Atom E3827
VS
Ryzen 5 5600

Atom E3827 vs Ryzen 5 5600

Intel

Atom E3827

2 Cores2 Thrd8 WWMax: 1.75 GHz2013
VS
AMD

Ryzen 5 5600

6 Cores12 Thrd65 WWMax: 4.4 GHz2022

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. The Atom E3827 is positioned at rank #953 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Atom E3827

#941
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
1809%
#942
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
1782%
#943
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
1636%
#944
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
1629%
#945
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
1614%
#947
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
1559%
#948
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
1494%
#949
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
1492%
#950
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
1452%
#953
Atom E3827
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#954
Core i7-5850EQ
MSRP: $435|Avg: $370
100%
#956
Core i7-4810MQ
MSRP: $378|Avg: $378
99%
#959
Celeron Dual-Core T3500
MSRP: $80|Avg: $15
98%
#960
Celeron 4305UE
MSRP: $107|Avg: $107
98%
#963
Core i7-10510U
MSRP: $409|Avg: N/A
97%
#968
Core i7-4710MQ
MSRP: $378|Avg: $378
94%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Ryzen 5 5600

#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
135%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
123%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
123%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
121%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
118%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
116%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
116%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
115%
#16
Core Ultra 5 225F
MSRP: $231|Avg: $150
112%
#17
Core Ultra 7 265K
MSRP: $309|Avg: $285
110%
#18
Ryzen 9 3900
MSRP: $499|Avg: $150
109%
#19
Ryzen 5 3600X
MSRP: $249|Avg: $90
108%
#20
Core i7-14700KF
MSRP: $384|Avg: $260
107%
#21
Core i7-14700K
MSRP: $409|Avg: $270
103%
#22
Ryzen 5 4500
MSRP: $129|Avg: $85
101%
#23
Ryzen 5 5600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $115
100%
#24
Celeron G5925
MSRP: $62|Avg: $15
100%
#25
Ryzen 5 7500F
MSRP: $179|Avg: $145
98%
#26
Core Ultra 5 245
MSRP: $319|Avg: $220
97%
#27
Ryzen 7 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $86
97%
#28
Core Ultra 7 265KF
MSRP: $379|Avg: $323
97%
#29
Core Ultra 7 265F
MSRP: $369|Avg: $276
95%
#30
Core i5-12400F
MSRP: $174|Avg: $110
95%
#31
Ryzen 3 PRO 5355G
MSRP: $130|Avg: $80
94%
#32
Ryzen 7 2700X
MSRP: $329|Avg: $100
93%
#33
Core i3-10100F
MSRP: $88|Avg: $50
93%
#34
Ryzen 5 7400F
MSRP: $150|Avg: $147
93%
#35
Ryzen 5 9600X
MSRP: $279|Avg: $178
90%
#36
Ryzen 7 3800X
MSRP: $399|Avg: $140
88%
#37
Ryzen 3 5300G
MSRP: $130|Avg: $80
87%
#38
Ryzen 9 7900X
MSRP: $549|Avg: $316
87%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Generational Difference: This comparison involves processors from different technological eras. The Ryzen 5 5600 (2022) utilizes 7 nm technology and DDR4-3200, providing a fundamental performance advantage.
InsightAtom E3827Ryzen 5 5600
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($115)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Bay Trail-I (2013) / 22 nm)
✨ Modern (Vermeer (2020−2025) / 7 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Atom E3827 (2013) relies on 22 nm technology and DDR3, placing it in a different performance category relative to modern standards.
InsightAtom E3827Ryzen 5 5600
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($115)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Atom E3827 and Ryzen 5 5600

Intel

Atom E3827

The Atom E3827 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 8 October 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Bay Trail-I (2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 1.75 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1170. Thermal design power (TDP): 8 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 665 points. Launch price was $69.

AMD

Ryzen 5 5600

The Ryzen 5 5600 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 20 April 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Vermeer (2020−2025) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 21,550 points. Launch price was $299.

Processing Power

The Atom E3827 packs 2 cores / 2 threads, while the Ryzen 5 5600 offers 6 cores / 12 threads — the Ryzen 5 5600 has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 1.75 GHz on the Atom E3827 versus 4.4 GHz on the Ryzen 5 5600 — a 86.2% clock advantage for the Ryzen 5 5600. The Atom E3827 uses the Bay Trail-I (2013) architecture (22 nm), while the Ryzen 5 5600 uses Vermeer (2020−2025) (7 nm). In PassMark, the Atom E3827 scores 665 against the Ryzen 5 5600's 21,550 — a 188% lead for the Ryzen 5 5600. L3 cache: 0 kB on the Atom E3827 vs 32 MB (total) on the Ryzen 5 5600.

FeatureAtom E3827Ryzen 5 5600
Cores / Threads
2 / 2
6 / 12+200%
Boost Clock
1.75 GHz
4.4 GHz+151%
Base Clock
3.5 GHz
L3 Cache
0 kB
32 MB (total)
L2 Cache
512 kB (per core)
512K (per core)
Process
22 nm
7 nm-68%
Architecture
Bay Trail-I (2013)
Vermeer (2020−2025)
PassMark
665
21,550+3141%
Cinebench R23 Multi
11,077
Geekbench 6 Single
2,052
Geekbench 6 Multi
8,600
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Atom E3827 uses the FCBGA1170 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Ryzen 5 5600 uses AM4 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3L-1333 on the Atom E3827 versus DDR4-3200 on the Ryzen 5 5600 — the Ryzen 5 5600 supports 28.6% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Ryzen 5 5600 supports up to 128 GB of RAM compared to 8 GB 176.5% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 4 (Atom E3827) vs 24 (Ryzen 5 5600) — the Ryzen 5 5600 offers 20 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: Intel FCBGA1170 (Atom E3827) and B550,X570,B450,X470,A520 (Ryzen 5 5600).

FeatureAtom E3827Ryzen 5 5600
Socket
FCBGA1170
AM4
PCIe Generation
PCIe 2.0
PCIe 4.0+100%
Max RAM Speed
DDR3L-1333
DDR4-3200+33%
Max RAM Capacity
8 GB
128 GB+1500%
RAM Channels
2
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
4
24+500%
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Atom E3827) / AMD-V (Ryzen 5 5600). The Atom E3827 includes integrated graphics (Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail)), while the Ryzen 5 5600 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Ryzen 5 5600 targets Desktop.

FeatureAtom E3827Ryzen 5 5600
Integrated GPU
Yes
No
IGPU Model
Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail)
Unlocked
Yes
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
AMD-V
Target Use
Desktop