Atom x7211E
VS
Celeron G4930

Atom x7211E vs Celeron G4930

Intel

Atom x7211E

2 Cores2 Thrd6 WWMax: 3.2 GHz2023
VS
Intel

Celeron G4930

2 Cores2 Thrd54 WWMax: 3.2 GHz2019

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. The Atom x7211E is positioned at rank #240 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Atom x7211E

#64
Ryzen AI Max PRO 390
MSRP: $600|Avg: $600
99%
#228
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
402%
#229
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
396%
#230
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
364%
#231
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
362%
#232
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
359%
#234
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
347%
#235
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
332%
#236
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
332%
#237
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
323%
#240
Atom x7211E
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Celeron G4930

#343
Athlon Gold PRO 3150G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $150
111%
#344
Core i9-9900
MSRP: $423|Avg: $330
110%
#345
Core i9-9980XE
MSRP: $1979|Avg: $593
110%
#346
Core i7-10700K
MSRP: $387|Avg: $380
109%
#347
Celeron G5905T
MSRP: $50|Avg: $50
105%
#348
Athlon PRO 200GE
MSRP: $55|Avg: $81
105%
#349
Core i5-9600
MSRP: $224|Avg: $219
105%
#350
Core i3-8300
MSRP: $138|Avg: $136
105%
#351
Core i5-8500B
MSRP: $192|Avg: $192
104%
#352
Core i7-13700TE
MSRP: $390|Avg: $476
103%
#353
Core i9-11900T
MSRP: $439|Avg: $413
101%
#354
Ryzen Threadripper 7970X
MSRP: $2499|Avg: $2200
101%
#355
Core i9-10900
MSRP: $483|Avg: $426
101%
#356
Ryzen Embedded V1605B
MSRP: $150|Avg: $150
100%
#357
Core i9-10900K
MSRP: $499|Avg: $500
100%
#358
Celeron G4930
MSRP: $42|Avg: $57
100%
#359
Ryzen 7 2700E
MSRP: $329|Avg: $329
100%
#360
Ryzen Embedded V2516
MSRP: $300|Avg: $300
99%
#361
Ryzen Threadripper 9970X
MSRP: $2499|Avg: $2442
99%
#362
Core i9-14901E
MSRP: $557|Avg: $689
98%
#363
Celeron G5900T
MSRP: $42|Avg: $50
98%
#364
Celeron G6900TE
MSRP: $53|Avg: $64
97%
#365
Core i5-8600T
MSRP: $213|Avg: $213
97%
#366
Celeron G4950
MSRP: $52|Avg: $63
96%
#367
Core i9-10900E
MSRP: $488|Avg: $450
96%
#368
Core i7-9700KF
MSRP: $374|Avg: $333
96%
#369
Core i5-8400T
MSRP: $182|Avg: $179
93%
#370
Athlon 240GE
MSRP: $75|Avg: $110
93%
#371
Core 5 120UL
MSRP: $277|Avg: $270
87%
#372
Ryzen Embedded V3C14
MSRP: $305|Avg: $305
87%
#373
Core i7-9700T
MSRP: $323|Avg: $276
86%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Analysis: Based on specifications, the Atom x7211E shows stronger theoretical performance metrics.
InsightAtom x7211ECeleron G4930
Gaming
Balanced gaming performance
Balanced gaming performance
Workstation
Better multi-core power
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($57)
Longevity
✨ Modern (Gracemont (2023) / 10 nm)
✨ Modern (Coffee Lake (2017−2019) / 14 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

InsightAtom x7211ECeleron G4930
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($57)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Atom x7211E and Celeron G4930

Intel

Atom x7211E

The Atom x7211E is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Gracemont (2023) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (total). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1744. Thermal design power (TDP): 6 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5 4800 MHz Single-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 2,553 points. Launch price was $69.

Intel

Celeron G4930

The Celeron G4930 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 23 April 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Coffee Lake (2017−2019) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 54 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2400. Passmark benchmark score: 2,551 points. Launch price was $42.

Processing Power

Both the Atom x7211E and Celeron G4930 share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3.2 GHz on the Atom x7211E versus 3.2 GHz on the Celeron G4930 — identical boost frequencies (base: 1 GHz vs 3.2 GHz). The Atom x7211E uses the Gracemont (2023) architecture (10 nm), while the Celeron G4930 uses Coffee Lake (2017−2019) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Atom x7211E scores 2,553 against the Celeron G4930's 2,551 — a 0.1% lead for the Atom x7211E. L3 cache: 6 MB (total) on the Atom x7211E vs 2 MB on the Celeron G4930.

FeatureAtom x7211ECeleron G4930
Cores / Threads
2 / 2
2 / 2
Boost Clock
3.2 GHz
3.2 GHz
Base Clock
1 GHz
3.2 GHz+220%
L3 Cache
6 MB (total)+200%
2 MB
L2 Cache
2 MB (total)+300%
512 kB
Process
10 nm-29%
14 nm
Architecture
Gracemont (2023)
Coffee Lake (2017−2019)
PassMark
2,553
2,551
Geekbench 6 Single
672
Geekbench 6 Multi
1,229
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Atom x7211E uses the FCBGA1744 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Celeron G4930 uses LGA1151 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-4800 on the Atom x7211E versus DDR4-2400 on the Celeron G4930 — the Atom x7211E supports 22.2% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Celeron G4930 supports up to 64 GB of RAM compared to 16 GB 120% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 1 (Atom x7211E) vs 2 (Celeron G4930). PCIe lanes: 9 (Atom x7211E) vs 16 (Celeron G4930) — the Celeron G4930 offers 7 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: Intel BGA1264 (Atom x7211E) and H310,B360,B365,H370,Z370,Z390 (Celeron G4930).

FeatureAtom x7211ECeleron G4930
Socket
FCBGA1744
LGA1151
PCIe Generation
PCIe 4.0+33%
PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR5-4800+25%
DDR4-2400
Max RAM Capacity
16 GB
64 GB+300%
RAM Channels
1
2+100%
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
9
16+78%
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Atom x7211E) / VT-x (Celeron G4930). Both include integrated graphics Intel UHD Graphics (16EU) (Atom x7211E) and UHD Graphics 610 (Celeron G4930) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron G4930 targets Budget. Direct competitor: Celeron G4930 rivals Pentium G5420.

FeatureAtom x7211ECeleron G4930
Integrated GPU
Yes
Yes
IGPU Model
Intel UHD Graphics (16EU)
UHD Graphics 610
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
VT-x
Target Use
Budget