Atom x7211E
VS
Core i5-750

Atom x7211E vs Core i5-750

Intel

Atom x7211E

2 Cores2 Thrd6 WWMax: 3.2 GHz2023
VS
Intel

Core i5-750

4 Cores4 Thrd95 WWMax: 3.2 GHz2009

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Atom x7211E is positioned at rank 240 and the Core i5-750 is on rank 960, so the Atom x7211E offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Atom x7211E

#64
Ryzen AI Max PRO 390
MSRP: $600|Avg: $600
99%
#228
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
402%
#229
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
396%
#230
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
364%
#231
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
362%
#232
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
359%
#234
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
347%
#235
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
332%
#236
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
332%
#237
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
323%
#240
Atom x7211E
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Core i5-750

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
25719%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
24302%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
17645%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
5316%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
4211%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
3683%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
2110%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
2082%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
1896%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
1896%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
1875%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
1824%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
1798%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
1791%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
1775%
#959
Core i3-4150
MSRP: $281|Avg: $70
100%
#960
Core i5-750
MSRP: $210|Avg: $30
100%
#961
Core i3-2100T
MSRP: $127|Avg: $127
100%
#962
Pentium E2210
MSRP: $84|Avg: $15
99%
#963
Core i3-560
MSRP: $138|Avg: $10
98%
#964
Core i3-550
MSRP: $138|Avg: $5
98%
#965
Core i7-980
MSRP: $583|Avg: $50
98%
#966
Pentium G3250
MSRP: $171|Avg: $25
97%
#967
Pentium E2200
MSRP: $84|Avg: $5
97%
#968
Core 2 Duo E7300
MSRP: $133|Avg: $133
96%
#969
Core i3-540
MSRP: $133|Avg: $5
96%
#971
Phenom II X3 700e
MSRP: $125|Avg: $40
96%
#972
Core i5-760
MSRP: $230|Avg: $61
96%
#973
Core i3-7102E
MSRP: $225|Avg: $80
95%
#974
Core 2 Quad Q8400
MSRP: $183|Avg: $128
94%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Generational Difference: This comparison involves processors from different technological eras. The Atom x7211E (2023) utilizes 10 nm technology and **DDR4, DDR5 4800 MHz Single-channel**, providing a fundamental performance advantage.
InsightAtom x7211ECore i5-750
Gaming
Balanced gaming performance
Balanced gaming performance
Workstation
Better multi-core power
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($30)
Longevity
✨ Modern (Gracemont (2023) / 10 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Lynnfield (2009−2010) / 45 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Core i5-750 (2009) relies on 45 nm technology and DDR3, placing it in a different performance category relative to modern standards.
InsightAtom x7211ECore i5-750
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($30)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Atom x7211E and Core i5-750

Intel

Atom x7211E

The Atom x7211E is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Gracemont (2023) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (total). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1744. Thermal design power (TDP): 6 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5 4800 MHz Single-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 2,553 points. Launch price was $69.

Intel

Core i5-750

The Core i5-750 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 8 September 2009 (16 years ago). It is based on the Lynnfield (2009−2010) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.66 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1156. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,546 points. Launch price was $150.

Processing Power

The Atom x7211E packs 2 cores / 2 threads, while the Core i5-750 offers 4 cores / 4 threads — the Core i5-750 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.2 GHz on the Atom x7211E versus 3.2 GHz on the Core i5-750 — identical boost frequencies (base: 1 GHz vs 2.66 GHz). The Atom x7211E uses the Gracemont (2023) architecture (10 nm), while the Core i5-750 uses Lynnfield (2009−2010) (45 nm). In PassMark, the Atom x7211E scores 2,553 against the Core i5-750's 2,546 — a 0.3% lead for the Atom x7211E. L3 cache: 6 MB (total) on the Atom x7211E vs 8 MB (total) on the Core i5-750.

FeatureAtom x7211ECore i5-750
Cores / Threads
2 / 2
4 / 4+100%
Boost Clock
3.2 GHz
3.2 GHz
Base Clock
1 GHz
2.66 GHz+166%
L3 Cache
6 MB (total)
8 MB (total)+33%
L2 Cache
2 MB (total)+700%
256 kB (per core)
Process
10 nm-78%
45 nm
Architecture
Gracemont (2023)
Lynnfield (2009−2010)
PassMark
2,553
2,546
Geekbench 6 Single
424
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Atom x7211E uses the FCBGA1744 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Core i5-750 uses LGA1156 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-4800 on the Atom x7211E versus DDR3-1333 on the Core i5-750 — the Atom x7211E supports 50% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 16 GB of RAM. Memory channels: 1 (Atom x7211E) vs 2 (Core i5-750). PCIe lanes: 9 (Atom x7211E) vs 16 (Core i5-750) — the Core i5-750 offers 7 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: Intel BGA1264 (Atom x7211E) and P55,H55,H57,Q57 (Core i5-750).

FeatureAtom x7211ECore i5-750
Socket
FCBGA1744
LGA1156
PCIe Generation
PCIe 4.0+100%
PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR5-4800+67%
DDR3-1333
Max RAM Capacity
16 GB
16 GB
RAM Channels
1
2+100%
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
9
16+78%
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Atom x7211E) / VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i5-750). The Atom x7211E includes integrated graphics (Intel UHD Graphics (16EU)), while the Core i5-750 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-750 targets Legacy Desktop. Direct competitor: Core i5-750 rivals Phenom II X4 965.

FeatureAtom x7211ECore i5-750
Integrated GPU
Yes
No
IGPU Model
Intel UHD Graphics (16EU)
None
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d, EPT
Target Use
Legacy Desktop