Atom E660
VS
Atom N270

Atom E660 vs Atom N270

Intel

Atom E660

1 Cores2 Thrd3 WWMax: 1.3 GHz2010
VS
Intel

Atom N270

1 Cores2 Thrd512 WWMax: 0.1 GHz2008

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Atom E660 is positioned at rank 743 and the Atom N270 is on rank 411, so the Atom N270 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Atom E660

#731
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
1067%
#732
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
1051%
#733
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
965%
#734
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
961%
#735
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
952%
#737
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
919%
#738
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
881%
#739
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
880%
#740
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
856%
#743
Atom E660
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#744
Pentium 6805
MSRP: $161|Avg: $161
100%
#749
Ryzen 3 7320C
MSRP: $299|Avg: $200
100%
#757
Core i7-11370H
MSRP: $426|Avg: N/A
99%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Atom N270

#124
Core i5-1240P
MSRP: $309|Avg: $200
99%
#125
Core i7-13700H
MSRP: $502|Avg: N/A
98%
#399
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
554%
#400
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
545%
#401
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
501%
#402
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
498%
#403
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
494%
#405
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
477%
#406
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
457%
#407
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
457%
#408
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
444%
#411
Atom N270
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#421
Core i5-9400H
MSRP: $182|Avg: N/A
98%
#426
Celeron 2981U
MSRP: $137|Avg: N/A
98%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Leadership: The Atom E660 delivers superior performance across the board. It outperforms the Atom N270 in both compute-intensive tasks (3.7% faster) and gaming workloads.
InsightAtom E660Atom N270
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Better multi-core power
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Tunnel Creek (2010) / 45 nm)
🛑 Legacy (DiamondVille (2008−2009) / 45 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

InsightAtom E660Atom N270
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Atom E660 and Atom N270

Intel

Atom E660

The Atom E660 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 14 September 2010 (15 years ago). It is based on the Tunnel Creek (2010) architecture. It features 1 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 1.3 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: BGA676. Thermal design power (TDP): 3 Watt. Memory support: DDR2. Passmark benchmark score: 275 points. Launch price was $54.

Intel

Atom N270

The Atom N270 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2 April 2008 (17 years ago). It is based on the DiamondVille (2008−2009) architecture. It features 1 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.6 GHz, with boost up to 0.1 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: PBGA437. Thermal design power (TDP): 2.5 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 265 points. Launch price was $44.

Processing Power

Both the Atom E660 and Atom N270 share an identical 1-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 1.3 GHz on the Atom E660 versus 0.1 GHz on the Atom N270 — a 171.4% clock advantage for the Atom E660. The Atom E660 uses the Tunnel Creek (2010) architecture (45 nm), while the Atom N270 uses DiamondVille (2008−2009) (45 nm). In PassMark, the Atom E660 scores 275 against the Atom N270's 265 — a 3.7% lead for the Atom E660. Both processors carry 0 kB of L3 cache.

FeatureAtom E660Atom N270
Cores / Threads
1 / 2
1 / 2
Boost Clock
1.3 GHz+1200%
0.1 GHz
Base Clock
1.6 GHz
L3 Cache
0 kB
0 kB
L2 Cache
512 kB (per core)
512 kB
Process
45 nm
45 nm
Architecture
Tunnel Creek (2010)
DiamondVille (2008−2009)
PassMark
275+4%
265
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Atom E660 uses the BGA676 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Atom N270 uses PBGA437 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR2-800 memory speed. Both support up to 2 GB of RAM. Both feature 1-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 4 (Atom E660) vs 0 (Atom N270) — the Atom E660 offers 4 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: Intel FCBGA518 (Atom E660) and Intel PBGA437 (Atom N270).

FeatureAtom E660Atom N270
Socket
BGA676
PBGA437
PCIe Generation
PCIe 2.0
PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR2-800
DDR2-533
Max RAM Capacity
2 GB
2 GB
RAM Channels
1
1
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
4
0
🔧

Advanced Features

The Atom E660 includes integrated graphics (Intel GMA 600), while the Atom N270 requires a dedicated GPU.

FeatureAtom E660Atom N270
Integrated GPU
Yes
No
IGPU Model
Intel GMA 600