Atom Z2760
VS
A6-4455M

Atom Z2760 vs A6-4455M

Intel

Atom Z2760

2 Cores4 Thrd3 WWMax: 1.8 GHz2012
VS
AMD

A6-4455M

2 Cores2 Thrd17 WWMax: 2.6 GHz2012

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Atom Z2760 is positioned at rank 529 and the A6-4455M is on rank 731, so the Atom Z2760 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Atom Z2760

#167
Core Ultra 7 258V
MSRP: $450|Avg: $400
99%
#169
Core i7-1280P
MSRP: $482|Avg: $482
98%
#517
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
691%
#518
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
681%
#519
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
626%
#520
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
623%
#521
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
617%
#523
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
596%
#524
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
571%
#525
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
570%
#526
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
555%
#529
Atom Z2760
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar A6-4455M

#719
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
1042%
#720
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
1027%
#721
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
943%
#722
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
939%
#723
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
930%
#725
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
898%
#726
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
861%
#727
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
860%
#728
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
837%
#731
A6-4455M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#744
Pentium 6805
MSRP: $161|Avg: $161
98%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Trade-off: The A6-4455M leads in gaming performance. However, the Atom Z2760 is the stronger candidate for professional workloads, offering 0.5% greater multi-core processing power.
InsightAtom Z2760A6-4455M
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Better multi-core power
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Cloverview (2012) / 32 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Trinity (2012−2013) / 32 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

InsightAtom Z2760A6-4455M
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Atom Z2760 and A6-4455M

Intel

Atom Z2760

The Atom Z2760 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 27 September 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Cloverview (2012) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.8 GHz, with boost up to 1.8 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: FC-MB4760. Thermal design power (TDP): 3 Watt. Memory support: DDR2. Passmark benchmark score: 1,697 points. Launch price was $69.

AMD

A6-4455M

The A6-4455M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Trinity (2012−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 2.6 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 2 MB (total). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: FP2. Thermal design power (TDP): 17 Watt. Memory support: unknown Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 1,689 points. Launch price was $70.

Processing Power

The Atom Z2760 packs 2 cores / 4 threads, matching the A6-4455M's 2 cores. Boost clocks reach 1.8 GHz on the Atom Z2760 versus 2.6 GHz on the A6-4455M — a 36.4% clock advantage for the A6-4455M (base: 1.8 GHz vs 2.1 GHz). The Atom Z2760 uses the Cloverview (2012) architecture (32 nm), while the A6-4455M uses Trinity (2012−2013) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Atom Z2760 scores 1,697 against the A6-4455M's 1,689 — a 0.5% lead for the Atom Z2760. Both processors carry 0 kB of L3 cache.

FeatureAtom Z2760A6-4455M
Cores / Threads
2 / 4
2 / 2
Boost Clock
1.8 GHz
2.6 GHz+44%
Base Clock
1.8 GHz
2.1 GHz+17%
L3 Cache
0 kB
0 kB
L2 Cache
512K (per core)
2 MB (total)+300%
Process
32 nm
32 nm
Architecture
Cloverview (2012)
Trinity (2012−2013)
PassMark
1,697
1,689
Geekbench 6 Single
253
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Atom Z2760 uses the FC-MB4760 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the A6-4455M uses FP2 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches LPDDR2-800 on the Atom Z2760 versus DDR3-1333 on the A6-4455M — the A6-4455M supports 40% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The A6-4455M supports up to 8 GB of RAM compared to 2 GB 120% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 0 (Atom Z2760) vs 16 (A6-4455M) — the A6-4455M offers 16 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives.

FeatureAtom Z2760A6-4455M
Socket
FC-MB4760
FP2
PCIe Generation
PCIe 2.0
PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed
LPDDR2-800
DDR3-1333+50%
Max RAM Capacity
2 GB
8 GB+300%
RAM Channels
2
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
0
16
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Atom Z2760) / AMD-V (A6-4455M). Both include integrated graphics Intel GMA 3650 (Atom Z2760) and Radeon HD 7500G (A6-4455M) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: A6-4455M targets Thin and Light Laptop. Direct competitor: A6-4455M rivals Pentium 987.

FeatureAtom Z2760A6-4455M
Integrated GPU
Yes
Yes
IGPU Model
Intel GMA 3650
Radeon HD 7500G
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
AMD-V
Target Use
Thin and Light Laptop