Atom x7211E vs Celeron G4930

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Atom x7211E vs Celeron G4930 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Atom x7211E vs Celeron G4930: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Atom x7211E

2023

Why buy it

✅+0.1% higher PassMark.
✅+200% larger total L3 cache (6 MB vs 2 MB).
✅Draws 6W instead of 54W, a 48W reduction.
✅Newer platform on FCBGA1744 with DDR5 support instead of LGA1151 and DDR4.

Trade-offs

❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.

Celeron G4930

2019

Why buy it

✅77.8% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 9) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (2,551 vs 2,553).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (2 MB vs 6 MB).
❌Launch MSRP is still $42 MSRP, while Atom x7211E mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌800% higher power demand at 54W vs 6W.
❌Older platform position on LGA1151 with DDR4, while Atom x7211E moves to FCBGA1744 and DDR5.

Quick Answers

So, is Atom x7211E better than Celeron G4930?

Yes. Atom x7211E is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 0.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 0.1% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

For gaming, this matchup is basically a tie in the data we have.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Atom x7211E is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.1% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 200% larger total L3 cache (6 MB vs 2 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Atom x7211E is still the better call for a fresh build. Atom x7211E comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $42 MSRP, and it still gives you a 0.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Celeron G4930 only looks stronger on raw value math because it is so cheap, but its absolute performance tier is too low to be the better recommendation now. At roughly 2,551 PassMark with 2 cores and 2 threads, it only really makes sense as a bare-minimum stopgap or a very constrained existing-platform upgrade.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Atom x7211E makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2023 vs 2019), a healthier platform with FCBGA1744 and DDR5 instead of LGA1151, 200% larger total L3 cache (6 MB vs 2 MB), and more multi-core headroom with 2 cores / 2 threads instead of 2/2. That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

Atom x7211E vs Celeron G4930 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Atom x7211E

The Atom x7211E is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Gracemont (2023) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (total). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1744. Thermal design power (TDP): 6 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5 4800 MHz Single-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 2,553 points. Launch price was $69.

Celeron G4930

The Celeron G4930 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 23 April 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Coffee Lake (2017−2019) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 54 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2400. Passmark benchmark score: 2,551 points. Launch price was $42.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Atom x7211E and Celeron G4930 share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3.2 GHz on the Atom x7211E versus 3.2 GHz on the Celeron G4930 — identical boost frequencies (base: 1 GHz vs 3.2 GHz). The Atom x7211E uses the Gracemont (2023) architecture (10 nm), while the Celeron G4930 uses Coffee Lake (2017−2019) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Atom x7211E scores 2,553 against the Celeron G4930's 2,551 — a 0.1% lead for the Atom x7211E. L3 cache: 6 MB (total) on the Atom x7211E vs 2 MB on the Celeron G4930.

Feature	Atom x7211E	Celeron G4930
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	2 / 2
Boost Clock	3.2 GHz	3.2 GHz
Base Clock	1 GHz	3.2 GHz+220%
L3 Cache	6 MB (total)+200%	2 MB
L2 Cache	2 MB (total)+300%	512 kB
Process	10 nm-29%	14 nm
Architecture	Gracemont (2023)	Coffee Lake (2017−2019)
PassMark	2,553	2,551
Geekbench 6 Single	—	672
Geekbench 6 Multi	—	1,229

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Atom x7211E uses the FCBGA1744 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Celeron G4930 uses LGA1151 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-4800 on the Atom x7211E versus DDR4-2400 on the Celeron G4930 — the Atom x7211E supports 100% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Celeron G4930 supports up to 64 GB of RAM compared to 16 GB — 300% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 1 (Atom x7211E) vs 2 (Celeron G4930). PCIe lanes: 9 (Atom x7211E) vs 16 (Celeron G4930) — the Celeron G4930 offers 7 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: Intel BGA1264 (Atom x7211E) and H310,B360,B365,H370,Z370,Z390 (Celeron G4930).

Feature	Atom x7211E	Celeron G4930
Socket	FCBGA1744	LGA1151
PCIe Generation	PCIe 4.0+33%	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR5-4800+100%	DDR4-2400
Max RAM Capacity	16 GB	64 GB+300%
RAM Channels	1	2+100%
ECC Support	No	Yes
PCIe Lanes	9	16+78%

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Atom x7211E) / VT-x (Celeron G4930). Both include integrated graphics — Intel UHD Graphics (16EU) (Atom x7211E) and UHD Graphics 610 (Celeron G4930) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron G4930 targets Budget. Direct competitor: Celeron G4930 rivals Pentium G5420.