Atom x5-Z8350 vs Pentium Silver N6000

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Atom x5-Z8350 vs Pentium Silver N6000 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Atom x5-Z8350 vs Pentium Silver N6000: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Atom x5-Z8350

2016

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +4.2% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (2,979 vs 2,989).

Pentium Silver N6000

2021

Why buy it

✅+0.3% higher PassMark.
✅700% more PCIe lanes (8 vs 1) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Atom x5-Z8350 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.

Quick Answers

So, is Pentium Silver N6000 better than Atom x5-Z8350?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Atom x5-Z8350 is ahead with a 4.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Pentium Silver N6000 pulls ahead with 0.3% better PassMark.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Pentium Silver N6000 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.3% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Pentium Silver N6000 still makes the most sense overall. Pentium Silver N6000 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you 0.3% better PassMark.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Pentium Silver N6000 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2021 vs 2016) and more multi-core headroom with 4 cores / 4 threads instead of 4/4. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Atom x5-Z8350 vs Pentium Silver N6000 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Atom x5-Z8350

The Atom x5-Z8350 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 8 February 2016 (9 years ago). It is based on the Cherry Trail (2015−2016) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.44 GHz, with boost up to 1.92 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: UTFCBGA592. Memory support: 4 GB. Passmark benchmark score: 2,979 points. Launch price was $69.

Pentium Silver N6000

The Pentium Silver N6000 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Jasper Lake (2021) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.3 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.5 MB (total). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1338. Thermal design power (TDP): 6 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 2,989 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Atom x5-Z8350 and Pentium Silver N6000 share an identical 4-core/4-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 1.92 GHz on the Atom x5-Z8350 versus 3.3 GHz on the Pentium Silver N6000 — a 52.9% clock advantage for the Pentium Silver N6000 (base: 1.44 GHz vs 1.1 GHz). The Atom x5-Z8350 uses the Cherry Trail (2015−2016) architecture (14 nm), while the Pentium Silver N6000 uses Jasper Lake (2021) (10 nm). In PassMark, the Atom x5-Z8350 scores 2,979 against the Pentium Silver N6000's 2,989 — a 0.3% lead for the Pentium Silver N6000. L3 cache: 0 kB on the Atom x5-Z8350 vs 4 MB (total) on the Pentium Silver N6000.

Feature	Atom x5-Z8350	Pentium Silver N6000
Cores / Threads	4 / 4	4 / 4
Boost Clock	1.92 GHz	3.3 GHz+72%
Base Clock	1.44 GHz+31%	1.1 GHz
L3 Cache	0 kB	4 MB (total)
L2 Cache	2 MB+33%	1.5 MB (total)
Process	14 nm	10 nm-29%
Architecture	Cherry Trail (2015−2016)	Jasper Lake (2021)
PassMark	2,979	2,989
Cinebench R23 Multi	—	1,911
Geekbench 6 Single	—	473
Geekbench 6 Multi	—	1,090

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Atom x5-Z8350 uses the UTFCBGA592 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Pentium Silver N6000 uses BGA1338 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3L-RS 1600 on the Atom x5-Z8350 versus DDR4-2933 on the Pentium Silver N6000 — the Pentium Silver N6000 supports 83.3% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Pentium Silver N6000 supports up to 16 GB of RAM compared to 2 GB — 700% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 1 (Atom x5-Z8350) vs 2 (Pentium Silver N6000). PCIe lanes: 1 (Atom x5-Z8350) vs 8 (Pentium Silver N6000) — the Pentium Silver N6000 offers 7 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: Intel FC-UTBGA592 (Atom x5-Z8350) and SoC (Pentium Silver N6000).

Feature	Atom x5-Z8350	Pentium Silver N6000
Socket	UTFCBGA592	BGA1338
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 4.0+33%
Max RAM Speed	DDR3L-RS 1600	DDR4-2933+83%
Max RAM Capacity	2 GB	16 GB+700%
RAM Channels	1	2+100%
ECC Support	No	No
PCIe Lanes	1	8+700%

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Atom x5-Z8350) / VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Pentium Silver N6000). Both include integrated graphics — Intel HD Graphics (Cherry Trail) (Atom x5-Z8350) and UHD Graphics (32 EU) (Pentium Silver N6000) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Pentium Silver N6000 targets Budget. Direct competitor: Pentium Silver N6000 rivals Celeron N5105.

Feature	Atom x5-Z8350	Pentium Silver N6000
Integrated GPU	Yes	Yes
IGPU Model	Intel HD Graphics (Cherry Trail)	UHD Graphics (32 EU)
Unlocked	—	No
AVX-512	—	No
Virtualization	—	VT-x, VT-d, EPT
Target Use	—	Budget