronger on raw value math because it is extremely cheap, but that usually means used-market pricing on an obsolete 2002 platform. Even with 100.0% better value on paper (1.0 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), it really only makes sense as a cheap stopgap or a niche existing-platform option for someone already on A.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Mobile Pentium 4 2.40 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2003 vs 2002). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Athlon XP 2700+ vs Mobile Pentium 4 2.40 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Athlon XP 2700+

The Athlon XP 2700+ is manufactured by AMD. It was released in Outubro 2002 (23 years ago). It is based on the Thoroughbred (2001−2002) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 2.17 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 256 kB. Built on 130 nm process technology. Socket: A. Thermal design power (TDP): 68 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 360 points. Launch price was $85.

Mobile Pentium 4 2.40

The Mobile Pentium 4 2.40 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in Junho 2003 (22 years ago). It is based on the Northwood (2002−2004) architecture. It features 1 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 2.4 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 130 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 60 Watt. Memory support: DDR1, DDR2. Passmark benchmark score: 345 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

The Athlon XP 2700+ packs 1 cores / 1 threads, matching the Mobile Pentium 4 2.40's 1 cores. Boost clocks reach 2.17 GHz on the Athlon XP 2700+ versus 2.4 GHz on the Mobile Pentium 4 2.40 — a 10.1% clock advantage for the Mobile Pentium 4 2.40. The Athlon XP 2700+ uses the Thoroughbred (2001−2002) architecture (130 nm), while the Mobile Pentium 4 2.40 uses Northwood (2002−2004) (130 nm). In PassMark, the Athlon XP 2700+ scores 360 against the Mobile Pentium 4 2.40's 345 — a 4.3% lead for the Athlon XP 2700+. Both processors carry 0 kB of L3 cache.

Feature	Athlon XP 2700+	Mobile Pentium 4 2.40
Cores / Threads	1 / 1	1 / 2
Boost Clock	2.17 GHz	2.4 GHz+11%
L3 Cache	0 kB	0 kB
L2 Cache	256 kB	512 kB+100%
Process	130 nm	130 nm
Architecture	Thoroughbred (2001−2002)	Northwood (2002−2004)
PassMark	360+4%	345

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Athlon XP 2700+ uses the A socket (PCIe 1.1), while the Mobile Pentium 4 2.40 uses PGA478 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.