Atom N270
VS
Pentium III 1400S

Atom N270 vs Pentium III 1400S

Intel

Atom N270

1 Cores2 Thrd512 WWMax: 0.1 GHz2008
VS
Intel

Pentium III 1400S

1 Cores1 Thrd32 WWMax: 1.4 GHz2002

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Atom N270 is positioned at rank 411 and the Pentium III 1400S is on rank 1128, so the Atom N270 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Atom N270

#124
Core i5-1240P
MSRP: $309|Avg: $200
99%
#125
Core i7-13700H
MSRP: $502|Avg: N/A
98%
#399
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
554%
#400
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
545%
#401
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
501%
#402
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
498%
#403
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
494%
#405
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
477%
#406
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
457%
#407
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
457%
#408
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
444%
#411
Atom N270
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#421
Core i5-9400H
MSRP: $182|Avg: N/A
98%
#426
Celeron 2981U
MSRP: $137|Avg: N/A
98%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Pentium III 1400S

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
342544%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
323670%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
235011%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
70799%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
56080%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
49059%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
28099%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
27732%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
25251%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
25248%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
24966%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
24292%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
23953%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
23856%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
23640%
#1126
Pentium III 1400
MSRP: $250|Avg: $20
100%
#1127
Pentium 4 2.60
MSRP: $401|Avg: $25
100%
#1128
Pentium III 1400S
MSRP: $250|Avg: $250
100%
#1129
Athlon XP 1800+
MSRP: $252|Avg: $30
98%
#1130
Athlon XP 1900+
MSRP: $269|Avg: $20
97%
#1131
Athlon 64 FX-51
MSRP: $733|Avg: $733
92%
#1132
Athlon 64 FX-55
MSRP: $827|Avg: $50
91%
#1133
Athlon 64 FX-53
MSRP: $799|Avg: $15
89%
#1134
Athlon XP 2000+
MSRP: $339|Avg: $40
81%
#1135
Athlon 64 FX-57
MSRP: $1031|Avg: $200
77%
#1136
Athlon XP 3000+
MSRP: $588|Avg: $20
76%
#1137
Athlon XP 2100+
MSRP: $420|Avg: $30
69%
#1138
Pentium III 1266S
MSRP: $369|Avg: $20
63%
#1139
Pentium 4 1.80
MSRP: $562|Avg: $40
44%
#1140
Pentium III 1133
MSRP: $990|Avg: $30
20%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Generational Difference: This comparison involves processors from different technological eras. The Atom N270 (2008) utilizes 45 nm technology and modern memory, providing a fundamental performance advantage.
InsightAtom N270Pentium III 1400S
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Better multi-core power
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($250)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (DiamondVille (2008−2009) / 45 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Tualatin (2000−2002) / 130 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Pentium III 1400S (2002) relies on 130 nm technology and older memory, placing it in a different performance category relative to modern standards.
InsightAtom N270Pentium III 1400S
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($250)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Atom N270 and Pentium III 1400S

Intel

Atom N270

The Atom N270 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2 April 2008 (17 years ago). It is based on the DiamondVille (2008−2009) architecture. It features 1 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.6 GHz, with boost up to 0.1 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: PBGA437. Thermal design power (TDP): 2.5 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 265 points. Launch price was $44.

Intel

Pentium III 1400S

The Pentium III 1400S is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Tualatin (2000−2002) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 1.4 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 130 nm process technology. Socket: PGA370. Thermal design power (TDP): 32 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 228 points. Launch price was $69.

Processing Power

The Atom N270 packs 1 cores / 2 threads, matching the Pentium III 1400S's 1 cores. Boost clocks reach 0.1 GHz on the Atom N270 versus 1.4 GHz on the Pentium III 1400S — a 173.3% clock advantage for the Pentium III 1400S. The Atom N270 uses the DiamondVille (2008−2009) architecture (45 nm), while the Pentium III 1400S uses Tualatin (2000−2002) (130 nm). In PassMark, the Atom N270 scores 265 against the Pentium III 1400S's 228 — a 15% lead for the Atom N270. Both processors carry 0 kB of L3 cache.

FeatureAtom N270Pentium III 1400S
Cores / Threads
1 / 2
1 / 1
Boost Clock
0.1 GHz
1.4 GHz+1300%
Base Clock
1.6 GHz
L3 Cache
0 kB
0 kB
L2 Cache
512 kB
512 kB
Process
45 nm-65%
130 nm
Architecture
DiamondVille (2008−2009)
Tualatin (2000−2002)
PassMark
265+16%
228
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Atom N270 uses the PBGA437 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Pentium III 1400S uses PGA370 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR2-533 on the Atom N270 versus PC133 on the Pentium III 1400S — the Pentium III 1400S supports 194.1% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Pentium III 1400S supports up to 4 GB of RAM compared to 2 GB 66.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 1-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 0 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: Intel PBGA437 (Atom N270) and Intel 815,VIA Apollo Pro 133T (Pentium III 1400S).

FeatureAtom N270Pentium III 1400S
Socket
PBGA437
PGA370
PCIe Generation
PCIe 2.0+82%
PCIe 1.1
Max RAM Speed
DDR2-533
PC133+6550%
Max RAM Capacity
2 GB
4 GB+100%
RAM Channels
1
1
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
0
0
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Atom N270) / No (Pentium III 1400S).

FeatureAtom N270Pentium III 1400S
Integrated GPU
No
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
No