Atom D525 vs Atom Z2760

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Atom D525 vs Atom Z2760 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Atom D525 vs Atom Z2760: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Atom D525

2010

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌Launch MSRP is still $63 MSRP, while Atom Z2760 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌333.3% higher power demand at 13W vs 3W.

Atom Z2760

2012

Why buy it

✅Draws 3W instead of 13W, a 10W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,697 vs 1,707).

Quick Answers

So, is Atom D525 better than Atom Z2760?

Yes. Atom D525 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 2.4% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 0.6% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Atom D525 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 2.4% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Atom D525 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.6% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Atom D525 is the better buy right now. Atom D525 comes in at an unclear MSRP at $63 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 2.4% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (27.1 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Atom Z2760 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2012 vs 2010). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Atom D525 vs Atom Z2760 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Atom D525

The Atom D525 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 21 June 2010 (15 years ago). It is based on the Pinetrail (2009−2011) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.8 GHz, with boost up to 1.83 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA559. Thermal design power (TDP): 13 Watt. Memory support: DDR2, DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,707 points. Launch price was $63.

Atom Z2760

The Atom Z2760 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 27 September 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Cloverview (2012) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.8 GHz, with boost up to 1.8 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: FC-MB4760. Thermal design power (TDP): 3 Watt. Memory support: DDR2. Passmark benchmark score: 1,697 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Atom D525 and Atom Z2760 share an identical 2-core/4-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 1.83 GHz on the Atom D525 versus 1.8 GHz on the Atom Z2760 — a 1.7% clock advantage for the Atom D525 (base: 1.8 GHz vs 1.8 GHz). The Atom D525 uses the Pinetrail (2009−2011) architecture (45 nm), while the Atom Z2760 uses Cloverview (2012) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Atom D525 scores 1,707 against the Atom Z2760's 1,697 — a 0.6% lead for the Atom D525. Both processors carry 0 kB of L3 cache.

Feature	Atom D525	Atom Z2760
Cores / Threads	2 / 4	2 / 4
Boost Clock	1.83 GHz+2%	1.8 GHz
Base Clock	1.8 GHz	1.8 GHz
L3 Cache	0 kB	0 kB
L2 Cache	512K (per core)	512K (per core)
Process	45 nm	32 nm-29%
Architecture	Pinetrail (2009−2011)	Cloverview (2012)
PassMark	1,707	1,697

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Atom D525 uses the FCBGA559 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Atom Z2760 uses FC-MB4760 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR3-800 memory speed. The Atom D525 supports up to 4 GB of RAM compared to 2 GB — 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 1 (Atom D525) vs 2 (Atom Z2760). Both provide 0 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: Intel NM10 (Atom D525) and Intel BGA1264 (Atom Z2760).

Feature	Atom D525	Atom Z2760
Socket	FCBGA559	FC-MB4760
PCIe Generation	PCIe 2.0	PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR3-800	LPDDR2-800
Max RAM Capacity	4 GB+100%	2 GB
RAM Channels	1	2+100%
ECC Support	No	No
PCIe Lanes	0	0

🔧

Advanced Features

Both include integrated graphics — Intel GMA 3150 (Atom D525) and Intel GMA 3650 (Atom Z2760) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU.