
Atom x5-E3940

Ryzen 9 5900X
Atom x5-E3940 vs Ryzen 9 5900X Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Atom x5-E3940 vs Ryzen 9 5900X FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Atom x5-E3940 vs Ryzen 9 5900X: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Atom x5-E3940
2014Why buy it
- ✅Draws 10W instead of 105W, a 95W reduction.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel HD Graphics 500, while Ryzen 9 5900X needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 9 5900X across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (1,816 vs 38,955).
Ryzen 9 5900X
2020Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +535.1% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅300% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 6) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $549 MSRP, while Atom x5-E3940 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌950% higher power demand at 105W vs 10W.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Atom x5-E3940 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 9 5900X better than Atom x5-E3940?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Atom x5-E3940 vs Ryzen 9 5900X Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Atom x5-E3940
The Atom x5-E3940 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 30 August 2014 (11 years ago). It is based on the Apollo Lake (2014−2016) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.6 GHz, with boost up to 1.8 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 2 MB (total). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1296. Thermal design power (TDP): 10 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-1866. Passmark benchmark score: 1,816 points. Launch price was $69.


Ryzen 9 5900X
The Ryzen 9 5900X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 5 November 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Vermeer (Zen3) (2020−2022) architecture. It features 12 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 3.7 GHz, with boost up to 4.8 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 105 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 38,955 points. Launch price was $549.
Processing Power
The Atom x5-E3940 packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Ryzen 9 5900X offers 12 cores / 24 threads — the Ryzen 9 5900X has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 1.8 GHz on the Atom x5-E3940 versus 4.8 GHz on the Ryzen 9 5900X — a 90.9% clock advantage for the Ryzen 9 5900X (base: 1.6 GHz vs 3.7 GHz). The Atom x5-E3940 uses the Apollo Lake (2014−2016) architecture (14 nm), while the Ryzen 9 5900X uses Vermeer (Zen3) (2020−2022) (7 nm, 12 nm). In PassMark, the Atom x5-E3940 scores 1,816 against the Ryzen 9 5900X's 38,955 — a 182.2% lead for the Ryzen 9 5900X. L3 cache: 0 kB on the Atom x5-E3940 vs 64 MB on the Ryzen 9 5900X.
| Feature | Atom x5-E3940 | Ryzen 9 5900X |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 4 | 12 / 24+200% |
| Boost Clock | 1.8 GHz | 4.8 GHz+167% |
| Base Clock | 1.6 GHz | 3.7 GHz+131% |
| L3 Cache | 0 kB | 64 MB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB (total) | 512K (per core)+25500% |
| Process | 14 nm | 7 nm, 12 nm-50% |
| Architecture | Apollo Lake (2014−2016) | Vermeer (Zen3) (2020−2022) |
| PassMark | 1,816 | 38,955+2045% |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | — | 21,000 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 2,174 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 11,888 |
Memory & Platform
The Atom x5-E3940 uses the FCBGA1296 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Ryzen 9 5900X uses AM4 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3L-1866 on the Atom x5-E3940 versus DDR4-3200 on the Ryzen 9 5900X — the Ryzen 9 5900X supports 71.5% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Ryzen 9 5900X supports up to 128 GB of RAM compared to 8 GB — 1500% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 6 (Atom x5-E3940) vs 24 (Ryzen 9 5900X) — the Ryzen 9 5900X offers 18 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: Intel FCBGA1296 (Atom x5-E3940) and A320,B350,X370,B450,X470,B550,X570 (Ryzen 9 5900X).
| Feature | Atom x5-E3940 | Ryzen 9 5900X |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FCBGA1296 | AM4 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 4.0+33% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR3L-1866 | DDR4-3200+71% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 8 GB | 128 GB+1500% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 6 | 24+300% |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: not specified (Atom x5-E3940) / AMD-V (Ryzen 9 5900X). The Atom x5-E3940 includes integrated graphics (Intel HD Graphics 500), while the Ryzen 9 5900X requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Ryzen 9 5900X targets Workstation. Direct competitor: Ryzen 9 5900X rivals Core i9-12900K.
| Feature | Atom x5-E3940 | Ryzen 9 5900X |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | No |
| IGPU Model | Intel HD Graphics 500 | — |
| Unlocked | — | Yes |
| AVX-512 | — | No |
| Virtualization | — | AMD-V |
| Target Use | — | Workstation |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.













