Atom E3827 vs Core 2 Duo T5200

Intel

Atom E3827

2 Cores2 Thrd8 WWMax: 1.75 GHz2013
Similar parts
·······
VS
Intel

Core 2 Duo T5200

2 Cores2 Thrd2 WWMax: 1.66 GHz2006
Similar parts
·······

Atom E3827 vs Core 2 Duo T5200 Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Atom E3827 vs Core 2 Duo T5200 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Atom E3827 vs Core 2 Duo T5200: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Atom E3827

2013

Why buy it

  • 100+% more PCIe lanes (4 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
  • Integrated graphics onboard with Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail), while Core 2 Duo T5200 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

  • Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core 2 Duo T5200 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • Lower PassMark (665 vs 705).
  • 300% higher power demand at 8W vs 2W.

Core 2 Duo T5200

2006

Why buy it

  • Better for gaming: +5.9% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • Draws 2W instead of 8W, a 6W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • No integrated graphics, while Atom E3827 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Core 2 Duo T5200 better than Atom E3827?
Yes. Core 2 Duo T5200 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 5.9% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 6% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.
Which one is better for gaming?
If gaming is the priority, Core 2 Duo T5200 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 5.9% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core 2 Duo T5200 is the stronger fit. You are getting 6% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Core 2 Duo T5200 still makes the most sense overall. Core 2 Duo T5200 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 5.9% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Atom E3827 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2013 vs 2006). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Atom E3827 vs Core 2 Duo T5200 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Intel

Atom E3827

The Atom E3827 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 8 October 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Bay Trail-I (2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 1.75 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1170. Thermal design power (TDP): 8 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 665 points. Launch price was $69.

Intel

Core 2 Duo T5200

The Core 2 Duo T5200 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2008-01-01. It is based on the Merom (2006−2008) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.6 GHz, with boost up to 1.66 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: BGA479. Thermal design power (TDP): 34 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 705 points. Launch price was $249.

Processing Power

Both the Atom E3827 and Core 2 Duo T5200 share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 1.75 GHz on the Atom E3827 versus 1.66 GHz on the Core 2 Duo T5200 — a 5.3% clock advantage for the Atom E3827. The Atom E3827 uses the Bay Trail-I (2013) architecture (22 nm), while the Core 2 Duo T5200 uses Merom (2006−2008) (65 nm). In PassMark, the Atom E3827 scores 665 against the Core 2 Duo T5200's 705 — a 5.8% lead for the Core 2 Duo T5200. Both processors carry 0 kB of L3 cache.

FeatureAtom E3827Core 2 Duo T5200
Cores / Threads
2 / 2
2 / 2
Boost Clock
1.75 GHz+5%
1.66 GHz
Base Clock
1.6 GHz
L3 Cache
0 kB
0 kB
L2 Cache
512 kB (per core)
2 MB+300%
Process
22 nm-66%
65 nm
Architecture
Bay Trail-I (2013)
Merom (2006−2008)
PassMark
665
705+6%
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Atom E3827 uses the FCBGA1170 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Core 2 Duo T5200 uses BGA479 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureAtom E3827Core 2 Duo T5200
Socket
FCBGA1170
BGA479
PCIe Generation
PCIe 2.0+82%
PCIe 1.1
Max RAM Speed
DDR3L-1333
Max RAM Capacity
8 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
Yes
PCIe Lanes
4
🔧

Advanced Features

The Atom E3827 includes integrated graphics (Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail)), while the Core 2 Duo T5200 requires a dedicated GPU.

FeatureAtom E3827Core 2 Duo T5200
Integrated GPU
Yes
IGPU Model
Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail)