Atom N470 vs Atom N475

Intel

Atom N470

1 Cores2 Thrd512 WWMax: 1.83 GHz2010
Similar parts
·······
VS
Intel

Atom N475

1 Cores2 Thrd512 WWMax: 1.83 GHz2010
Similar parts
·······

Atom N470 vs Atom N475 Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Atom N470 vs Atom N475 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Atom N470 vs Atom N475: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Atom N470

2010

Why buy it

    Trade-offs

    • Lower PassMark (385 vs 405).

    Atom N475

    2010

    Why buy it

    • +5.2% higher PassMark.

    Trade-offs

    • Launch MSRP is still $75 MSRP, while Atom N470 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

    Quick Answers

    So, is Atom N475 better than Atom N470?
    Yes. Atom N475 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you 5.2% better PassMark and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.
    Which one is better for gaming?
    For gaming, this matchup is basically a tie in the data we have.
    Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
    For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Atom N475 is the stronger fit. You are getting 5.2% better PassMark, backed by 1 cores and 2 threads.
    Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
    Atom N475 is the better buy right now. Atom N475 comes in at an unclear MSRP at $75 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you 5.2% higher PassMark. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (5.4 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.
    Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
    Atom N475 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting more multi-core headroom with 1 cores / 2 threads instead of 1/2. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

    Atom N470 vs Atom N475 Technical Specifications

    Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

    Intel

    Atom N470

    The Atom N470 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 March 2010 (15 years ago). It is based on the Pineview (2009−2011) architecture. It features 1 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.83 GHz, with boost up to 1.83 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA559. Thermal design power (TDP): 6.5 Watt. Memory support: DDR2. Passmark benchmark score: 385 points. Launch price was $75.

    Intel

    Atom N475

    The Atom N475 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 June 2010 (15 years ago). It is based on the Pineview (2009−2011) architecture. It features 1 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.83 GHz, with boost up to 1.83 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA559. Thermal design power (TDP): 6.5 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 405 points. Launch price was $75.

    Processing Power

    Both the Atom N470 and Atom N475 share an identical 1-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 1.83 GHz on the Atom N470 versus 1.83 GHz on the Atom N475 — identical boost frequencies (base: 1.83 GHz vs 1.83 GHz). Both are built on the Pineview (2009−2011) architecture using a 45 nm process. In PassMark, the Atom N470 scores 385 against the Atom N475's 405 — a 5.1% lead for the Atom N475. Both processors carry 0 kB of L3 cache.

    FeatureAtom N470Atom N475
    Cores / Threads
    1 / 2
    1 / 2
    Boost Clock
    1.83 GHz
    1.83 GHz
    Base Clock
    1.83 GHz
    1.83 GHz
    L3 Cache
    0 kB
    0 kB
    L2 Cache
    512K (per core)
    512K (per core)
    Process
    45 nm
    45 nm
    Architecture
    Pineview (2009−2011)
    Pineview (2009−2011)
    PassMark
    385
    405+5%
    🧠

    Memory & Platform

    Both processors use the FCBGA559 socket with PCIe 2.0. Both support up to DDR2-667 memory speed. Both support up to 2 GB of RAM. Both feature 1-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 0 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: Intel NM10 (Atom N470) and Intel NM10 (Atom N475).

    FeatureAtom N470Atom N475
    Socket
    FCBGA559
    FCBGA559
    PCIe Generation
    PCIe 2.0
    PCIe 2.0
    Max RAM Speed
    DDR2-667
    DDR3-667
    Max RAM Capacity
    2 GB
    2 GB
    RAM Channels
    1
    1
    ECC Support
    No
    No
    PCIe Lanes
    0
    0
    🔧

    Advanced Features

    Both include integrated graphics Intel GMA 3150 (Atom N470) and Intel GMA 3150 (Atom N475) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU.

    FeatureAtom N470Atom N475
    Integrated GPU
    Yes
    Yes
    IGPU Model
    Intel GMA 3150
    Intel GMA 3150