Atom E3845 vs Phenom X3 8250e

Atom E3845 vs Phenom X3 8250e Performance Spectrum

Atom E3845

4 / 4

1,071

0.0%

1,084

+1.2%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Atom E3845 vs Phenom X3 8250e FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Atom E3845 vs Phenom X3 8250e: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Atom E3845

2013

Why buy it

✅Draws 10W instead of 65W, a 55W reduction.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (4 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail), while Phenom X3 8250e needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,071 vs 1,084).

Phenom X3 8250e

2008

Why buy it

✅+1.2% higher PassMark.

Trade-offs

❌550% higher power demand at 65W vs 10W.
❌No integrated graphics, while Atom E3845 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Atom E3845 better than Phenom X3 8250e?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Atom E3845 is ahead with a 1.5% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Phenom X3 8250e pulls ahead with 1.2% better PassMark.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Phenom X3 8250e is the stronger fit. You are getting 1.2% better PassMark, backed by 3 cores and 3 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Atom E3845 still makes the most sense overall. Atom E3845 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 1.5% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Atom E3845 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2013 vs 2008). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Atom E3845 vs Phenom X3 8250e Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Atom E3845

The Atom E3845 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 8 October 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Bay Trail-I (2013) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Max frequency: 1.91 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1170. Thermal design power (TDP): 10 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,071 points. Launch price was $69.

Phenom X3 8250e

The Phenom X3 8250e is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Toliman (2008) architecture. It features 3 cores and 3 threads. Max frequency: 1.9 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: AM2+. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 1,084 points. Launch price was $149.

⚡

Processing Power

The Atom E3845 packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Phenom X3 8250e offers 3 cores / 3 threads — the Atom E3845 has 1 more core. Boost clocks reach 1.91 GHz on the Atom E3845 versus 1.9 GHz on the Phenom X3 8250e — a 0.5% clock advantage for the Atom E3845. The Atom E3845 uses the Bay Trail-I (2013) architecture (22 nm), while the Phenom X3 8250e uses Toliman (2008) (65 nm). In PassMark, the Atom E3845 scores 1,071 against the Phenom X3 8250e's 1,084 — a 1.2% lead for the Phenom X3 8250e. L3 cache: 0 kB on the Atom E3845 vs 2 MB (total) on the Phenom X3 8250e.

Feature	Atom E3845	Phenom X3 8250e
Cores / Threads	4 / 4+33%	3 / 3
Boost Clock	1.91 GHz	1.9 GHz
L3 Cache	0 kB	2 MB (total)
L2 Cache	512 kB (per core)	512 kB (per core)
Process	22 nm-66%	65 nm
Architecture	Bay Trail-I (2013)	Toliman (2008)
PassMark	1,071	1,084+1%

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Atom E3845 uses the FCBGA1170 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Phenom X3 8250e uses AM2+ (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.