Atom N470 vs Sempron 3200+

Intel

Atom N470

1 Cores2 Thrd512 WWMax: 1.83 GHz2010
Similar parts
·······
VS
AMD

Sempron 3200+

1 Cores1 Thrd62 WWMax: 1.8 GHz2005
Similar parts
·······

Atom N470 vs Sempron 3200+ Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Atom N470 vs Sempron 3200+ FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Atom N470 vs Sempron 3200+: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Atom N470

2010

Why buy it

  • Integrated graphics onboard with Intel GMA 3150, while Sempron 3200+ needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

  • Lower PassMark (385 vs 391).
  • 725.8% higher power demand at 512W vs 62W.

Sempron 3200+

2005

Why buy it

  • +1.6% higher PassMark.
  • Draws 62W instead of 512W, a 450W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • No integrated graphics, while Atom N470 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Sempron 3200+ better than Atom N470?
It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Atom N470 is ahead with a 0.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Sempron 3200+ pulls ahead with 1.6% better PassMark.
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Sempron 3200+ is the stronger fit. You are getting 1.6% better PassMark, backed by 1 cores and 1 threads.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Sempron 3200+ still makes the most sense overall. Sempron 3200+ comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you 1.6% better PassMark.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Atom N470 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2010 vs 2005). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Atom N470 vs Sempron 3200+ Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Intel

Atom N470

The Atom N470 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 March 2010 (15 years ago). It is based on the Pineview (2009−2011) architecture. It features 1 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.83 GHz, with boost up to 1.83 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA559. Thermal design power (TDP): 6.5 Watt. Memory support: DDR2. Passmark benchmark score: 385 points. Launch price was $75.

AMD

Sempron 3200+

The Sempron 3200+ is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 1 October 2005 (20 years ago). It is based on the Palermo (2001−2005) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 1.8 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 256 kB. Built on 90 nm process technology. Socket: 939. Thermal design power (TDP): 62 Watt. Memory support: DDR1. Passmark benchmark score: 391 points. Launch price was $13.

Processing Power

The Atom N470 packs 1 cores / 2 threads, matching the Sempron 3200+'s 1 cores. Boost clocks reach 1.83 GHz on the Atom N470 versus 1.8 GHz on the Sempron 3200+ — a 1.7% clock advantage for the Atom N470. The Atom N470 uses the Pineview (2009−2011) architecture (45 nm), while the Sempron 3200+ uses Palermo (2001−2005) (90 nm). In PassMark, the Atom N470 scores 385 against the Sempron 3200+'s 391 — a 1.5% lead for the Sempron 3200+. Both processors carry 0 kB of L3 cache.

FeatureAtom N470Sempron 3200+
Cores / Threads
1 / 2
1 / 1
Boost Clock
1.83 GHz+2%
1.8 GHz
Base Clock
1.83 GHz
L3 Cache
0 kB
0 kB
L2 Cache
512K (per core)+100%
256 kB
Process
45 nm-50%
90 nm
Architecture
Pineview (2009−2011)
Palermo (2001−2005)
PassMark
385
391+2%
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Atom N470 uses the FCBGA559 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Sempron 3200+ uses 939 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureAtom N470Sempron 3200+
Socket
FCBGA559
939
PCIe Generation
PCIe 2.0
PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR2-667
Max RAM Capacity
2 GB
RAM Channels
1
ECC Support
No
PCIe Lanes
0
🔧

Advanced Features

The Atom N470 includes integrated graphics (Intel GMA 3150), while the Sempron 3200+ requires a dedicated GPU.

FeatureAtom N470Sempron 3200+
Integrated GPU
Yes
IGPU Model
Intel GMA 3150