Atom E660 vs Sempron 2400+

Atom E660 vs Sempron 2400+ Performance Spectrum

Atom E660

1 / 2

275

+5.0%

262

0.0%

Athlon XP 1600+

Athlon XP 1800+

Ryzen 7 4700GE

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Ryzen Threadripper 7970X

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Atom E660 vs Sempron 2400+ FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Atom E660 vs Sempron 2400+: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Atom E660

2010

Why buy it

✅+5% higher PassMark.
✅Draws 3W instead of 62W, a 59W reduction.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (4 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel GMA 600, while Sempron 2400+ needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.

Sempron 2400+

2001

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (262 vs 275).
❌1966.7% higher power demand at 62W vs 3W.
❌No integrated graphics, while Atom E660 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Atom E660 better than Sempron 2400+?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Sempron 2400+ is ahead with 28.5% higher max boost clock. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Atom E660 pulls ahead with 5% better PassMark.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Atom E660 is the stronger fit. You are getting 5% better PassMark, backed by 1 cores and 2 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Atom E660 still makes the most sense overall. Atom E660 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you 5% better PassMark.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Atom E660 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2010 vs 2001) and more multi-core headroom with 1 cores / 2 threads instead of 1/1. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Atom E660 vs Sempron 2400+ Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Atom E660

The Atom E660 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 14 September 2010 (15 years ago). It is based on the Tunnel Creek (2010) architecture. It features 1 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 1.3 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: BGA676. Thermal design power (TDP): 3 Watt. Memory support: DDR2. Passmark benchmark score: 275 points. Launch price was $54.

Sempron 2400+

The Sempron 2400+ is manufactured by AMD. It was released in Janeiro 2001 (24 years ago). It is based on the Barton (2001−2004) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 1.67 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 256 kB. Built on 130 nm process technology. Socket: A. Thermal design power (TDP): 62 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 262 points. Launch price was $27.

⚡

Processing Power

The Atom E660 packs 1 cores / 2 threads, matching the Sempron 2400+'s 1 cores. Boost clocks reach 1.3 GHz on the Atom E660 versus 1.67 GHz on the Sempron 2400+ — a 24.9% clock advantage for the Sempron 2400+. The Atom E660 uses the Tunnel Creek (2010) architecture (45 nm), while the Sempron 2400+ uses Barton (2001−2004) (130 nm). In PassMark, the Atom E660 scores 275 against the Sempron 2400+'s 262 — a 4.8% lead for the Atom E660. Both processors carry 0 kB of L3 cache.

Feature	Atom E660	Sempron 2400+
Cores / Threads	1 / 2	1 / 1
Boost Clock	1.3 GHz	1.67 GHz+28%
L3 Cache	0 kB	0 kB
L2 Cache	512 kB (per core)+100%	256 kB
Process	45 nm-65%	130 nm
Architecture	Tunnel Creek (2010)	Barton (2001−2004)
PassMark	275+5%	262