Atom Z2760
VS
Turion X2 RM-75

Atom Z2760 vs Turion X2 RM-75

Intel

Atom Z2760

2 Cores4 Thrd3 WWMax: 1.8 GHz2012
VS
AMD

Turion X2 RM-75

2 Cores2 Thrd1 WWMax: 2.2 GHz2009

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Atom Z2760 is positioned at rank 529 and the Turion X2 RM-75 is on rank 366, so the Turion X2 RM-75 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Atom Z2760

#167
Core Ultra 7 258V
MSRP: $450|Avg: $400
99%
#169
Core i7-1280P
MSRP: $482|Avg: $482
98%
#517
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
691%
#518
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
681%
#519
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
626%
#520
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
623%
#521
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
617%
#523
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
596%
#524
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
571%
#525
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
570%
#526
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
555%
#529
Atom Z2760
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Turion X2 RM-75

#111
Ryzen 5 PRO 5675U
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $180
99%
#354
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
513%
#355
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
505%
#356
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
464%
#357
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
462%
#358
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
457%
#360
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
442%
#361
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
424%
#362
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
423%
#363
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
411%
#366
Turion X2 RM-75
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#375
Pentium Dual Core T3200
MSRP: $64|Avg: $5
98%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Leadership: The Turion X2 RM-75 delivers superior performance across the board. It outperforms the Atom Z2760 in both compute-intensive tasks (1.2% faster) and gaming workloads.
InsightAtom Z2760Turion X2 RM-75
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Cloverview (2012) / 32 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Lion (2008−2009) / 65 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

InsightAtom Z2760Turion X2 RM-75
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Atom Z2760 and Turion X2 RM-75

Intel

Atom Z2760

The Atom Z2760 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 27 September 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Cloverview (2012) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.8 GHz, with boost up to 1.8 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: FC-MB4760. Thermal design power (TDP): 3 Watt. Memory support: DDR2. Passmark benchmark score: 1,697 points. Launch price was $69.

AMD

Turion X2 RM-75

The Turion X2 RM-75 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Lion (2008−2009) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 2.2 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: S1. Thermal design power (TDP): 1 MB. Passmark benchmark score: 1,717 points. Launch price was $69.

Processing Power

The Atom Z2760 packs 2 cores / 4 threads, matching the Turion X2 RM-75's 2 cores. Boost clocks reach 1.8 GHz on the Atom Z2760 versus 2.2 GHz on the Turion X2 RM-75 — a 20% clock advantage for the Turion X2 RM-75. The Atom Z2760 uses the Cloverview (2012) architecture (32 nm), while the Turion X2 RM-75 uses Lion (2008−2009) (65 nm). In PassMark, the Atom Z2760 scores 1,697 against the Turion X2 RM-75's 1,717 — a 1.2% lead for the Turion X2 RM-75. Both processors carry 0 kB of L3 cache.

FeatureAtom Z2760Turion X2 RM-75
Cores / Threads
2 / 4
2 / 2
Boost Clock
1.8 GHz
2.2 GHz+22%
Base Clock
1.8 GHz
L3 Cache
0 kB
0 kB
L2 Cache
512K (per core)
1 MB+100%
Process
32 nm-51%
65 nm
Architecture
Cloverview (2012)
Lion (2008−2009)
PassMark
1,697
1,717+1%
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Atom Z2760 uses the FC-MB4760 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Turion X2 RM-75 uses S1 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureAtom Z2760Turion X2 RM-75
Socket
FC-MB4760
S1
PCIe Generation
PCIe 2.0
PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed
LPDDR2-800
Max RAM Capacity
2 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
0
🔧

Advanced Features

The Atom Z2760 includes integrated graphics (Intel GMA 3650), while the Turion X2 RM-75 requires a dedicated GPU.

FeatureAtom Z2760Turion X2 RM-75
Integrated GPU
Yes
IGPU Model
Intel GMA 3650