Athlon II M300 vs Atom Z2760

Athlon II M300 vs Atom Z2760 Performance Spectrum

Athlon II M300

2 / 2

1,700

+0.2%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5945WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Atom Z2760

2 / 4

1,697

0.0%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Athlon II M300 vs Atom Z2760 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Athlon II M300 vs Atom Z2760: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Athlon II M300

2009

Why buy it

✅Draws 1W instead of 3W, a 2W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Launch MSRP is still $100 MSRP, while Atom Z2760 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌No integrated graphics, while Atom Z2760 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Atom Z2760

2012

Why buy it

✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel GMA 3650, while Athlon II M300 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,697 vs 1,700).
❌200% higher power demand at 3W vs 1W.

Quick Answers

So, is Athlon II M300 better than Atom Z2760?

Yes. Athlon II M300 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 1.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 0.2% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Athlon II M300 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 1.1% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Athlon II M300 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.2% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Athlon II M300 is the better buy right now. Athlon II M300 comes in at an unclear MSRP at $100 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 1.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (17.0 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Atom Z2760 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2012 vs 2009). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Athlon II M300 vs Atom Z2760 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Athlon II M300

The Athlon II M300 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Caspian (2009) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 2 GHz. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: S1g3. Thermal design power (TDP): 1 MB. Memory support: DDR2. Passmark benchmark score: 1,700 points. Launch price was $149.

Atom Z2760

The Atom Z2760 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 27 September 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Cloverview (2012) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.8 GHz, with boost up to 1.8 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: FC-MB4760. Thermal design power (TDP): 3 Watt. Memory support: DDR2. Passmark benchmark score: 1,697 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

The Athlon II M300 packs 2 cores / 2 threads, matching the Atom Z2760's 2 cores. Boost clocks reach 2 GHz on the Athlon II M300 versus 1.8 GHz on the Atom Z2760 — a 10.5% clock advantage for the Athlon II M300. The Athlon II M300 uses the Caspian (2009) architecture (45 nm), while the Atom Z2760 uses Cloverview (2012) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Athlon II M300 scores 1,700 against the Atom Z2760's 1,697 — a 0.2% lead for the Athlon II M300.

Feature	Athlon II M300	Atom Z2760
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	2 / 4
Boost Clock	2 GHz+11%	1.8 GHz
Base Clock	—	1.8 GHz
L3 Cache	—	0 kB
L2 Cache	1 MB	512K (per core)+51100%
Process	45 nm	32 nm-29%
Architecture	Caspian (2009)	Cloverview (2012)
PassMark	1,700	1,697

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Athlon II M300 uses the S1g3 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Atom Z2760 uses FC-MB4760 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to 800 memory speed. The Athlon II M300 supports up to 8 GB of RAM compared to 2 GB — 300% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 0 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: S1g3 (Athlon II M300) and Intel BGA1264 (Atom Z2760).

Feature	Athlon II M300	Atom Z2760
Socket	S1g3	FC-MB4760
PCIe Generation	PCIe 2.0	PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed	800	LPDDR2-800
Max RAM Capacity	8 GB+300%	2 GB
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	No	No
PCIe Lanes	0	0

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: true (Athlon II M300) / not specified (Atom Z2760). The Atom Z2760 includes integrated graphics (Intel GMA 3650), while the Athlon II M300 requires a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: Athlon II M300 rivals Core 2 Duo T6400.