Atom Z2760
VS
A4-4355M

Atom Z2760 vs A4-4355M

Intel

Atom Z2760

2 Cores4 Thrd3 WWMax: 1.8 GHz2012
VS
AMD

A4-4355M

2 Cores2 Thrd17 WWMax: 2.4 GHz2012

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Atom Z2760 is positioned at rank 529 and the A4-4355M is on rank 730, so the Atom Z2760 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Atom Z2760

#167
Core Ultra 7 258V
MSRP: $450|Avg: $400
99%
#169
Core i7-1280P
MSRP: $482|Avg: $482
98%
#517
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
691%
#518
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
681%
#519
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
626%
#520
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
623%
#521
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
617%
#523
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
596%
#524
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
571%
#525
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
570%
#526
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
555%
#529
Atom Z2760
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar A4-4355M

#718
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
1042%
#719
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
1026%
#720
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
942%
#721
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
938%
#722
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
929%
#724
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
897%
#725
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
860%
#726
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
859%
#727
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
836%
#730
A4-4355M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#744
Pentium 6805
MSRP: $161|Avg: $161
98%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Trade-off: The A4-4355M leads in gaming performance. However, the Atom Z2760 is the stronger candidate for professional workloads, offering 0.4% greater multi-core processing power.
InsightAtom Z2760A4-4355M
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Better multi-core power
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Cloverview (2012) / 32 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Trinity (2012−2013) / 32 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

InsightAtom Z2760A4-4355M
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Atom Z2760 and A4-4355M

Intel

Atom Z2760

The Atom Z2760 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 27 September 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Cloverview (2012) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.8 GHz, with boost up to 1.8 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: FC-MB4760. Thermal design power (TDP): 3 Watt. Memory support: DDR2. Passmark benchmark score: 1,697 points. Launch price was $69.

AMD

A4-4355M

The A4-4355M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Trinity (2012−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.9 GHz, with boost up to 2.4 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB (total). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: FP2. Thermal design power (TDP): 17 Watt. Memory support: unknown Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 1,690 points. Launch price was $50.

Processing Power

The Atom Z2760 packs 2 cores / 4 threads, matching the A4-4355M's 2 cores. Boost clocks reach 1.8 GHz on the Atom Z2760 versus 2.4 GHz on the A4-4355M — a 28.6% clock advantage for the A4-4355M (base: 1.8 GHz vs 1.9 GHz). The Atom Z2760 uses the Cloverview (2012) architecture (32 nm), while the A4-4355M uses Trinity (2012−2013) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Atom Z2760 scores 1,697 against the A4-4355M's 1,690 — a 0.4% lead for the Atom Z2760. Both processors carry 0 kB of L3 cache.

FeatureAtom Z2760A4-4355M
Cores / Threads
2 / 4
2 / 2
Boost Clock
1.8 GHz
2.4 GHz+33%
Base Clock
1.8 GHz
1.9 GHz+6%
L3 Cache
0 kB
0 kB
L2 Cache
512K (per core)
1 MB (total)+100%
Process
32 nm
32 nm
Architecture
Cloverview (2012)
Trinity (2012−2013)
PassMark
1,697
1,690
Geekbench 6 Single
239
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Atom Z2760 uses the FC-MB4760 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the A4-4355M uses FP2 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches LPDDR2-800 on the Atom Z2760 versus DDR3-1333 on the A4-4355M — the A4-4355M supports 40% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The A4-4355M supports up to 16 GB of RAM compared to 2 GB 155.6% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 0 (Atom Z2760) vs 16 (A4-4355M) — the A4-4355M offers 16 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives.

FeatureAtom Z2760A4-4355M
Socket
FC-MB4760
FP2
PCIe Generation
PCIe 2.0
PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed
LPDDR2-800
DDR3-1333+50%
Max RAM Capacity
2 GB
16 GB+700%
RAM Channels
2
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
0
16
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Atom Z2760) / AMD-V (A4-4355M). Both include integrated graphics Intel GMA 3650 (Atom Z2760) and Radeon HD 7400G (A4-4355M) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: A4-4355M targets Ultrathin Laptop. Direct competitor: A4-4355M rivals Pentium 2117U.

FeatureAtom Z2760A4-4355M
Integrated GPU
Yes
Yes
IGPU Model
Intel GMA 3650
Radeon HD 7400G
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
AMD-V
Target Use
Ultrathin Laptop