Atom E660 vs Atom N270

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Atom E660 vs Atom N270 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Atom E660 vs Atom N270: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Atom E660

2010

Why buy it

✅Draws 3W instead of 512W, a 509W reduction.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (4 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel GMA 600, while Atom N270 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.

Atom N270

2008

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (265 vs 275).
❌16966.7% higher power demand at 512W vs 3W.
❌No integrated graphics, while Atom E660 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Atom E660 better than Atom N270?

Yes. Atom E660 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you 3.8% better PassMark and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Atom E660 has the edge because it leads the single-thread side of this matchup with 1200% higher max boost clock.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Atom E660 is the stronger fit. You are getting 3.8% better PassMark, backed by 1 cores and 2 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Atom E660 still makes the most sense overall. Atom E660 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you 3.8% higher PassMark.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Atom E660 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2010 vs 2008) and more multi-core headroom with 1 cores / 2 threads instead of 1/2. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Atom E660 vs Atom N270 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Atom E660

The Atom E660 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 14 September 2010 (15 years ago). It is based on the Tunnel Creek (2010) architecture. It features 1 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 1.3 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: BGA676. Thermal design power (TDP): 3 Watt. Memory support: DDR2. Passmark benchmark score: 275 points. Launch price was $54.

Atom N270

The Atom N270 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2 April 2008 (17 years ago). It is based on the DiamondVille (2008−2009) architecture. It features 1 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.6 GHz, with boost up to 0.1 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: PBGA437. Thermal design power (TDP): 2.5 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 265 points. Launch price was $44.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Atom E660 and Atom N270 share an identical 1-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 1.3 GHz on the Atom E660 versus 0.1 GHz on the Atom N270 — a 171.4% clock advantage for the Atom E660. The Atom E660 uses the Tunnel Creek (2010) architecture (45 nm), while the Atom N270 uses DiamondVille (2008−2009) (45 nm). In PassMark, the Atom E660 scores 275 against the Atom N270's 265 — a 3.7% lead for the Atom E660. Both processors carry 0 kB of L3 cache.

Feature	Atom E660	Atom N270
Cores / Threads	1 / 2	1 / 2
Boost Clock	1.3 GHz+1200%	0.1 GHz
Base Clock	—	1.6 GHz
L3 Cache	0 kB	0 kB
L2 Cache	512 kB (per core)	512 kB
Process	45 nm	45 nm
Architecture	Tunnel Creek (2010)	DiamondVille (2008−2009)
PassMark	275+4%	265

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Atom E660 uses the BGA676 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Atom N270 uses PBGA437 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR2-800 on the Atom E660 versus DDR2-533 on the Atom N270 — the Atom E660 supports 50.1% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 2 GB of RAM. Both feature 1-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 4 (Atom E660) vs 0 (Atom N270) — the Atom E660 offers 4 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: Intel FCBGA518 (Atom E660) and Intel PBGA437 (Atom N270).