Atom N270
VS
Athlon XP 2200+

Atom N270 vs Athlon XP 2200+

Intel

Atom N270

1 Cores2 Thrd512 WWMax: 0.1 GHz2008
VS
AMD

Athlon XP 2200+

1 Cores1 Thrd68 WWMax: 1.8 GHz2001

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Atom N270 is positioned at rank 411 and the Athlon XP 2200+ is on rank 1121, so the Atom N270 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Atom N270

#124
Core i5-1240P
MSRP: $309|Avg: $200
99%
#125
Core i7-13700H
MSRP: $502|Avg: N/A
98%
#399
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
554%
#400
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
545%
#401
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
501%
#402
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
498%
#403
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
494%
#405
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
477%
#406
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
457%
#407
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
457%
#408
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
444%
#411
Atom N270
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#421
Core i5-9400H
MSRP: $182|Avg: N/A
98%
#426
Celeron 2981U
MSRP: $137|Avg: N/A
98%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Athlon XP 2200+

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
268720%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
253914%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
184362%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
55541%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
43994%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
38486%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
22043%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
21755%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
19809%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
19807%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
19585%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
19057%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
18791%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
18715%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
18545%
#1121
Athlon XP 2200+
MSRP: $241|Avg: $30
100%
#1122
Athlon XP 1700+
MSRP: $190|Avg: $15
97%
#1123
Pentium Extreme Edition 955
MSRP: $999|Avg: $50
95%
#1124
Athlon XP 2700+
MSRP: $349|Avg: $20
89%
#1125
Athlon XP 2800+
MSRP: $375|Avg: $35
87%
#1126
Pentium III 1200
MSRP: $200|Avg: $10
84%
#1127
Athlon XP 3200+
MSRP: $464|Avg: $40
83%
#1128
Pentium III 1400S
MSRP: $250|Avg: $250
78%
#1129
Pentium 4 2.60
MSRP: $401|Avg: $25
78%
#1130
Pentium III 1400
MSRP: $250|Avg: $20
78%
#1131
Athlon XP 1800+
MSRP: $252|Avg: $30
77%
#1132
Athlon XP 1900+
MSRP: $269|Avg: $20
76%
#1133
Athlon 64 FX-51
MSRP: $733|Avg: $733
72%
#1134
Athlon 64 FX-55
MSRP: $827|Avg: $50
72%
#1135
Athlon 64 FX-53
MSRP: $799|Avg: $15
70%
#1136
Athlon XP 2000+
MSRP: $339|Avg: $40
64%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Generational Difference: This comparison involves processors from different technological eras. The Atom N270 (2008) utilizes 45 nm technology and modern memory, providing a fundamental performance advantage.
InsightAtom N270Athlon XP 2200+
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($30)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (DiamondVille (2008−2009) / 45 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Thorton (2001−2003) / 130 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Athlon XP 2200+ (2001) relies on 130 nm technology and older memory, placing it in a different performance category relative to modern standards.
InsightAtom N270Athlon XP 2200+
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($30)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Atom N270 and Athlon XP 2200+

Intel

Atom N270

The Atom N270 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2 April 2008 (17 years ago). It is based on the DiamondVille (2008−2009) architecture. It features 1 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.6 GHz, with boost up to 0.1 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: PBGA437. Thermal design power (TDP): 2.5 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 265 points. Launch price was $44.

AMD

Athlon XP 2200+

The Athlon XP 2200+ is manufactured by AMD. It was released in Janeiro 2001 (24 years ago). It is based on the Thorton (2001−2003) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 1.8 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 256 kB. Built on 130 nm process technology. Socket: A. Thermal design power (TDP): 68 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 280 points. Launch price was $85.

Processing Power

The Atom N270 packs 1 cores / 2 threads, matching the Athlon XP 2200+'s 1 cores. Boost clocks reach 0.1 GHz on the Atom N270 versus 1.8 GHz on the Athlon XP 2200+ — a 178.9% clock advantage for the Athlon XP 2200+. The Atom N270 uses the DiamondVille (2008−2009) architecture (45 nm), while the Athlon XP 2200+ uses Thorton (2001−2003) (130 nm). In PassMark, the Atom N270 scores 265 against the Athlon XP 2200+'s 280 — a 5.5% lead for the Athlon XP 2200+. Both processors carry 0 kB of L3 cache.

FeatureAtom N270Athlon XP 2200+
Cores / Threads
1 / 2
1 / 1
Boost Clock
0.1 GHz
1.8 GHz+1700%
Base Clock
1.6 GHz
L3 Cache
0 kB
0 kB
L2 Cache
512 kB+100%
256 kB
Process
45 nm-65%
130 nm
Architecture
DiamondVille (2008−2009)
Thorton (2001−2003)
PassMark
265
280+6%
Geekbench 6 Single
200
Geekbench 6 Multi
200
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Atom N270 uses the PBGA437 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Athlon XP 2200+ uses A (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR2-533 on the Atom N270 versus DDR-266 on the Athlon XP 2200+ — the Atom N270 supports -203% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 2 GB of RAM. Both feature 1-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 0 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: Intel PBGA437 (Atom N270) and KT333,nForce2 (Athlon XP 2200+).

FeatureAtom N270Athlon XP 2200+
Socket
PBGA437
A
PCIe Generation
PCIe 2.0+82%
PCIe 1.1
Max RAM Speed
DDR2-533
DDR-266
Max RAM Capacity
2 GB
2 GB
RAM Channels
1
1
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
0
0
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Atom N270) / None (Athlon XP 2200+). Primary use case: Athlon XP 2200+ targets Legacy Desktop.

FeatureAtom N270Athlon XP 2200+
Integrated GPU
No
No
Unlocked
Yes
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
None
Target Use
Legacy Desktop