
Atom x7211E

Core i5-750
Atom x7211E vs Core i5-750 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Atom x7211E vs Core i5-750 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Atom x7211E vs Core i5-750: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Atom x7211E
2023Why buy it
- ✅+0.3% higher PassMark.
- ✅Draws 6W instead of 95W, a 89W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on FCBGA1744 with DDR5 support instead of LGA1156 and older memory support.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel UHD Graphics (16EU), while Core i5-750 needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (6 MB vs 8 MB).
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-750.
Core i5-750
2009Why buy it
- ✅+33.3% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 6 MB).
- ✅77.8% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 9) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Atom x7211E.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (2,546 vs 2,553).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $210 MSRP, while Atom x7211E mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌1483.3% higher power demand at 95W vs 6W.
- ❌Older platform position on LGA1156, while Atom x7211E moves to FCBGA1744 and DDR5.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Atom x7211E can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is Atom x7211E better than Core i5-750?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Atom x7211E vs Core i5-750 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Atom x7211E
The Atom x7211E is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Gracemont (2023) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (total). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1744. Thermal design power (TDP): 6 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5 4800 MHz Single-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 2,553 points. Launch price was $69.

Core i5-750
The Core i5-750 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 8 September 2009 (16 years ago). It is based on the Lynnfield (2009−2010) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.66 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1156. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,546 points. Launch price was $150.
Processing Power
The Atom x7211E packs 2 cores / 2 threads, while the Core i5-750 offers 4 cores / 4 threads — the Core i5-750 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.2 GHz on the Atom x7211E versus 3.2 GHz on the Core i5-750 — identical boost frequencies (base: 1 GHz vs 2.66 GHz). The Atom x7211E uses the Gracemont (2023) architecture (10 nm), while the Core i5-750 uses Lynnfield (2009−2010) (45 nm). In PassMark, the Atom x7211E scores 2,553 against the Core i5-750's 2,546 — a 0.3% lead for the Atom x7211E. L3 cache: 6 MB (total) on the Atom x7211E vs 8 MB (total) on the Core i5-750.
| Feature | Atom x7211E | Core i5-750 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 2 / 2 | 4 / 4+100% |
| Boost Clock | 3.2 GHz | 3.2 GHz |
| Base Clock | 1 GHz | 2.66 GHz+166% |
| L3 Cache | 6 MB (total) | 8 MB (total)+33% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB (total)+700% | 256 kB (per core) |
| Process | 10 nm-78% | 45 nm |
| Architecture | Gracemont (2023) | Lynnfield (2009−2010) |
| PassMark | 2,553 | 2,546 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 424 |
Memory & Platform
The Atom x7211E uses the FCBGA1744 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Core i5-750 uses LGA1156 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-4800 on the Atom x7211E versus DDR3-1333 on the Core i5-750 — the Atom x7211E supports 260.1% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 16 GB of RAM. Memory channels: 1 (Atom x7211E) vs 2 (Core i5-750). PCIe lanes: 9 (Atom x7211E) vs 16 (Core i5-750) — the Core i5-750 offers 7 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: Intel BGA1264 (Atom x7211E) and P55,H55,H57,Q57 (Core i5-750).
| Feature | Atom x7211E | Core i5-750 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FCBGA1744 | LGA1156 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0+100% | PCIe 2.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-4800+260% | DDR3-1333 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 16 GB | 16 GB |
| RAM Channels | 1 | 2+100% |
| ECC Support | No | No |
| PCIe Lanes | 9 | 16+78% |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: not specified (Atom x7211E) / VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i5-750). The Atom x7211E includes integrated graphics (Intel UHD Graphics (16EU)), while the Core i5-750 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-750 targets Legacy Desktop. Direct competitor: Core i5-750 rivals Phenom II X4 965.
| Feature | Atom x7211E | Core i5-750 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | No |
| IGPU Model | Intel UHD Graphics (16EU) | None |
| Unlocked | — | No |
| AVX-512 | — | No |
| Virtualization | — | VT-x, VT-d, EPT |
| Target Use | — | Legacy Desktop |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.













