Atom N435 vs Mobile Sempron SI-40

Intel

Atom N435

1 Cores2 Thrd512 WWMax: 1.33 GHz2011
Similar parts
·······
VS
AMD

Mobile Sempron SI-40

1 Cores1 Thrd512 WWMax: 2 GHz2008
Similar parts
·······

Atom N435 vs Mobile Sempron SI-40 Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Atom N435 vs Mobile Sempron SI-40 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Atom N435 vs Mobile Sempron SI-40: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Atom N435

2011

Why buy it

  • +4% higher PassMark.
  • Integrated graphics onboard with Intel GMA 3150, while Mobile Sempron SI-40 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

  • Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.

Mobile Sempron SI-40

2008

Why buy it

    Trade-offs

    • Lower PassMark (322 vs 335).
    • No integrated graphics, while Atom N435 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

    Quick Answers

    So, is Atom N435 better than Mobile Sempron SI-40?
    It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Mobile Sempron SI-40 is ahead with 50.4% higher max boost clock. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Atom N435 pulls ahead with 4% better PassMark.
    Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
    For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Atom N435 is the stronger fit. You are getting 4% better PassMark, backed by 1 cores and 2 threads.
    Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
    Atom N435 still makes the most sense overall. Atom N435 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you 4% better PassMark.
    Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
    Atom N435 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2011 vs 2008) and more multi-core headroom with 1 cores / 2 threads instead of 1/1. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

    Atom N435 vs Mobile Sempron SI-40 Technical Specifications

    Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

    Intel

    Atom N435

    The Atom N435 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2 June 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Pinetrail (2009−2011) architecture. It features 1 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 1.33 GHz. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA559. Thermal design power (TDP): 512 kB. Memory support: DDR2, DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 335 points. Launch price was $69.

    AMD

    Mobile Sempron SI-40

    The Mobile Sempron SI-40 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 4 July 2008 (17 years ago). It is based on the Sable (2008−2009) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 2 GHz. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: S1g2. Thermal design power (TDP): 512 kB. Passmark benchmark score: 322 points. Launch price was $69.

    Processing Power

    The Atom N435 packs 1 cores / 2 threads, matching the Mobile Sempron SI-40's 1 cores. Boost clocks reach 1.33 GHz on the Atom N435 versus 2 GHz on the Mobile Sempron SI-40 — a 40.2% clock advantage for the Mobile Sempron SI-40. The Atom N435 uses the Pinetrail (2009−2011) architecture (45 nm), while the Mobile Sempron SI-40 uses Sable (2008−2009) (65 nm). In PassMark, the Atom N435 scores 335 against the Mobile Sempron SI-40's 322 — a 4% lead for the Atom N435.

    FeatureAtom N435Mobile Sempron SI-40
    Cores / Threads
    1 / 2
    1 / 1
    Boost Clock
    1.33 GHz
    2 GHz+50%
    L2 Cache
    512 kB
    512 kB
    Process
    45 nm-31%
    65 nm
    Architecture
    Pinetrail (2009−2011)
    Sable (2008−2009)
    PassMark
    335+4%
    322
    🧠

    Memory & Platform

    The Atom N435 uses the FCBGA559 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Mobile Sempron SI-40 uses S1g2 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

    FeatureAtom N435Mobile Sempron SI-40
    Socket
    FCBGA559
    S1g2
    PCIe Generation
    PCIe 2.0
    PCIe 2.0
    Max RAM Speed
    DDR3-800
    Max RAM Capacity
    2 GB
    RAM Channels
    1
    ECC Support
    No
    PCIe Lanes
    0
    🔧

    Advanced Features

    The Atom N435 includes integrated graphics (Intel GMA 3150), while the Mobile Sempron SI-40 requires a dedicated GPU.

    FeatureAtom N435Mobile Sempron SI-40
    Integrated GPU
    Yes
    IGPU Model
    Intel GMA 3150