PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Atom D525 vs Celeron 4305UE FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Atom D525 vs Celeron 4305UE: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Atom D525

2010

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +3.4% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Costs $44 less on MSRP ($63 MSRP vs $107 MSRP).
✅Delivers 70.6% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 27.1 vs 15.9 PassMark/$ ($63 MSRP vs $107 MSRP).
✅Draws 13W instead of 15W, a 2W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.

Celeron 4305UE

2018

Why buy it

✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Atom D525 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (1,699 vs 1,707).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 15.9 vs 27.1 PassMark/$ ($107 MSRP vs $63 MSRP).
❌15.4% higher power demand at 15W vs 13W.

Quick Answers

So, is Atom D525 better than Celeron 4305UE?

Yes. Atom D525 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 3.4% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 0.5% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Atom D525 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 3.4% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Atom D525 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.5% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Atom D525 is the better buy right now. Atom D525 comes in $44 cheaper on MSRP at $63 MSRP versus $107 MSRP, and it still gives you a 3.4% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 70.6% better value on MSRP (27.1 vs 15.9 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Celeron 4305UE makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2018 vs 2010). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Atom D525 vs Celeron 4305UE Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Atom D525

The Atom D525 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 21 June 2010 (15 years ago). It is based on the Pinetrail (2009−2011) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.8 GHz, with boost up to 1.83 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA559. Thermal design power (TDP): 13 Watt. Memory support: DDR2, DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,707 points. Launch price was $63.

Celeron 4305UE

The Celeron 4305UE is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 October 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Whiskey Lake-U (2018−2019) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 2 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1528. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 1,699 points. Launch price was $107.

⚡

Processing Power

The Atom D525 packs 2 cores / 4 threads, matching the Celeron 4305UE's 2 cores. Boost clocks reach 1.83 GHz on the Atom D525 versus 2 GHz on the Celeron 4305UE — a 8.9% clock advantage for the Celeron 4305UE. The Atom D525 uses the Pinetrail (2009−2011) architecture (45 nm), while the Celeron 4305UE uses Whiskey Lake-U (2018−2019) (10 nm). In PassMark, the Atom D525 scores 1,707 against the Celeron 4305UE's 1,699 — a 0.5% lead for the Atom D525. L3 cache: 0 kB on the Atom D525 vs 2 MB (total) on the Celeron 4305UE.

Feature	Atom D525	Celeron 4305UE
Cores / Threads	2 / 4	2 / 2
Boost Clock	1.83 GHz	2 GHz+9%
Base Clock	1.8 GHz	—
L3 Cache	0 kB	2 MB (total)
L2 Cache	512K (per core)+100%	256 kB (per core)
Process	45 nm	10 nm-78%
Architecture	Pinetrail (2009−2011)	Whiskey Lake-U (2018−2019)
PassMark	1,707	1,699
Geekbench 6 Single	—	670
Geekbench 6 Multi	—	1,065

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Atom D525 uses the FCBGA559 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Celeron 4305UE uses FCBGA1528 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-800 on the Atom D525 versus DDR4-2133 on the Celeron 4305UE — the Celeron 4305UE supports 166.6% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Celeron 4305UE supports up to 64 GB of RAM compared to 4 GB — 1500% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 1 (Atom D525) vs 2 (Celeron 4305UE). PCIe lanes: 0 (Atom D525) vs 16 (Celeron 4305UE) — the Celeron 4305UE offers 16 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: Intel NM10 (Atom D525) and Whiskey Lake (Celeron 4305UE).

Feature	Atom D525	Celeron 4305UE
Socket	FCBGA559	FCBGA1528
PCIe Generation	PCIe 2.0	PCIe 3.0+50%
Max RAM Speed	DDR3-800	DDR4-2133+167%
Max RAM Capacity	4 GB	64 GB+1500%
RAM Channels	1	2+100%
ECC Support	No	No
PCIe Lanes	0	16

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Atom D525) / VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Celeron 4305UE). Both include integrated graphics — Intel GMA 3150 (Atom D525) and UHD Graphics 610 (Celeron 4305UE) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron 4305UE targets Budget. Direct competitor: Celeron 4305UE rivals Athlon Silver 3050GE.

Feature	Atom D525	Celeron 4305UE
Integrated GPU	Yes	Yes
IGPU Model	Intel GMA 3150	UHD Graphics 610
Unlocked	—	No
AVX-512	—	No
Virtualization	—	VT-x, VT-d, EPT
Target Use	—	Budget

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Atom D525 was priced at $63, while the Celeron 4305UE came in at $107. On launch pricing ($63 vs $107), Atom D525 was $44 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Atom D525 delivers 27.1 pts/$ vs 15.9 pts/$ for the Celeron 4305UE — making the Atom D525 the 52.2% better value option.

Feature	Atom D525	Celeron 4305UE
MSRP	$63-41%	$107
Performance per Dollar	27.1+70%	15.9
Release Date	2010	2018

Search Atom D525 on Amazon

Search Celeron 4305UE on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.