Athlon II M300 vs Celeron 4305UE

Athlon II M300 vs Celeron 4305UE Performance Spectrum

Athlon II M300

2 / 2

1,700

+0.1%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5945WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Celeron 4305UE

2 / 2

1,699

0.0%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Athlon II M300 vs Celeron 4305UE FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Athlon II M300 vs Celeron 4305UE: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Athlon II M300

2009

Why buy it

✅+0.1% higher PassMark.
✅Costs $7 less on MSRP ($100 MSRP vs $107 MSRP).
✅Draws 1W instead of 15W, a 14W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌No integrated graphics, while Celeron 4305UE can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Celeron 4305UE

2018

Why buy it

✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with UHD Graphics 610, while Athlon II M300 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,699 vs 1,700).
❌
7% HIGHER MSRP
$107 MSRPvs$100 MSRP
❌1400% higher power demand at 15W vs 1W.

Quick Answers

So, is Athlon II M300 better than Celeron 4305UE?

Yes. Athlon II M300 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 2.1% average FPS lead across 49 shared CPU game tests in our data and 0.1% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

For gaming, this matchup is basically a tie in the data we have.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Athlon II M300 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.1% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Athlon II M300 is the better buy right now. Athlon II M300 comes in $7 cheaper on MSRP at $100 MSRP versus $107 MSRP, and it still gives you a 2.1% average FPS lead across 49 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 7.1% better value on MSRP (17.0 vs 15.9 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Celeron 4305UE makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2018 vs 2009). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Athlon II M300 vs Celeron 4305UE Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Athlon II M300

The Athlon II M300 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Caspian (2009) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 2 GHz. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: S1g3. Thermal design power (TDP): 1 MB. Memory support: DDR2. Passmark benchmark score: 1,700 points. Launch price was $149.

Celeron 4305UE

The Celeron 4305UE is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 October 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Whiskey Lake-U (2018−2019) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 2 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1528. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 1,699 points. Launch price was $107.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Athlon II M300 and Celeron 4305UE share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2 GHz on the Athlon II M300 versus 2 GHz on the Celeron 4305UE — identical boost frequencies. The Athlon II M300 uses the Caspian (2009) architecture (45 nm), while the Celeron 4305UE uses Whiskey Lake-U (2018−2019) (10 nm). In PassMark, the Athlon II M300 scores 1,700 against the Celeron 4305UE's 1,699 — a 0.1% lead for the Athlon II M300.

Feature	Athlon II M300	Celeron 4305UE
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	2 / 2
Boost Clock	2 GHz	2 GHz
L3 Cache	—	2 MB (total)
L2 Cache	1 MB+300%	256 kB (per core)
Process	45 nm	10 nm-78%
Architecture	Caspian (2009)	Whiskey Lake-U (2018−2019)
PassMark	1,700	1,699
Geekbench 6 Single	—	670
Geekbench 6 Multi	—	1,065

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Athlon II M300 uses the S1g3 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Celeron 4305UE uses FCBGA1528 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 800 on the Athlon II M300 versus DDR4-2133 on the Celeron 4305UE — the Celeron 4305UE supports 166.6% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Celeron 4305UE supports up to 64 GB of RAM compared to 8 GB — 700% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 0 (Athlon II M300) vs 16 (Celeron 4305UE) — the Celeron 4305UE offers 16 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: S1g3 (Athlon II M300) and Whiskey Lake (Celeron 4305UE).

Feature	Athlon II M300	Celeron 4305UE
Socket	S1g3	FCBGA1528
PCIe Generation	PCIe 2.0	PCIe 3.0+50%
Max RAM Speed	800	DDR4-2133+167%
Max RAM Capacity	8 GB	64 GB+700%
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	No	No
PCIe Lanes	0	16

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: true (Athlon II M300) vs VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Celeron 4305UE). The Celeron 4305UE includes integrated graphics (UHD Graphics 610), while the Athlon II M300 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron 4305UE targets Budget. Direct competitor: Athlon II M300 rivals Core 2 Duo T6400; Celeron 4305UE rivals Athlon Silver 3050GE.

Feature	Athlon II M300	Celeron 4305UE
Integrated GPU	No	Yes
IGPU Model	None	UHD Graphics 610
Unlocked	No	No
AVX-512	No	No
Virtualization	true	VT-x, VT-d, EPT
Target Use	—	Budget

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Athlon II M300 was priced at $100, while the Celeron 4305UE came in at $107. On launch pricing ($100 vs $107), Athlon II M300 was $7 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Athlon II M300 delivers 17.0 pts/$ vs 15.9 pts/$ for the Celeron 4305UE — making the Athlon II M300 the 6.8% better value option.

Feature	Athlon II M300	Celeron 4305UE
MSRP	$100-7%	$107
Performance per Dollar	17.0+7%	15.9
Release Date	2009	2018

Search Athlon II M300 on Amazon

Search Celeron 4305UE on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.