Atom Z540
VS
Celeron 220

Atom Z540 vs Celeron 220

Intel

Atom Z540

1 Cores2 Thrd2.4 WWMax: 0.07 GHz2008
VS
Intel

Celeron 220

1 Cores1 Thrd512 WWMax: 1.2 GHz2007

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Atom Z540 is positioned at rank 334 and the Celeron 220 is on rank 1143, so the Atom Z540 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Atom Z540

#322
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
481%
#323
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
474%
#324
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
435%
#325
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
433%
#326
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
429%
#328
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
414%
#329
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
397%
#330
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
397%
#331
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
386%
#334
Atom Z540
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#336
Xeon E3-1505M v5
MSRP: $115|Avg: $115
100%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Celeron 220

#1131
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
3850%
#1132
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
3794%
#1133
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
3483%
#1134
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
3467%
#1135
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
3435%
#1137
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
3318%
#1138
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
3181%
#1139
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
3176%
#1140
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
3091%
#1143
Celeron 220
MSRP: $42|Avg: $42
100%
#1144
Pentium B960
MSRP: $134|Avg: $15
100%
#1146
Pentium 957
MSRP: $134|Avg: $10
99%
#1147
Core 2 Duo SL9400
MSRP: $284|Avg: N/A
99%
#1149
Pentium N3540
MSRP: $161|Avg: $161
98%
#1150
Core i7-3555LE
MSRP: $300|Avg: $280
98%
#1151
Core i3-2377M
MSRP: $250|Avg: N/A
97%
#1152
Core 2 Duo E8435
MSRP: $150|Avg: $74
97%
#1153
Celeron M 723
MSRP: $161|Avg: $161
96%
#1154
Core M-5Y51
MSRP: $281|Avg: $281
95%
#1155
Core i7-3517UE
MSRP: $330|Avg: $35
95%
#1156
Pentium N3530
MSRP: $161|Avg: $20
94%
#1158
Core i3-330E
MSRP: $177|Avg: $89
93%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Leadership: The Celeron 220 delivers superior performance across the board. It outperforms the Atom Z540 in both compute-intensive tasks (4.8% faster) and gaming workloads.
InsightAtom Z540Celeron 220
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($42)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Silverthorne (2008−2010) / 45 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Conroe (2006−2007) / 65 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

InsightAtom Z540Celeron 220
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($42)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Atom Z540 and Celeron 220

Intel

Atom Z540

The Atom Z540 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2 April 2008 (17 years ago). It is based on the Silverthorne (2008−2010) architecture. It features 1 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.86 GHz, with boost up to 0.07 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: PBGA441. Thermal design power (TDP): 2.4 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 305 points. Launch price was $160.

Intel

Celeron 220

The Celeron 220 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Conroe (2006−2007) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Base frequency is 1.2 GHz, with boost up to 1.2 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: BGA479. Thermal design power (TDP): 19 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 320 points. Launch price was $69.

Processing Power

The Atom Z540 packs 1 cores / 2 threads, matching the Celeron 220's 1 cores. Boost clocks reach 0.07 GHz on the Atom Z540 versus 1.2 GHz on the Celeron 220 — a 178% clock advantage for the Celeron 220 (base: 1.86 GHz vs 1.2 GHz). The Atom Z540 uses the Silverthorne (2008−2010) architecture (45 nm), while the Celeron 220 uses Conroe (2006−2007) (65 nm). In PassMark, the Atom Z540 scores 305 against the Celeron 220's 320 — a 4.8% lead for the Celeron 220. Both processors carry 0 kB of L3 cache.

FeatureAtom Z540Celeron 220
Cores / Threads
1 / 2
1 / 1
Boost Clock
0.07 GHz
1.2 GHz+1614%
Base Clock
1.86 GHz+55%
1.2 GHz
L3 Cache
0 kB
0 kB
L2 Cache
512 kB
512 kB
Process
45 nm-31%
65 nm
Architecture
Silverthorne (2008−2010)
Conroe (2006−2007)
PassMark
305
320+5%
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Atom Z540 uses the PBGA441 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Celeron 220 uses BGA479 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR2-533 memory speed. The Celeron 220 supports up to 4 GB of RAM compared to 2 GB 66.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 1-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 0 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: Intel US15W (Atom Z540) and 945G,G31,G41 (Celeron 220).

FeatureAtom Z540Celeron 220
Socket
PBGA441
BGA479
PCIe Generation
PCIe 2.0+82%
PCIe 1.1
Max RAM Speed
DDR2-533
DDR2-667
Max RAM Capacity
2 GB
4 GB+100%
RAM Channels
1
1
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
0
0
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Atom Z540) / No (Celeron 220). Primary use case: Celeron 220 targets Budget. Direct competitor: Celeron 220 rivals Athlon 64 3100+.

FeatureAtom Z540Celeron 220
Integrated GPU
No
No
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
No
Target Use
Budget