Athlon II M300 vs Core 2 Duo T7200
Athlon II M300
Core 2 Duo T7200
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Athlon II M300 is positioned at rank 940 and the Core 2 Duo T7200 is on rank 29, so the Core 2 Duo T7200 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Athlon II M300
Performance Per Dollar Core 2 Duo T7200
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Athlon II M300 | Core 2 Duo T7200 |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | Balanced gaming performance | Balanced gaming performance |
| Workstation | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks | ✅ Better multi-core power |
| Price | ⚠️ Higher cost ($10) | ✅ More affordable ($6) |
| Longevity | 🛑 Legacy (Caspian (2009) / 45 nm) | 🛑 Legacy (Merom (2006−2008) / 65 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Athlon II M300 | Core 2 Duo T7200 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+68%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️ Higher cost ($10) | ✅ More affordable ($6) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Athlon II M300 and Core 2 Duo T7200
Athlon II M300
The Athlon II M300 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Caspian (2009) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 2 GHz. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: S1g3. Thermal design power (TDP): 1 MB. Memory support: DDR2. Passmark benchmark score: 1,700 points. Launch price was $149.
Core 2 Duo T7200
The Core 2 Duo T7200 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 28 July 2006 (19 years ago). It is based on the Merom (2006−2008) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 2 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 4 MB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 34 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 1,717 points. Launch price was $286.
Processing Power
Both the Athlon II M300 and Core 2 Duo T7200 share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2 GHz on the Athlon II M300 versus 2 GHz on the Core 2 Duo T7200 — identical boost frequencies. The Athlon II M300 uses the Caspian (2009) architecture (45 nm), while the Core 2 Duo T7200 uses Merom (2006−2008) (65 nm). In PassMark, the Athlon II M300 scores 1,700 against the Core 2 Duo T7200's 1,717 — a 1% lead for the Core 2 Duo T7200.
| Feature | Athlon II M300 | Core 2 Duo T7200 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 2 / 2 | 2 / 2 |
| Boost Clock | 2 GHz | 2 GHz |
| Base Clock | — | 2 GHz |
| L3 Cache | — | 0 kB |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 4 MB+300% |
| Process | 45 nm-31% | 65 nm |
| Architecture | Caspian (2009) | Merom (2006−2008) |
| PassMark | 1,700 | 1,717+1% |
Memory & Platform
The Athlon II M300 uses the S1g3 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Core 2 Duo T7200 uses PGA478 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 800 on the Athlon II M300 versus DDR2-667 on the Core 2 Duo T7200 — the Athlon II M300 supports 199% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Chipset compatibility: S1g3 (Athlon II M300) and GM965,PM965 (Core 2 Duo T7200).
| Feature | Athlon II M300 | Core 2 Duo T7200 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | S1g3 | PGA478 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 2.0+82% | PCIe 1.1 |
| Max RAM Speed | 800+39900% | DDR2-667 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 8 | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | ❌ | ❌ |
| PCIe Lanes | 0 | — |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: true (Athlon II M300) vs VT-x (Core 2 Duo T7200). Primary use case: Core 2 Duo T7200 targets Budget. Direct competitor: Athlon II M300 rivals Core 2 Duo T6400; Core 2 Duo T7200 rivals Athlon 64 X2 TK-42.
| Feature | Athlon II M300 | Core 2 Duo T7200 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| IGPU Model | None | — |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | true | VT-x |
| Target Use | — | Budget |
Value Analysis
The Athlon II M300 launched at $100 MSRP, while the Core 2 Duo T7200 debuted at $286. At current prices ($10 vs $6), the Core 2 Duo T7200 is $4 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Athlon II M300 delivers 170.0 pts/$ vs 286.2 pts/$ for the Core 2 Duo T7200 — making the Core 2 Duo T7200 the 50.9% better value option.
| Feature | Athlon II M300 | Core 2 Duo T7200 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $100-65% | $286 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $10 | $6-40% |
| Performance per Dollar | 170.0 | 286.2+68% |
| Release Date | 2009 | 2006 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Athlon II M300 and Core 2 Duo T7200
