Atom E3827 vs Core 2 Duo L7200

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Atom E3827 vs Core 2 Duo L7200 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Atom E3827 vs Core 2 Duo L7200: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Atom E3827

2013

Why buy it

✅Draws 8W instead of 17W, a 9W reduction.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (4 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail), while Core 2 Duo L7200 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (665 vs 685).

Core 2 Duo L7200

2007

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌112.5% higher power demand at 17W vs 8W.
❌No integrated graphics, while Atom E3827 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Core 2 Duo L7200 better than Atom E3827?

Yes. Core 2 Duo L7200 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you 3% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Core 2 Duo L7200 has the edge because it leads the single-thread side of this matchup with 3% stronger overall PassMark.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core 2 Duo L7200 is the stronger fit. You are getting 3% better PassMark.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core 2 Duo L7200 still makes the most sense overall. Core 2 Duo L7200 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you 3.0% higher PassMark.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Atom E3827 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2013 vs 2007). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Atom E3827 vs Core 2 Duo L7200 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Atom E3827

The Atom E3827 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 8 October 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Bay Trail-I (2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 1.75 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1170. Thermal design power (TDP): 8 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 665 points. Launch price was $69.

Core 2 Duo L7200

The Core 2 Duo L7200 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2008-01-01. It has 2 cores. Base frequency: 1.33 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB L2 Cache. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: BGA479. Thermal design power (TDP): 17 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 685 points. Launch price was $249.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Atom E3827 and Core 2 Duo L7200 share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. The Atom E3827 is built on the Bay Trail-I (2013) architecture. In PassMark, the Atom E3827 scores 665 against the Core 2 Duo L7200's 685 — a 3% lead for the Core 2 Duo L7200. L3 cache: 0 kB on the Atom E3827 vs 4 MB L2 Cache on the Core 2 Duo L7200.

Feature	Atom E3827	Core 2 Duo L7200
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	2
Boost Clock	1.75 GHz	—
Base Clock	—	1.33 GHz
L3 Cache	0 kB	4 MB L2 Cache
L2 Cache	512 kB (per core)	—
Process	22 nm-66%	65 nm
Architecture	Bay Trail-I (2013)	—
PassMark	665	685+3%

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Atom E3827 uses the FCBGA1170 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Core 2 Duo L7200 uses BGA479 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Atom E3827	Core 2 Duo L7200
Socket	FCBGA1170	BGA479
PCIe Generation	PCIe 2.0+82%	PCIe 1.1
Max RAM Speed	DDR3L-1333	—
Max RAM Capacity	8 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	Yes	—
PCIe Lanes	4	—