Atom E3845
VS
Pentium 3556U

Atom E3845 vs Pentium 3556U

Intel

Atom E3845

4 Cores4 Thrd10 WWMax: 1.91 GHz2013
VS
Intel

Pentium 3556U

2 Cores2 Thrd512 WWMax: 1.7 GHz2013

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Atom E3845 is positioned at rank 764 and the Pentium 3556U is on rank 253, so the Pentium 3556U offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Atom E3845

#752
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
1096%
#753
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
1080%
#754
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
991%
#755
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
987%
#756
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
978%
#758
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
944%
#759
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
905%
#760
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
904%
#761
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
879%
#764
Atom E3845
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#767
Core i7-1250U
MSRP: $426|Avg: N/A
99%
#773
Core i7-9750HF
MSRP: $395|Avg: $395
98%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Pentium 3556U

#241
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
411%
#242
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
405%
#243
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
371%
#244
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
370%
#245
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
366%
#247
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
354%
#248
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
339%
#249
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
339%
#250
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
330%
#253
Pentium 3556U
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Trade-off: The Atom E3845 leads in gaming performance. However, the Pentium 3556U is the stronger candidate for professional workloads, offering 0.1% greater multi-core processing power.
InsightAtom E3845Pentium 3556U
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Bay Trail-I (2013) / 22 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Haswell (2013−2015) / 22 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

InsightAtom E3845Pentium 3556U
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Atom E3845 and Pentium 3556U

Intel

Atom E3845

The Atom E3845 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 8 October 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Bay Trail-I (2013) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Max frequency: 1.91 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1170. Thermal design power (TDP): 10 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,071 points. Launch price was $69.

Intel

Pentium 3556U

The Pentium 3556U is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.7 GHz, with boost up to 1.7 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1168. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,072 points. Launch price was $69.

Processing Power

The Atom E3845 packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Pentium 3556U offers 2 cores / 2 threads — the Atom E3845 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 1.91 GHz on the Atom E3845 versus 1.7 GHz on the Pentium 3556U — a 11.6% clock advantage for the Atom E3845. The Atom E3845 uses the Bay Trail-I (2013) architecture (22 nm), while the Pentium 3556U uses Haswell (2013−2015) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Atom E3845 scores 1,071 against the Pentium 3556U's 1,072 — a 0.1% lead for the Pentium 3556U. L3 cache: 0 kB on the Atom E3845 vs 2 MB (total) on the Pentium 3556U.

FeatureAtom E3845Pentium 3556U
Cores / Threads
4 / 4+100%
2 / 2
Boost Clock
1.91 GHz+12%
1.7 GHz
Base Clock
1.7 GHz
L3 Cache
0 kB
2 MB (total)
L2 Cache
512 kB (per core)+100%
256K (per core)
Process
22 nm
22 nm
Architecture
Bay Trail-I (2013)
Haswell (2013−2015)
PassMark
1,071
1,072
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Atom E3845 uses the FCBGA1170 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Pentium 3556U uses FCBGA1168 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureAtom E3845Pentium 3556U
Socket
FCBGA1170
FCBGA1168
PCIe Generation
PCIe 2.0
PCIe 3.0+50%
Max RAM Speed
DDR3L-1333
Max RAM Capacity
8 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
4
🔧

Advanced Features

The Atom E3845 includes integrated graphics (Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail)), while the Pentium 3556U requires a dedicated GPU.

FeatureAtom E3845Pentium 3556U
Integrated GPU
Yes
IGPU Model
Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail)