Atom E3827 vs Pentium T2310

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Atom E3827 vs Pentium T2310 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Atom E3827 vs Pentium T2310: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Atom E3827

2013

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +6.2% higher average FPS across 49 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Draws 8W instead of 35W, a 27W reduction.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (4 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail), while Pentium T2310 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.

Pentium T2310

2007

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Atom E3827 across 49 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (625 vs 665).
❌Launch MSRP is still $150 MSRP, while Atom E3827 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌337.5% higher power demand at 35W vs 8W.
❌No integrated graphics, while Atom E3827 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Atom E3827 better than Pentium T2310?

Yes. Atom E3827 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 6.2% average FPS lead across 49 shared CPU game tests in our data, 6.4% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Atom E3827 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 6.2% more average FPS across 49 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Atom E3827 is the stronger fit. You are getting 6.4% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Atom E3827 is still the much better call for a fresh build. Atom E3827 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $150 MSRP, and it still gives you a 6.2% average FPS lead across 49 shared CPU game tests in our data. Pentium T2310 only looks stronger on raw value math because it is extremely cheap, but that usually means used-market pricing on an obsolete 2007 platform. Even with 100.0% better value on paper (4.2 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), it really only makes sense as a cheap stopgap or a niche existing-platform option for someone already on PGA478.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Atom E3827 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2013 vs 2007). That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Atom E3827 vs Pentium T2310 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Atom E3827

The Atom E3827 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 8 October 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Bay Trail-I (2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 1.75 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1170. Thermal design power (TDP): 8 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 665 points. Launch price was $69.

Pentium T2310

The Pentium T2310 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. Base frequency: 1.46 GHz. L3 cache: 1 MB L2 Cache. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 625 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

The Atom E3827 is built on the Bay Trail-I (2013) architecture. In PassMark, the Atom E3827 scores 665 against the Pentium T2310's 625 — a 6.2% lead for the Atom E3827. L3 cache: 0 kB on the Atom E3827 vs 1 MB L2 Cache on the Pentium T2310.

Feature	Atom E3827	Pentium T2310
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	—
Boost Clock	1.75 GHz	—
Base Clock	—	1.46 GHz
L3 Cache	0 kB	1 MB L2 Cache
L2 Cache	512 kB (per core)	—
Process	22 nm-66%	65 nm
Architecture	Bay Trail-I (2013)	—
PassMark	665+6%	625

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Atom E3827 uses the FCBGA1170 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Pentium T2310 uses PGA478 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3L-1333 on the Atom E3827 versus DDR2-667 on the Pentium T2310 — the Atom E3827 supports 99.9% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Atom E3827 supports up to 8 GB of RAM compared to 4 GB — 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 4 (Atom E3827) vs 0 (Pentium T2310) — the Atom E3827 offers 4 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives.

Feature	Atom E3827	Pentium T2310
Socket	FCBGA1170	PGA478
PCIe Generation	PCIe 2.0+82%	PCIe 1.1
Max RAM Speed	DDR3L-1333+100%	DDR2-667
Max RAM Capacity	8 GB+100%	4 GB
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	Yes	No
PCIe Lanes	4	0

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Atom E3827) / VT-x is missing (Pentium T2310). The Atom E3827 includes integrated graphics (Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail)), while the Pentium T2310 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Pentium T2310 targets Mobile.