Athlon II M300 vs Celeron 4305UE
Athlon II M300
Celeron 4305UE
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Athlon II M300 is positioned at rank 940 and the Celeron 4305UE is on rank 960, so the Athlon II M300 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Athlon II M300
Performance Per Dollar Celeron 4305UE
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Athlon II M300 | Celeron 4305UE |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | Balanced gaming performance | Balanced gaming performance |
| Workstation | ✅ Better multi-core power | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks |
| Price | ✅ More affordable ($10) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($107) |
| Longevity | 🛑 Legacy (Caspian (2009) / 45 nm) | ✨ Modern (Whiskey Lake-U (2018−2019) / 10 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Athlon II M300 | Celeron 4305UE |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+971%) | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅ More affordable ($10) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($107) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Athlon II M300 and Celeron 4305UE
Athlon II M300
The Athlon II M300 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Caspian (2009) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 2 GHz. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: S1g3. Thermal design power (TDP): 1 MB. Memory support: DDR2. Passmark benchmark score: 1,700 points. Launch price was $149.
Celeron 4305UE
The Celeron 4305UE is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 October 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Whiskey Lake-U (2018−2019) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 2 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1528. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 1,699 points. Launch price was $107.
Processing Power
Both the Athlon II M300 and Celeron 4305UE share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2 GHz on the Athlon II M300 versus 2 GHz on the Celeron 4305UE — identical boost frequencies. The Athlon II M300 uses the Caspian (2009) architecture (45 nm), while the Celeron 4305UE uses Whiskey Lake-U (2018−2019) (10 nm). In PassMark, the Athlon II M300 scores 1,700 against the Celeron 4305UE's 1,699 — a 0.1% lead for the Athlon II M300.
| Feature | Athlon II M300 | Celeron 4305UE |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 2 / 2 | 2 / 2 |
| Boost Clock | 2 GHz | 2 GHz |
| L3 Cache | — | 2 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB+300% | 256 kB (per core) |
| Process | 45 nm | 10 nm-78% |
| Architecture | Caspian (2009) | Whiskey Lake-U (2018−2019) |
| PassMark | 1,700 | 1,699 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 670 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 1,065 |
Memory & Platform
The Athlon II M300 uses the S1g3 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Celeron 4305UE uses FCBGA1528 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 800 on the Athlon II M300 versus DDR4-2133 on the Celeron 4305UE — the Athlon II M300 supports 198% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Celeron 4305UE supports up to 64 GB of RAM compared to 8 — 155.6% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 0 (Athlon II M300) vs 16 (Celeron 4305UE) — the Celeron 4305UE offers 16 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: S1g3 (Athlon II M300) and Whiskey Lake (Celeron 4305UE).
| Feature | Athlon II M300 | Celeron 4305UE |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | S1g3 | FCBGA1528 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 2.0 | PCIe 3.0+50% |
| Max RAM Speed | 800+19900% | DDR4-2133 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 8 | 64 GB+838860700% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | ❌ | ❌ |
| PCIe Lanes | 0 | 16 |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: true (Athlon II M300) vs VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Celeron 4305UE). The Celeron 4305UE includes integrated graphics (UHD Graphics 610), while the Athlon II M300 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron 4305UE targets Budget. Direct competitor: Athlon II M300 rivals Core 2 Duo T6400; Celeron 4305UE rivals Athlon Silver 3050GE.
| Feature | Athlon II M300 | Celeron 4305UE |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | Yes |
| IGPU Model | None | UHD Graphics 610 |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | true | VT-x, VT-d, EPT |
| Target Use | — | Budget |
Value Analysis
The Athlon II M300 launched at $100 MSRP, while the Celeron 4305UE debuted at $107. At current prices ($10 vs $107), the Athlon II M300 is $97 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Athlon II M300 delivers 170.0 pts/$ vs 15.9 pts/$ for the Celeron 4305UE — making the Athlon II M300 the 165.8% better value option.
| Feature | Athlon II M300 | Celeron 4305UE |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $100-7% | $107 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $10-91% | $107 |
| Performance per Dollar | 170.0+969% | 15.9 |
| Release Date | 2009 | 2018 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Athlon II M300 and Celeron 4305UE
