Atom x5-Z8500 vs Turion II Neo K625

Atom x5-Z8500 vs Turion II Neo K625 Performance Spectrum

Atom x5-Z8500

4 / 4

1,242

+0.1%

1,241

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Atom x5-Z8500 vs Turion II Neo K625 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Atom x5-Z8500 vs Turion II Neo K625: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Atom x5-Z8500

2015

Why buy it

✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel HD Graphics (Cherry Trail), while Turion II Neo K625 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.

Turion II Neo K625

2010

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,241 vs 1,242).
❌No integrated graphics, while Atom x5-Z8500 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Atom x5-Z8500 better than Turion II Neo K625?

Yes. Atom x5-Z8500 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 0.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 0.1% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Atom x5-Z8500 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 0.1% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Atom x5-Z8500 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.1% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Atom x5-Z8500 still makes the most sense overall. Atom x5-Z8500 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 0.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Atom x5-Z8500 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2015 vs 2010) and more multi-core headroom with 4 cores / 4 threads instead of 2/2. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Atom x5-Z8500 vs Turion II Neo K625 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Atom x5-Z8500

The Atom x5-Z8500 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2 March 2015 (10 years ago). It is based on the Cherry Trail (2015−2016) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.44 GHz, with boost up to 2.24 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: UTFCBGA1380. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,242 points. Launch price was $69.

Turion II Neo K625

The Turion II Neo K625 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Geneva (2010) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 1.5 GHz. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: S1. Thermal design power (TDP): 1 MB. Passmark benchmark score: 1,241 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

The Atom x5-Z8500 packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Turion II Neo K625 offers 2 cores / 2 threads — the Atom x5-Z8500 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2.24 GHz on the Atom x5-Z8500 versus 1.5 GHz on the Turion II Neo K625 — a 39.6% clock advantage for the Atom x5-Z8500. The Atom x5-Z8500 uses the Cherry Trail (2015−2016) architecture (14 nm), while the Turion II Neo K625 uses Geneva (2010) (45 nm). In PassMark, the Atom x5-Z8500 scores 1,242 against the Turion II Neo K625's 1,241 — a 0.1% lead for the Atom x5-Z8500.

Feature	Atom x5-Z8500	Turion II Neo K625
Cores / Threads	4 / 4+100%	2 / 2
Boost Clock	2.24 GHz+49%	1.5 GHz
Base Clock	1.44 GHz	—
L3 Cache	0 kB	—
L2 Cache	2 MB+100%	1 MB
Process	14 nm-69%	45 nm
Architecture	Cherry Trail (2015−2016)	Geneva (2010)
PassMark	1,242	1,241

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Atom x5-Z8500 uses the UTFCBGA1380 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Turion II Neo K625 uses S1 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Atom x5-Z8500	Turion II Neo K625
Socket	UTFCBGA1380	S1
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0+50%	PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed	LPDDR3-1600	—
Max RAM Capacity	8 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	2	—