Atom x5-Z8350 vs FX-4300

Atom x5-Z8350 vs FX-4300 Performance Spectrum

Atom x5-Z8350

4 / 4

2,979

0.0%

2,995

+0.5%

Ryzen Threadripper 1920

Ryzen AI Max 390

Ryzen 9 9955HX3D

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Atom x5-Z8350 vs FX-4300 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Atom x5-Z8350 vs FX-4300: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Atom x5-Z8350

2016

Why buy it

✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel HD Graphics (Cherry Trail), while FX-4300 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than FX-4300 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (2,979 vs 2,995).

FX-4300

2012

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +5.1% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.

Trade-offs

❌Launch MSRP is still $122 MSRP, while Atom x5-Z8350 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌No integrated graphics, while Atom x5-Z8350 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is FX-4300 better than Atom x5-Z8350?

Yes. FX-4300 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 5.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 0.5% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, FX-4300 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 5.1% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, FX-4300 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.5% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

FX-4300 is the better buy right now. FX-4300 comes in at an unclear MSRP at $122 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 5.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (24.5 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Atom x5-Z8350 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2016 vs 2012). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Atom x5-Z8350 vs FX-4300 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Atom x5-Z8350

The Atom x5-Z8350 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 8 February 2016 (9 years ago). It is based on the Cherry Trail (2015−2016) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.44 GHz, with boost up to 1.92 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: UTFCBGA592. Memory support: 4 GB. Passmark benchmark score: 2,979 points. Launch price was $69.

FX-4300

The FX-4300 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 23 October 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Vishera (2012−2015) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.8 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L2 cache: 4096 kB. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: AM3+. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,995 points. Launch price was $122.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Atom x5-Z8350 and FX-4300 share an identical 4-core/4-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 1.92 GHz on the Atom x5-Z8350 versus 4 GHz on the FX-4300 — a 70.3% clock advantage for the FX-4300 (base: 1.44 GHz vs 3.8 GHz). The Atom x5-Z8350 uses the Cherry Trail (2015−2016) architecture (14 nm), while the FX-4300 uses Vishera (2012−2015) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Atom x5-Z8350 scores 2,979 against the FX-4300's 2,995 — a 0.5% lead for the FX-4300.

Feature	Atom x5-Z8350	FX-4300
Cores / Threads	4 / 4	4 / 4
Boost Clock	1.92 GHz	4 GHz+108%
Base Clock	1.44 GHz	3.8 GHz+164%
L3 Cache	0 kB	—
L2 Cache	2 MB	4096 kB+100%
Process	14 nm-56%	32 nm
Architecture	Cherry Trail (2015−2016)	Vishera (2012−2015)
PassMark	2,979	2,995

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Atom x5-Z8350 uses the UTFCBGA592 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the FX-4300 uses AM3+ (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Atom x5-Z8350	FX-4300
Socket	UTFCBGA592	AM3+
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0+50%	PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR3L-RS 1600	—
Max RAM Capacity	2 GB	—
RAM Channels	1	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	1	—