Atom x5-Z8330 vs Celeron N2930

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Atom x5-Z8330 vs Celeron N2930 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Atom x5-Z8330 vs Celeron N2930: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Atom x5-Z8330

2016

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,025 vs 1,032).

Celeron N2930

2014

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.

Quick Answers

So, is Celeron N2930 better than Atom x5-Z8330?

Yes. Celeron N2930 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 0.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 0.7% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Celeron N2930 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 0.2% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Celeron N2930 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.7% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Celeron N2930 still makes the most sense overall. Celeron N2930 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 0.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Atom x5-Z8330 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2016 vs 2014). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Atom x5-Z8330 vs Celeron N2930 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Atom x5-Z8330

The Atom x5-Z8330 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 8 February 2016 (9 years ago). It is based on the Airmont (2016) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.44 GHz, with boost up to 1.92 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Memory support: DDR3L-RS 1600. Passmark benchmark score: 1,025 points. Launch price was $69.

Celeron N2930

The Celeron N2930 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Bay Trail-M (2013−2014) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.83 GHz, with boost up to 2.16 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1170. Thermal design power (TDP): 7.5 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,032 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Atom x5-Z8330 and Celeron N2930 share an identical 4-core/4-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 1.92 GHz on the Atom x5-Z8330 versus 2.16 GHz on the Celeron N2930 — a 11.8% clock advantage for the Celeron N2930 (base: 1.44 GHz vs 1.83 GHz). The Atom x5-Z8330 uses the Airmont (2016) architecture (14 nm), while the Celeron N2930 uses Bay Trail-M (2013−2014) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Atom x5-Z8330 scores 1,025 against the Celeron N2930's 1,032 — a 0.7% lead for the Celeron N2930. Both processors carry 0 kB of L3 cache.

Feature	Atom x5-Z8330	Celeron N2930
Cores / Threads	4 / 4	4 / 4
Boost Clock	1.92 GHz	2.16 GHz+13%
Base Clock	1.44 GHz	1.83 GHz+27%
L3 Cache	0 kB	0 kB
L2 Cache	2 MB	512K (per core)+25500%
Process	14 nm-36%	22 nm
Architecture	Airmont (2016)	Bay Trail-M (2013−2014)
PassMark	1,025	1,032
Geekbench 6 Single	—	170
Geekbench 6 Multi	—	502

🧠

Memory & Platform

Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3L-RS 1600 on the Atom x5-Z8330 versus DDR3L-1333 on the Celeron N2930 — the Atom x5-Z8330 supports 20% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Celeron N2930 supports up to 8 GB of RAM compared to 2 GB — 300% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 1 (Atom x5-Z8330) vs 2 (Celeron N2930). PCIe lanes: 1 (Atom x5-Z8330) vs 4 (Celeron N2930) — the Celeron N2930 offers 3 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: Intel FC-UTBGA592 (Atom x5-Z8330) and SoC (Celeron N2930).

Feature	Atom x5-Z8330	Celeron N2930
Socket	—	FCBGA1170
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0+50%	PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR3L-RS 1600+20%	DDR3L-1333
Max RAM Capacity	2 GB	8 GB+300%
RAM Channels	1	2+100%
ECC Support	No	No
PCIe Lanes	1	4+300%

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Atom x5-Z8330) / Yes (Celeron N2930). Both include integrated graphics — Intel HD Graphics (Cherry Trail) (Atom x5-Z8330) and Intel HD Graphics (Celeron N2930) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU.