Atom x5-Z8330 vs V-Series V105

Atom x5-Z8330 vs V-Series V105 Performance Spectrum

Atom x5-Z8330

4 / 4

1,025

0.0%

1,028

+0.3%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Atom x5-Z8330 vs V-Series V105 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Atom x5-Z8330 vs V-Series V105: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Atom x5-Z8330

2016

Why buy it

✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel HD Graphics (Cherry Trail), while V-Series V105 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,025 vs 1,028).

V-Series V105

2010

Why buy it

✅+0.3% higher PassMark.

Trade-offs

❌No integrated graphics, while Atom x5-Z8330 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is V-Series V105 better than Atom x5-Z8330?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Atom x5-Z8330 is ahead with a 0.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, V-Series V105 pulls ahead with 0.3% better PassMark.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, V-Series V105 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.3% better PassMark, backed by 1 cores and 1 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

V-Series V105 still makes the most sense overall. V-Series V105 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you 0.3% better PassMark.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Atom x5-Z8330 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2016 vs 2010). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Atom x5-Z8330 vs V-Series V105 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Atom x5-Z8330

The Atom x5-Z8330 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 8 February 2016 (9 years ago). It is based on the Airmont (2016) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.44 GHz, with boost up to 1.92 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Memory support: DDR3L-RS 1600. Passmark benchmark score: 1,025 points. Launch price was $69.

V-Series V105

The V-Series V105 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 12 May 2010 (15 years ago). It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 1.2 GHz. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: S1. Thermal design power (TDP): 512 kB. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,028 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

The Atom x5-Z8330 packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the V-Series V105 offers 1 cores / 1 threads — the Atom x5-Z8330 has 3 more cores. Boost clocks reach 1.92 GHz on the Atom x5-Z8330 versus 1.2 GHz on the V-Series V105 — a 46.2% clock advantage for the Atom x5-Z8330. The Atom x5-Z8330 is built on the Airmont (2016) architecture. In PassMark, the Atom x5-Z8330 scores 1,025 against the V-Series V105's 1,028 — a 0.3% lead for the V-Series V105.

Feature	Atom x5-Z8330	V-Series V105
Cores / Threads	4 / 4+300%	1 / 1
Boost Clock	1.92 GHz+60%	1.2 GHz
Base Clock	1.44 GHz	—
L3 Cache	0 kB	—
L2 Cache	2 MB+300%	512 kB
Process	14 nm-69%	45 nm
Architecture	Airmont (2016)	—
PassMark	1,025	1,028