Atom Z2760 vs Celeron G1820

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Atom Z2760 vs Celeron G1820 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Atom Z2760 vs Celeron G1820: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Atom Z2760

2012

Why buy it

✅+0.1% higher PassMark.
✅Draws 3W instead of 54W, a 51W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.

Celeron G1820

2013

Why buy it

✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,696 vs 1,697).
❌Launch MSRP is still $110 MSRP, while Atom Z2760 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌1700% higher power demand at 54W vs 3W.

Quick Answers

So, is Celeron G1820 better than Atom Z2760?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Celeron G1820 is ahead with a 0.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Atom Z2760 pulls ahead with 0.1% better PassMark.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Atom Z2760 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.1% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Celeron G1820 is the better buy right now. Celeron G1820 comes in at an unclear MSRP at $110 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 0.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. The compromise is that Atom Z2760 is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 0.1% better PassMark. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (15.4 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Celeron G1820 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2013 vs 2012). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Atom Z2760 vs Celeron G1820 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Atom Z2760

The Atom Z2760 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 27 September 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Cloverview (2012) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.8 GHz, with boost up to 1.8 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: FC-MB4760. Thermal design power (TDP): 3 Watt. Memory support: DDR2. Passmark benchmark score: 1,697 points. Launch price was $69.

Celeron G1820

The Celeron G1820 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 December 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.7 GHz, with boost up to 2.7 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB. L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1150. Thermal design power (TDP): 53 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,696 points. Launch price was $110.

⚡

Processing Power

The Atom Z2760 packs 2 cores / 4 threads, matching the Celeron G1820's 2 cores. Boost clocks reach 1.8 GHz on the Atom Z2760 versus 2.7 GHz on the Celeron G1820 — a 40% clock advantage for the Celeron G1820 (base: 1.8 GHz vs 2.7 GHz). The Atom Z2760 uses the Cloverview (2012) architecture (32 nm), while the Celeron G1820 uses Haswell (2013−2015) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Atom Z2760 scores 1,697 against the Celeron G1820's 1,696 — a 0.1% lead for the Atom Z2760. L3 cache: 0 kB on the Atom Z2760 vs 2 MB on the Celeron G1820.

Feature	Atom Z2760	Celeron G1820
Cores / Threads	2 / 4	2 / 2
Boost Clock	1.8 GHz	2.7 GHz+50%
Base Clock	1.8 GHz	2.7 GHz+50%
L3 Cache	0 kB	2 MB
L2 Cache	512K (per core)+100%	256 kB (per core)
Process	32 nm	22 nm-31%
Architecture	Cloverview (2012)	Haswell (2013−2015)
PassMark	1,697	1,696
Geekbench 6 Single	—	496
Geekbench 6 Multi	—	910

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Atom Z2760 uses the FC-MB4760 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Celeron G1820 uses LGA1150 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches LPDDR2-800 on the Atom Z2760 versus DDR3-1333 on the Celeron G1820 — the Celeron G1820 supports 66.6% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Celeron G1820 supports up to 32 GB of RAM compared to 2 GB — 1500% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 0 (Atom Z2760) vs 16 (Celeron G1820) — the Celeron G1820 offers 16 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: Intel BGA1264 (Atom Z2760) and H81,B85,H87,Z87,H97,Z97 (Celeron G1820).

Feature	Atom Z2760	Celeron G1820
Socket	FC-MB4760	LGA1150
PCIe Generation	PCIe 2.0	PCIe 3.0+50%
Max RAM Speed	LPDDR2-800	DDR3-1333+67%
Max RAM Capacity	2 GB	32 GB+1500%
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	No	Yes
PCIe Lanes	0	16

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Atom Z2760) / VT-x (Celeron G1820). Both include integrated graphics — Intel GMA 3650 (Atom Z2760) and HD Graphics (Haswell) (Celeron G1820) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron G1820 targets Budget. Direct competitor: Celeron G1820 rivals Pentium G3220.