Atom x7809C vs Core i3-10300

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Atom x7809C vs Core i3-10300 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Atom x7809C vs Core i3-10300: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Atom x7809C

2024

Why buy it

✅+1.3% higher PassMark.
✅Draws 25W instead of 62W, a 37W reduction.
✅Newer platform on FCBGA1264 with DDR5 support instead of LGA1200 and DDR4.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (9 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i3-10300 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Smaller total L3 cache (6 MB vs 8 MB).

Core i3-10300

2020

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +14.1% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+33.3% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 6 MB).

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (9,290 vs 9,409).
❌148% higher power demand at 62W vs 25W.
❌Older platform position on LGA1200 with DDR4, while Atom x7809C moves to FCBGA1264 and DDR5.

Quick Answers

So, is Atom x7809C better than Core i3-10300?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Core i3-10300 is ahead with a 14.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Atom x7809C pulls ahead with 1.3% better PassMark. Core i3-10300 also has the bigger cache pool with 33.3% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 6 MB).

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Atom x7809C is the stronger fit. You are getting 1.3% better PassMark, backed by 8 cores and 8 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Atom x7809C still makes the most sense overall. Atom x7809C comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you 1.3% better PassMark.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Atom x7809C makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2024 vs 2020), a healthier platform with FCBGA1264 and DDR5 instead of LGA1200, and more multi-core headroom with 8 cores / 8 threads instead of 4/8. That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

Atom x7809C vs Core i3-10300 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Atom x7809C

The Atom x7809C is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 8 April 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Amston Lake (2024−2025) architecture. It features 8 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 3.6 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per module). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1264. Thermal design power (TDP): 25 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 9,409 points. Launch price was $117.

Core i3-10300

The Core i3-10300 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 30 April 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Comet Lake (2020−2025) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.7 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2666. Passmark benchmark score: 9,290 points. Launch price was $149.

⚡

Processing Power

The Atom x7809C packs 8 cores / 8 threads, while the Core i3-10300 offers 4 cores / 8 threads — the Atom x7809C has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.6 GHz on the Atom x7809C versus 4.4 GHz on the Core i3-10300 — a 20% clock advantage for the Core i3-10300 (base: 2 GHz vs 3.7 GHz). The Atom x7809C uses the Amston Lake (2024−2025) architecture (10 nm), while the Core i3-10300 uses Comet Lake (2020−2025) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Atom x7809C scores 9,409 against the Core i3-10300's 9,290 — a 1.3% lead for the Atom x7809C. L3 cache: 6 MB (total) on the Atom x7809C vs 8 MB (total) on the Core i3-10300.

Feature	Atom x7809C	Core i3-10300
Cores / Threads	8 / 8+100%	4 / 8
Boost Clock	3.6 GHz	4.4 GHz+22%
Base Clock	2 GHz	3.7 GHz+85%
L3 Cache	6 MB (total)	8 MB (total)+33%
L2 Cache	2 MB (per module)	256K (per core)+12700%
Process	10 nm-29%	14 nm
Architecture	Amston Lake (2024−2025)	Comet Lake (2020−2025)
PassMark	9,409+1%	9,290
Geekbench 6 Single	1,102	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	4,657	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Atom x7809C uses the FCBGA1264 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Core i3-10300 uses LGA1200 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Atom x7809C	Core i3-10300
Socket	FCBGA1264	LGA1200
PCIe Generation	PCIe 4.0+33%	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR5-4800	—
Max RAM Capacity	32 GB	—
RAM Channels	1	—
ECC Support	Yes	—
PCIe Lanes	9	—