Atom N270
VS
Sempron 2600+

Atom N270 vs Sempron 2600+

Intel

Atom N270

1 Cores2 Thrd512 WWMax: 0.1 GHz2008
VS
AMD

Sempron 2600+

1 Cores1 Thrd62 WWMax: 1.83 GHz2001

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Atom N270 is positioned at rank 411 and the Sempron 2600+ is on rank 1000, so the Atom N270 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Atom N270

#124
Core i5-1240P
MSRP: $309|Avg: $200
99%
#125
Core i7-13700H
MSRP: $502|Avg: N/A
98%
#399
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
554%
#400
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
545%
#401
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
501%
#402
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
498%
#403
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
494%
#405
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
477%
#406
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
457%
#407
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
457%
#408
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
444%
#411
Atom N270
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#421
Core i5-9400H
MSRP: $182|Avg: N/A
98%
#426
Celeron 2981U
MSRP: $137|Avg: N/A
98%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Sempron 2600+

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
32136%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
30365%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
22047%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
6642%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
5261%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
4602%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
2636%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
2602%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
2369%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
2369%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
2342%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
2279%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
2247%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
2238%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
2218%
#1000
Sempron 2600+
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#1001
Core 2 Duo E4400
MSRP: $113|Avg: $20
100%
#1002
Pentium D 915
MSRP: $74|Avg: $10
98%
#1003
Core 2 Quad Q9400
MSRP: $229|Avg: $25
97%
#1004
Celeron 450
MSRP: $53|Avg: $5
96%
#1005
Core i5-655K
MSRP: $216|Avg: $55
96%
#1006
Core 2 Duo E4600
MSRP: $133|Avg: $9.6
96%
#1008
Core i7-870S
MSRP: $300|Avg: $80
95%
#1009
Core 2 Duo E6540
MSRP: $163|Avg: $15
95%
#1010
Celeron 430
MSRP: $49|Avg: $10
94%
#1011
Athlon X2 BE-2300
MSRP: $100|Avg: $80
93%
#1012
Core i7-875K
MSRP: $353|Avg: $175
93%
#1013
Core i5-670
MSRP: $284|Avg: $100
93%
#1014
Core i5-680
MSRP: $294|Avg: $10
92%
#1015
Core 2 Duo E4300
MSRP: $113|Avg: $5
92%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Generational Difference: This comparison involves processors from different technological eras. The Atom N270 (2008) utilizes 45 nm technology and modern memory, providing a fundamental performance advantage.
InsightAtom N270Sempron 2600+
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (DiamondVille (2008−2009) / 45 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Palermo (2001−2005) / 130 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Sempron 2600+ (2001) relies on 130 nm technology and older memory, placing it in a different performance category relative to modern standards.
InsightAtom N270Sempron 2600+
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Atom N270 and Sempron 2600+

Intel

Atom N270

The Atom N270 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2 April 2008 (17 years ago). It is based on the DiamondVille (2008−2009) architecture. It features 1 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.6 GHz, with boost up to 0.1 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: PBGA437. Thermal design power (TDP): 2.5 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 265 points. Launch price was $44.

AMD

Sempron 2600+

The Sempron 2600+ is manufactured by AMD. It was released in Janeiro 2001 (24 years ago). It is based on the Palermo (2001−2005) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 1.83 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 256K. Built on 130 nm process technology. Socket: 754. Thermal design power (TDP): 62 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 291 points. Launch price was $60.

Processing Power

The Atom N270 packs 1 cores / 2 threads, matching the Sempron 2600+'s 1 cores. Boost clocks reach 0.1 GHz on the Atom N270 versus 1.83 GHz on the Sempron 2600+ — a 179.3% clock advantage for the Sempron 2600+. The Atom N270 uses the DiamondVille (2008−2009) architecture (45 nm), while the Sempron 2600+ uses Palermo (2001−2005) (130 nm). In PassMark, the Atom N270 scores 265 against the Sempron 2600+'s 291 — a 9.4% lead for the Sempron 2600+. Both processors carry 0 kB of L3 cache.

FeatureAtom N270Sempron 2600+
Cores / Threads
1 / 2
1 / 1
Boost Clock
0.1 GHz
1.83 GHz+1730%
Base Clock
1.6 GHz
L3 Cache
0 kB
0 kB
L2 Cache
512 kB+100%
256K
Process
45 nm-65%
130 nm
Architecture
DiamondVille (2008−2009)
Palermo (2001−2005)
PassMark
265
291+10%
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Atom N270 uses the PBGA437 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Sempron 2600+ uses 754 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureAtom N270Sempron 2600+
Socket
PBGA437
754
PCIe Generation
PCIe 2.0
PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR2-533
Max RAM Capacity
2 GB
RAM Channels
1
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
0